Great Irish Dominicans Thomas Burke op

Great Irish Dominicans Thomas Burke op

Morocco, an Ancient Roman Basilica and Book Smuggling – these three very disparate topics are linked by the life of one extraordinary Irish Dominican friar. During the 17th century, the Dominican mission in Ireland was a very fragile thing.

There were some places and times when friars had the freedom to preach the Gospel and celebrate the sacraments, but there was always the risk of suppression and even, as we saw last month in the case of Thaddeus Moriarty OP, violent persecution.

It was impossible during such a time for Dominicans to establish stable centres of study in Ireland, or to obtain the financial support of powerful figures in Irish society, so for both these purposes the friars of Irish Dominicans active at royal courts, and at the papal court, lobbying and fundraising in support of the work of their confrères in Ireland, and none were more resourceful or effective in this task than the Galwayman, John O’Connor, known in religious life as John of St Dominic.

Dogged Determination. He appears in the historical record firstly in Spain, in association with a project to smuggle theological and catechetical books to Ireland, backed by King Philip IV. Based on records that survive, historians believe that many thousands of books were collected in Spain as part of this project and

transported to safe locations in Ireland. Many of these books would have been designed for lay readership, while others were aimed at the ongoing theological formation of the friars them- selves. In these records, throughout the 1640s, the name of John O’Connor appears again and again. He was dogged in his determination to supply the suffering Church in Ireland, and his confrères especially, with good reading material.

In the 1660s, O’Connor turns up in Rome, as the agent of the Irish Dominicans there. One of his projects in this role is the establishment in Madrid of a house of studies for Dominicans in exile – Irish, English, and Scots – under the care of the Irish Provincial. It was to be funded by a large network of aristocratic donors, assembled by O’Connor.

Near the end of that decade another  quite unexpected ject came to fruition: the founding of an Irish Dominican priory in Morocco, which endured from 1668-1681. The Portuguese had a colony there, in the town of Tangier, but with the marriage of Catherine of Braganza to Charles II (a match in which another Irish Dominican, Daniel O’Daly OP, played a significant part), Tangier passed into English possession. Portuguese soldiers moved out, and soldiers of the English Crown, including many Irish Catholics, moved in.

The ever-resourceful John O’Connor, with the help of the King of Spain, managed to con- vince the Pope and the Master of the Dominican Order to transfer the Portuguese Dominican priory there into the care of the Irish Dominicans. The first prior of the Irish community in Tangier was Thomas of St Dominic, well known already for his effective- ness in reconciling English and Scottish Protestants to the Catholic faith, and he continued to

carry out this evangelical work in English Tangier, much to the annoyance of the authorities back in England.

A Twin Blessing

Finally, the jewel in the crown of the administrative achievements of John O’Connor: the founding of an Irish priory in Rome. The earlier Madrid studium never really came to pass, and from 1670-1677 O’Connor laboured for the establishment of a similar house in Rome, to complement the Irish houses of study already estab- lished in Lisbon and Louvain. On 4 August 1677, O’Connor received on behalf of the Irish Dominican Province the twin convents of San Sisto and San Clemente.

These venerable buildings provided refuge in which the formation of gen erations of Irish friars could take place, friars who returned to the challenging Irish mission armed with the best of continental training. One of these houses San Sisto is where O’Connor was buried when he died the following year. The other – San Clemente – is home to a thriving community of Irish friars to this very day.

John O’Connor is not, perhaps, one of the more romantic or heroic figures in the history of the Irish Dominicans. He wasn’t martyred or made a bishop, we don’t know of the sermons he preached or the spiritual counsel he gave. But we do know that he was a practical man, an organiser, and an effective administrator, whose worldly wisdom and holy tenacity was a boon to the Dominican mission in his time.

GREGOR

Sing to the Lord- Holy God We Praise Thy Name!

Ray Hughes

In 1956 the European Broad- end of the broadcast. In the television Union, circles, that was established to develop television in this part of the world, launched a song contest that is now one of the longest-running song competitions in the world. Known as the Eurovision Song Contest, named after the EBUS television service, 52 nations now compete to win the prize.

The competition has changed a lot ove the years, but one thing that has not is the music that is played at the beginning and the called an indent or identifier. Since the broadcast is being picked up by many nations, this little piece of music lets the different television providers know that they have suc- cessfully joined to the Eurovision service. These few bars, which sound so grand, with strings, trum pets and drums, is the opening of a larger piece of music by a French composer called Charpentier. It is the beginning of his Te Deum, an orchestral version of the Church’s

‘official’ prayer of thanks. What ever comes afterwards in the show, at least it begins with an inadvertent moment of prayer! There is a story about the origin of the Te Deum. Saint Augustine was an adult when he was bap- tized. When the ceremony was over, he said in thanksgiving, ‘We praise You, O God.’ St Ambrose, who baptized him, replied, ‘We acknowledge you to be the Lord.’

There began a to and fro of praise between them. What was said was collected and put together as a hymn. That hymn became known by the first two words of the text in Latin, the Te Deum. While a leg- end, over the centuries the Te Deum hymn became part of the Divine Office. It is prayed on Sundays and feast days, and at moments of thanksgiving when the Church wants to give particu- lar thanks to God for something.

Sing Out With Joy

Like most of these great hymns, there are numerous translations. One such, that is most familiar to us begins, “Holy God we praise Thy name.” The tune associated with it was written for a German translation. Some years ago, I hap- pened to be in a cathedral some- where in Switzerland when young men were being ordained. The Mass concluded with this hymn. What struck me about that event was the great gusto by which the congregation sung the hymn. It was real thanksgiving!

The words of the Te Deum are a long litany of praises and petitions. It begins by acknowledging the greatness of God, or in words we know, “all on earth thy scepter own, all in heaven above adore thee.” It then gives thanks and praise for sal- vation given to us by Jesus. Finally, it asks for continued protection, for health, security and prosperity, lead- ing of course to the fulfilment of happiness in Heaven. It is remark- able how much reference to Heaven there is in the hymn, “Hark, the glad celestial hymn, angel choirs above are raising.” Heaven is in fact, the main point of the hymn.

When the Te Deum is sung in its traditional form it is sung by two ‘choirs.’ A small group sings a line, representing the Church on earth. The next line is sung by the full choir and the congregation, representing the choirs of Heaven.

It is not just earth that is praising God, it is the entire universe – visible and invisible! In life it is easy to get caught up with the things of this world.

It is only natural to worry and fret. Sometimes we need to take a step back and acknowledge the many blessings we have. That is why we thank God before we petition. God is always faithful. The final words of the Te Deum remind us of this: “Lo, I put my trust in Thee; Never, Lord, abandon me.”

A the e great Dominican foundations in Ireland, founded by Milo de Bermingham c. 1241. The church was held in high regard, serving as burial places for nobles such as de Bermingham and sever- al bishops of Clonfert and Kilmacduagg. Sadly, among the numbers of Dominicans killed during Cromwell’s conquest of Ireland were six that we know of from Athenry. These were Brothers James O’Moran, Dominic Black and Richard Hovedon and Fathers John O’Quillan, Stephen Pettit and Vincent Gerald Dillon.

The latter came from a noble family and was renowned for being an extremely holy man. He had been at one time Vicar of the Irish Dominican Convent of Lisbon. He returned to Athenry and afterwards moved to London with the Irish who served under the King’s standard. As chaplain to these Irish Royalist forces during the Civil War, it came about that he was present at the battle of Marston Moor which marked a turning point in the War.

This battle was one of the largest ever fought on English soil and took place about five miles west of York near the village of Long Marston. It began at 7 pm and lasted about two hours. Even in that short time the Royalists lost 4000 men killed and had 1500 taken prisoner. It confirmed that a well-equipped and trained army could win the war and established Cromwell’s reputation as a great commander.

After negotiations, the city finally surrendered to the parliamentary army on 16 July 1644. The Royalist garrison marched out and the Parliamentarians marched in, holding a thanksgiving service in the Minster. The Royalists effectively abandoned all control in the north of England.

Abandoned too to his fate was Fr Dillon. He had been moving amid the grime and smoke of the battleground, comforting the dying Royalist soldiers, as well as hearing the last confessions of those Irish who were about to meet their Maker. It was not long before he was captured and thrown into prison. Conditions were dire.

The unfortunate prisoners had to rely largely on chari- ty for basic food such as hard biscuits. They were left in their own waste and almost buried alive in subterraneous cellars where light could barely be seen through a little grate. Fr Dillon eventually succumbed to the terrible hardships of the place and died from starvation. An Irish Dominican martyr a long way from home and the fields of Athenry.

Libraries have long been sanctu- Laries of knowledge and culture.

However they are not only reposito- ries of books but can be architectural marvels that tell stories of the civili- sations that built them. Here are just a few of the most beautiful old libraries, each with its unique charm and significance, that continue to inspire awe and admiration today.

The Vatican Library The Vatican Library (Apostolica Vaticana) in Vatican City, Rome, is one of the most renowned and oldest libraries, housing an immense col- lection of religious, historical, and cultural texts.

Although the Vatican Library was officially founded in 1475 by Pope Sixtus IV, its origins go back much earlier, with collections being assem- bled by various popes as early as the fourth century. The library features a combina- tion of Renaissance and Baroque styles.

Its Sistine Hall, built by Pope Sixtus V in the late sixteenth century, is a masterpiece of Renais- sance architecture, with stunning frescoes, intricate gold decorations, and vaulted ceilings. The hall is one of the most famous parts of the library and a striking example of papal grandeur.

The library houses over 1.1 mil- lion books and 75,000 manuscripts, many of which are rare and ancient. Its collection includes biblical texts, medieval manuscripts, classical works, papal documents, and sig- nificant historical writings from antiquity to the Renaissance. Some of the most famous items include the Codex Vaticanus, one of the oldest known manuscripts of the Bible, and numerous other priceless documents.

The Vatican Library is one of the world’s greatest repositories of reli- gious and cultural history. It contin- ues to be a critical centre for re- search, particularly for scholars of history, theology, and the humani- ties.

The Abbey Library of St Gall The Abbey Library of St Gall in St. Gallen, Switzerland is one of the oldest and most beautiful monastic libraries in the world. It was found- ed in 719 AD as part of the Abbey of Saint Gall, a Benedictine monastery that became a significant centre of learning during the Middle Ages.

The library’s current Baroque building dates back to the mid- eighteenth century (1758-1767). The interior is renowned for its opu- lent Baroque design, featuring stun- ning stucco work, wooden book shelves, intricate carvings, and an elaborate painted ceiling fresco that represents divine wisdom.

The library hall is one of the most beautiful in the world, with a rich, warm atmosphere due to its combi- nation of woodwork, gold accents, and natural light.

The library holds around 170,000 volumes, including a precious col- lection of medieval manuscripts and early printed books. Its collection of early medieval manuscripts is one of the most important in Europe, many of which date back to the eighth century. The library is now a UNESCO World Heritage site; its historical significance and breathtaking beau- ty make it a cultural and architectur- al gem in Europe.

The Bodleian Library

The Bodleian Library in Oxford, England date back to 1320, but it was officially established as the Bodleian Library by Sir Thomas Bodley in 1602. The complex fea- tures a mix of architectural styles,

primarily medieval and neo- Gothic. Its oldest part, the Duke Humfrey’s Library, is a stunning example of medieval architecture, with dark wood paneling, vaulted ceilings, and rows of ancient books. The seventeenth-century “Rad- cliffe Camera”, part of the library, is an iconic building in neo-classical style, with its grand rotunda and large dome.

The Bodleian is one of the largest libraries in the UK, holding over 13 mil- lion printed items. It is a cornerstone of Oxford University, and its stun- ning architecture and vast collection of manu- scripts, maps, and books make it a centre of learning and a symbol of academic tradition.

It is a cornerstone of Oxford University, and its stun- ning architecture and vast collection of manu- scripts, maps, and books make it a centre of learning and a symbol of academic tradition.

The Austrian National Library (Österreichische Nationalbibliothek) is one of the most historically significant libraries in the world.

Originally established in 1368 as the Imperial Library of the Habsburgs, it became the Austrian National Library after the garian Empire in 1920. It is housed in the Hofburg Palace, a historic imperial palace in the centre of Vienna.

The most famous part of the library is the Prunksaal (State Hall), an extraordinary example of Baroque architecture. Built in the eighteenth century under Emperor Charles VI, it features a grandiose

interior with frescoed ceilings, marble statues, and ornate wooden bookshelves. The magnificent library halls are filled with natural light from its central dome.

The library holds over 12 million items, including books, manuscripts, maps, and rare books. It is not just a repository of knowledge but also a stunning cultural monu- ment, reflecting the rich history of the Habsburg monarchy and Austrian intellectual heritage.
The Trinity College Library The Trinity College Library in Dublin, Ireland is one of the most iconic libraries, known for its his- torical significance and stunning architecture.

The library was founded along with Trinity College itself in 1592 by Queen Elizabeth I. The most famous part of the library, the Long Room, was built between 1712 and 1732 and is the main attraction of the library. It is a majestic hall stretching nearly 65 meters in length. It features a barrel-vaulted ceiling, dark wooden bookshelves that line the walls.

The room holds over 200,000 of the library’s oldest books, manuscripts and maps and is a stunning example of classical library archi- tecture, evoking a deep sense of tra- dition, scholarship, and history.
One of its most famous treasures is the Book of Kells, an illuminated manuscript created by Celtic
Long Hall Trinity College, Dublin. monks around 800 AD. This intri- cate and beautifully decorated man- uscript is a masterpiece of medieval art and a cultural icon of Ireland.

The Trinity College Library is not only a working academic library but also a symbol of Irish heritage and a major tourist destination.

These beautiful old libraries are not only architectural marvels but also guardians of human knowledge and history. Each library offers a unique glimpse into the past, pre- serving the stories and wisdom of generations.

Visiting these libraries is like stepping into a world where art, history, and literature converge, providing an unparalleled cultural experience. Whether you are a his- tory enthusiast, or architecture afi- cionado, these libraries are sure to captivate your imagination and inspire your soul.

John

John Willem Gran is hardly a household name. But this Nor- wegian priest lived a life which was, in many ways, like a journey through the most historic mom ents of the twentieth century. He was an eyewitness of both Nazi Germany and Mussolini’s Italy. He was present at the sentencing of Vidkun Quisling, the leader of Norway during the Nazi occupa- tion.

After a period working in the film industry, he decided to become a Trappist monk in Wales, a life from which he was plucked to become bishop of Oslo. Most remarkably, perhaps, he was the only Norwegian participant at the Second Vatican Council (1962- 1965), the ecumenical council which continues to have a massive influence on the life of the Catholic Church today.

This was a surprising journey for a boy who announced to his parents, at the age of fifteen, that he was an atheist, and who perse- vered in this decision until he was twenty-one.

Little or no Religion

Catholicism is very much a minority religion in Norway. The Lutheran Church is the state church, and most Norwegians are (at least nominally) members of it. Only three per cent of the popula- tion is Catholic, and the proportion was much smaller when Gran was growing up in the era between the world wars.

He was born Willem Nicol- aysen Gran in 1920, in Bergen on the west coast of Norway. His family were wealthy and cultured, but not religious. His moth- er would say the Lord’s Prayer with Willem and his brother Jens as she put them to bed, and the family would attend the “chil- dren’s service” in church on Christmas Eve, where they would sing carols. Sometimes Willem would accompany his grand- mother to church on Sunday.

But, aside from this, religion hardly featured in Willem’s upbringing. Once, his father found him reading a book and asked him what it was. When he replied, “the

Bible”, the reaction was embar- verse. His response was: “OK, I’m rassed silence.

So, when the time came for Willem’s confirmation, he decided to follow the lead of a school friend and declare himself an atheist. This created no stir in the Gran house- hold. Both my parents in fact seemed relieved at the news. Possibly they felt it a relief to avoid all the fuss connected with the cus- tomary festivities.”

The Supreme Being

Around this time, Willem’s parents started to drift apart (they subse- quently separated). Willem was sent to live for a year in the town of Lillehammer, where the local pup- pet theatre aroused in him a fasci- nation with theatre and, ultimately, an ambition to become an opera director. This was an impossible career to pursue in Norway, so he went to study in Europe. In Germany and Italy, he experienced the rule of the Nazis and Fascists, to both of which he was totally opposed.

All through his teens, Willem had maintained his atheism, al- though he had also acquired a belief in reincarnation from read- ing Buddhist books. Now in his early twenties, he found himself living in Rome with housemates who had a range of different reli- gious opinions. One of them con- vinced Willem that some Supreme Being had to be behind the uni- willing to admit to the existence of a god. But if so, it is up to Him to come forward. I for my part cannot see that such a recognition makes any difference.”

To Willem’s surprise, God responded to the challenge. One night soon after the discussion, he was having trouble falling asleep, and felt as though “a powerful and independent being touched the depths of my heart”. He realised it was God: “God did not only exist somewhere out there’, He was in my heart… Nothing could ever be the same”.

The Ideal and The Concrete Willem started to attend Sunday Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica, and arranged meetings with a Jesuit priest, Fr. Poppe, to discuss Cath- olicism. His initial objective was to argue the Jesuit out of his beliefs,

Bishop Gran, Bishop of Oslo from 1964 to 1984 but the opposite happened. “Slowly I came to believe the divinity of Christ to be genuine. And with that it was done. I had become a Christian and felt happy and secure.”

A Christian, but not yet a Catholic. The Church as an institu- tion was Willem’s last obstacle. He challenged the Jesuit priest with the darker parts of Catholic history, such as the Inquisition. Fr. Poppe answered patiently and honestly.

“My mentor concealed nothing but succeeded in putting these matters into their historical context. We talked not least about the Church as an ideal, as it must have been intended by God, compared to the concrete thing which, however, in spite of all its shortcomings, had kept faithfully going throughout the centuries and was still doing so.”

All his obstacles removed, Willem was received into the Catholic Church in the Jesuit headquarters in Rome, and then made his confirmation in St. Peter’s Basilica.

Still only twenty-one years of age, a highly eventful life still lay ahead of Willem. He joined the mil- itary to help in the liberation of Rome, became a contemplative monk on the Welsh island of Caldey (where he received the reli- gious name John), was ordained a priest in 1957, and was astonished to be appointed Coadjutor (or assis- tant) Bishop of Oslo in 1963.

He was himself Bishop of Oslo from 1964 to 1984. He participated in the later sessions of the Second Vatican Council, where he was a strong supporter of religious liberty and friendlier relations with other reli- gions. He died in 2008.

Mart ark Foxhunt was a staunch protestant. He attended his local protestant church each Sunday morning, paid his tithes, and lived a quiet life. He was raised a protestant by his father (a protestant minister) and his moth- er in England’s serene country- side. He had a successful career as a theoretical physicist and often lectured in his local univer- sity.

For Mark, everything was about science. He often joked that he could believe in God on a Sunday, because that was his ‘day-off. In his mid-thirties, Mark married a Catholic woman, and they had one son named Alex. Mark and his wife went their separate ways every Sunday. He attended his protestant church, whereas his wife attended her local parish church. Her parish was vibrant, and Mark was envi- ous of its ability to thrive, whilst his own congregation seemed to dwindle each week.

Mark often asked his wife how her parish was so active in the local community and gathered people from the neighbouring regions to attend their Sunday Mass. ‘Oh,’ his wife would sigh, ‘I’ve told you before. We have a great devotion to our Lady in our parish. She’s your Mother. One mention of the Blessed Virgin Mary was enough for Mark to stonewall his wife for the rest of the day. He could not fathom how Catholics would ‘wor- ship’ this woman! Catholics, so he believed, put this creature on such a high pedestal that should be reserved for God alone!

A Visit to The Shrines

So, one day, his wife concocted a plan to spark his devotion to our Lady. She organised a packaged

tour for him to visit the Marian shrines of Fatima in Portugal, Lourdes in France, and Knock in Ireland. This, she prayed, would open his heart to the beauty of the Mother of God.

At first, as his wife expected, Mark was resolutely opposed. Never would he take time off his work or abandon his Sunday church commitments just for the sake of something that he regard- ed as superstitious! Plus, he said to his wife, Alex was already two years of age and was not yet speaking; he babbled but had trouble with words. His father’s absence might further hinder his progress.

His wife dismissed these reasons off-hand, knowing that Mark was just looking for excuses. And so, she continued to pester him with the idea of travel- ling. As the weeks went by, Mark’s workload became heavier and heavier, and he grew stressed. ‘I need a break,’ he thought to himself. The idea of his wife’s packaged holiday became more and more appealing: ‘I could visit the beautiful Pyrenees in France and drink their wine! I’ve never been to Portugal, and Fatima would be the perfect excuse. And Knock, well, it’s the rugged west of Ireland, I suppose?’

His wife was delighted that Mark had finally accepted her invitation and believed in her heart that this would be the great

moment of conversion for her stubborn husband. Mark packed his bags and met his travelling companions at the airport, but things went from bad to worse very quickly. The priest-chaplain distributed Scriptural quotes to each pilgrim for their personal meditation; Mark’s was from the Gospel of Matthew: ‘Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heav- en’ (Matthew 18:3). Mark snig- gered. ‘Me? A theoretical physi- cist, a lecturer? I’m a grown man, how can I become a child?’ The priest then began to pray that dreaded prayer, the Rosary, and everybody except Mark – joined in. The next two weeks were the longest of Mark’s life. Except for the grotto at Massabielle, he saw nothing of the French Pyrenees, nor did he see Portugal’s rich countryside; in Knock it rained solidly for three days.

Home at Last!

He was never happier than when he arrived home and was done with that Catholic devotion. ‘What’s this about the Rosary?’ Mark interrogated his wife. ‘In all three shrines, Mary is said to have appeared and either asked the three children to pray the Rosary, as at Fatima, or said the Rosary with fourteen-year-old Bernadette, or watched on as the rain-drenched Irish prayed the Rosary! The vain repetition of these prayers over-and-over-again is nonsense, Hail Mary, Hail Mary! Our Father, Our Father! Glory be, Glory be! No intelligent God could ever wish this! And chil- dren? Sure, what could their little minds know about God?’ Mark was infuriated with his wife for wasting his time, and she became very disheartened.

Suddenly, little Alex burst into the room shouting, ‘Mama, Mama, Mama!’ and, looking at Mark, ‘Papa, Papa, Papa!’ Over-and- over-again, little Alex kept repeat- ing until he took his beaker from the kitchen counter, and, looking at both his parents, he smiled, ‘Tata, Tata, Tata!’ Mark’s wife rejoiced that Alex had finally learnt to speak, but Mark was frozen. For a little light flickered inside his head, and he heard those words of Scripture ever so clearly, ‘Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like chil- dren, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven’ (Matthew 18:3). Little Alex taught Mark the greatest lesson of his life, that the way to God is to depend on him like a child and that the perfect prayer to express this childlike dependence is to address God as our Father and Mary as our Mother through the solemn repe- titions of the Most Holy Rosary of the Blessed Virgin Mary.

Charles Stewart Parnell’s funeral – October 11 1891 A Funeral Fit For A King Marie Therese Cryan

reland has proclaimed herself a proud Republic since 1949. On 16 April of that year the country left the Commonwealth of Nations and no longer recognised the English Monarch. It seemed we were done with the pomp and the power of kings and queens. However, there was one man who became the most effective Irish nationalist leader since Daniel O’Connell, leaving such a mark on the history of this country that he has been described as, the Uncrowned King of Ireland’.

Charles Stewart Parnell (1837-91) was the dominant Irish political fig-
ure of the late nineteenth century. With his campaigns for land reform and Home Rule, he changed forev- er Ireland’s relationship with Britain and re-shaped north-south relations on the island.

He was the chief source of inspi- ration of both a radical land reform movement and a nationalist party which, through its demand for par- liamentary devolution (Home Rule), polarised the political debate in the United Kingdom. This brought about the split of one of the two major parties, the Liberals, and the realignment of the other the Tories, who refashioned themselves

as a permanent coalition between Conservatives and Liberal Union- ists. His campaigns inspired reform- ers in both Scotland and Wales and galvanised nationalists in India.

A Great Man Falls

Born in Avondale, Co Wicklow, he was an Irish “Tory’ by temperament and a member of the Ascendancy linked (through his mother Delia) to the U.S. Protestant elite. His great-grandmother belonged to the Tudor family, so somewhat fitting- ly the uncrowned king’ had a dis- tant relationship with the British royal family. He was in many respects a stereotypical member of the Anglo-Irish gentry – closer to his British counterparts than to the Irish tenant farmers for whose interests he fought. Certainly, though opposed to his policies the

IT HAPPENED THIS MONTH

former recognised him as a fellow gentleman. When he was elect- ed to the British House of Commons in April 1875 it was as a Nationalist M.P. His Home Rule party, the Irish Parliamentary Party struggled for the moral high ground with revolutionary national- ists like the Irish Republican Brotherhood, but in 1885 they held the balance of power in Westmin- ster and his support of the Liberal government was conditional on Home Rule being adopted for Ireland.

At the height of his success, a personal scandal which revealed that he had been having a long-time affair with a married woman, Katherine O’Shea irrevocably damaged his reputation and career.

His refusal to step down after Mrs O’Shea’s sensational divorce case produced bitter division. Meetings of the IPP were held in December 1890; after long and acrimonious discussions as to whether the man (Parnell) was more important than the cause (Home Rule) the party split, and Parnell lost his leader- ship.

Less than a year later he was dead. When he died suddenly at his home in Brighton October 6, 1891, he was only forty-six years of age. Some of his supporters, who were in London, went to Brighton as soon as they got news of his death. They included John Redmond who

The funeral of Charles Stewart Parnell was the largest seen since the death of Daniel O’Connell nearly fifty years previously.
took charge of the arrangements for the funeral and who, eventually, was to become the last leader of a reunited Irish Party at Westminster. Katherine, whom Parnell had since married, wanted a private funeral, but she was persuaded that he should be given a public funeral in Dublin.

Sad October Day

The mortal remains of Charles Stewart Parnell returned to Ireland on the mail boat on Sunday morn- ing, October 11, 1891. The burial was to take place in Glasnevin Cemetery. Parnell was a Protestant, and his family favoured Mount Jerome for his final resting place. Glasnevin was identified as a Catholic Cemetery though it was not confined to Catholics any more

than Mount Jerome was confined to Protestants. Burials in Glas- nevin, however, were beginning to make a section of it into a shrine of nationalism. O’Connell was buried there as were many notable Fen- ians. Although Parnell was not a Fenian he had harnessed the leader- ship into supporting his Consti- tutional Campaign.

Public funerals of patriots were occasions for the rituals of national- ism rather than for those of religion. The way that the funeral was organised made a powerful politi- cal statement. When the rituals of religion and of nationalism were in harmony, as was the case with O’Connell, the effect was to height- en the harmony. When there was discord, as was the case with Parnell, the effect was to deepen the division. No Catholic clergyman attended the funeral of Parnell in Glasnevin Cemetery.

From Kingstown, as Dun Lao- ghaire was then called, the body of Parnell was taken by train to Westland Row Station. At Westland Row the coffin was draped in a green flag and accompanied by Parnellite M.P.s, it was taken to the City Hall. The funeral procession was led by a band playing the Dead March in Saul and a crowd of about a thousand followed the hearse. The procession halted in Dame Street outside the building which had once housed an Irish Parlia- ment and where the Act of Union had been passed.

At the request of the family a service for the dead was celebrated in St Michan’s Protestant church before the lying-in-state at the City Hall. Long black drapes hung on the building both inside and out- side. The catafalque was placed before the statue of O’Connell in the main hall. The lying-in-state lasted three hours during which time thousands of people filed silently past to pay their last respects.

Mournful Progress

After the lying-in-state the funeral procession began its slow progress through the city to Glasnevin Cemetery. The dirge of the Dead March sounded again and the Parnellite M.P.s once more flanked the hearse A coach carrying the vet- eran Fenians, James Stephens and John O’Leary, followed the family coach. Behind the coaches a huge crowd estimated, at between 20.000 and 40,000, followed with mourn- ing bands on their arms.

A riderless horse with boots reversed in the stirrups followed the hearse, the traditional symbol of the fallen leader. At St Catherine’s Church in Thomas Street, the site of the execution of Robert Emmet, the procession paused for a few moments. It took three hours for the journey from City Hall to Glas- nevin Cemetery. At the graveside two clergymen of the Church of Ireland performed the last rites.

The grave of Parnell became a place of pilgrimage for his faithful followers and the annual Ivy Leaf commemoration began on the anniversary of this death. The imposing monument in O’Connell Street was erected in 1911.

Over his grave a great unhewn block of Wicklow rock was placed on which is inscribed the single word – PARNELL.

The Cloister Garden

Frater Fiachra

Cloister Irises

If you hear a voice within you say, “you cannot paint, then by a means paint, and that voice will be silenced.” – Vincent Van Gogh. A garden is like a painting. Vibrant and mild colours in their proper places, heights and lows, billowing and flow- ing, sharp and dainty. Following from last month’s article on the majestic Iris I have been thinking a lot about a won- derful painting by Vincent Van Gogh called the Iris which is in the

J. Paul Getty Museum in Los Angeles. The life of Vincent Van Gogh is tragic in so many ways, but he was gifted in his painting despite his continuous mental problems

One year before his death and a year after he mutilated his ear, Vincent entered Saint Paul de Mausole, an asylum in Saint-Rémy, on March 30, 1890, originally a 12th-century Augustinian monastery with a splendid cloister and garden. He was allowed a second room as a stu- dio to paint. But what to paint? On the first morning he spotted some irises.

For Vincent painting was “the lightning conductor for the illness”; he could keep himself from going insane by continuing to paint. He would over the course of his stay paint almost 130 paintings among which his “Irises” is the most famous and valuable.

If you look closer at this painting, you can observe that each flower is unique. Van Gogh carefully studied their movements and shapes to create a variety of silhouettes.

Working in the walled garden was Vincent’s one source of comfort and pleasure. His fellow inmates came to watch him, and his artistic presence brought some calm and distraction to all who suffered around him.

The irises in all their splendour were a relief for Vincent, the strik- ing brilliance in the cloister garden contrasted with the grey enclosure walls. The deep purple reminded him of his own darkness within and the twisted roots of the thoughts and worries that choked his mind.

Amid the array of purple irises one white iris stands out echoing hope. Some commentators read into the painting that the irises are indeed the inmates and that the white iris is Vincent, others see it as a sign of hope-filled recovery and normality and indeed the colour of peace.

In the midst of his pain and excruciating mental suffering, Vincent Van Gogh would pro- duce one of the most valuable and famous paintings in the world. In the midst of a cloister garden, a light of sanity and security shone in the Iris flower for one of the world’s greatest artists. Let us all look closely at the wonders of creation in our gardens, let us see in the plants and blooms our own sufferings and amidst that suffering a sign of hope, a beacon of light and a joy that radiates through flowers.

the beginning of our life in bour than to break the bread of the Athe Order, we were asked one word of God, to share with him the question: “What do you seek?”; we prostrated, and with our noses on the floor of the church, we respond ed: “God’s mercy and yours”.

We are Dominicans because of God’s mercy. If our lives as Dominicans began with that primordial desire to obtain mercy, then our ministry of preaching in different forms, as Dominicans, ought to proceed from the same impetus. The ministry of the Word, the Order’s charism to preach Jesus, is in fact a sublime work of mercy, an act of charity. Pope Benedict XVI said that “the greatest act of charity is evange- lization…There is no action more beneficial and therefore more charitable towards one’s neigh-

Good News of the Gospel, to intro- duce him or her to a relationship with God”. It is no wonder then that our motto “Veritas” could also be understood as “Passion for the Truth and Compassion for Humanity”. Today, we thank the Lord for the gift of 800 years of Dominican presence and preaching here in Ireland.

Thanks to God’s unending grace, our Dominican confreres brought and continue to bring the Gospel to countless persons here in Ireland and beyond this beautiful island. It is tempting to think that your endurance and growth as a province concretely indicates how much God loves you. To a signifi- cant sense, that is true. But the

number of friars and the thousands of people you serve are an indica- tion of how God provides (pro- videre), ie, foresees, not your needs, but the needs of the Church and the world.

You have founded the provinces of Australia and India, the former is a continent and the latter is a sub- continent. The sons of the province of Ireland went to the Caribbean and the Americas as missionaries. The province of Hibernia was sup- pressed, persecuted, but it never hibernated.

Ever Ancient and New

Many years ago, I attended a gathering of religious brothers and sisters in initial formation. I proudly introduced myself as a Dominican. In jest, one partici- pant replied: “Dominican? You are medieval!” I responded with a smile: “We are not medieval, we are classical!”

A “classic” is at once timeless and timely. It is timeless not because it lies beyond the vicissi- tudes of history, but because it becomes an event of meaning in every moment of history. St. Dominic embraced a mission that is timely, because he saw a world in dire need of a new evangeliza- tion; yet the same mission is truly timeless, because every genera- tion is in want of a new evange- lization, i.e., the preaching of God who is ever ancient, yet ever new.

Sheep and Fish

We are in the Order in response to the call of Jesus, “come follow Me”. We realized that this vocation also entails following Him who tells us: “if you love me, feed my sheep.” In imitation of the Good Shepherd, we “leave the ninety- nine to seek the one sheep who is lost”. But in our time, it seems that the reverse is happening in some parts of the world, only a few remain in the sheepfold and, some- times, it is the “ninety-nine” who have left our churches! Thus, in our world today, we need to remember another meta- phor for our vocation. Before Jesus asked Peter “to feed the sheep” (John 21:15-19), he told him “Come, follow me, and I will send you out to fish for people” (Matthew 4:19).

The vocation of “shepherds” and “fishermen” are complementary but different. A shepherd is usually entrusted with a flock, nurtures them, and accompanies them in their journey of faith.

On the other hand, a fisherman, by nature, is more audacious and ardent than a shepherd. He must go out to catch new fish every day! A shepherd cares for his flock. A good shepherd knows his sheep, and the sheep rec- ognize his voice.

On the other hand, the fisherman looks out for fish every day. The fish are in the waters, sometimes deep waters and the fisherman goes out to seek them out. Jesus chose

his apostles not only to shepherd his people, but to go forth to fish for people from all nations. Perhaps, our mission today is more analo- gous to that of fishermen than just shepherds. Perhaps there is inertia in many parts of the world today because as one author wrote: “Too many Christians are no longer ‘fishers of men’ but keepers of the aquarium.”

Fishers of Men

However, while one shepherd can live in isolation apart from other shepherds, fishermen need to work together as a team to catch fish with large nets. Peter was not work- ing alone when the Lord told him: Duc in altum, “Put out into deep water and lower your nets for a catch”. (Luke 5: 4-11). Fishermen must go where the fish are.

We must “go out into the world and preach the Good News!” To catch “netizens” we must go to the “digi- tal continent”. Fishermen know that one of the rules of fishing is “not to scare the fish away”. To catch fish, we must understand that some fish must be lured with a bait, some need to be fed, some need to be netted. We must truthfully ask ourselves what are the things in the way we live and the way we preach that drive people away?

And finally, fishermen know how to be patient and wait for God’s grace to work on people. Just as a fisherman cannot force the fish to come, so we cannot force people to come. Peter and John and their companions caught nothing all night. But when they listened to the instruction of Jesus, they caught a large haul of fish!

To be fishers of men, we must listen to the voice of Jesus through our prayer and con- templation. We must act promptly when he tells us to throw our nets to the other side of the boat (Luke 5:4- 11, John 21:6), to be ready when God’s grace touches the hearts of people.

I hope and pray that in the com- ing years you will find concrete ways “to mend your nets” just as James and John were “mending their nets” when Jesus called them. “Mending the nets” of the province does not only mean repairing a part that is torn, it also means to restore, to improve, to perfect, and to adjust the nets so that you can cast them into the deep, duc in altum!

Paul (Pope Paul VI to the United Nations General Assembly, 1965) aul VI was speaking in a decade of almost apocalyptic tension, when the threat of total war loomed large over mankind, and near total destruction of all that mankind was and knew hov- ered on the horizon like storm clouds inexorably advancing.

But now, almost 60 years later, and leaving behind a century which has seen the devastation of the wars of nations, great and small, the world and civilization again watches a terrible drama being played out in global the- atres of war. More than ever, we turn to Mary, Mother of God and Queen of Peace!

The rich texts of this votive Mass focus us, as one would expect, on Christ who not only announces peace and brings peace but is Peace. The Entrance Antiphon recalls the prophecy of Isaiah, looking forward to the great sign, the inbreaking of Peace made possible by the Virgin’s consent: A child is born for us, a son is given to us, and he shall be called “Prince of Peace”. The echoes of the Christmas mys- teries ring out for us, and the cen- tral celebration that the Incar- nation is

the moment of a univer- sal declaration of peace, for all times and places and peoples: Glory to God in the highest heav- en, and peace to people who enjoy his favour! The Collect focuses us further and is a most earnest plea on our part: grant that our times may be tranquil, so that we may live in peace as one family, united in love for one another.

The truth of the paradoxical fragmentation of the human family, contra- dicting the idea that humani- ty has become the inhabitant of a global village, stares us in the face. We are not a family united by common principles, values, outlooks or objectives.

Increasingly, personal and societal selfish- ness has diminished our sense of equality of person- hood and nationhood, of an essential autonomy enjoyed by the individual and his respective communities, but which at the same

Time demands that an indis- pensable interdependence, a nec- essary fragility and vulnerability, and the overriding moral obliga- tion that the strong have a duty to support and protect the weak are the pivots about which a healthy human society revolves. The magnitude of our disdain for one another is almost overwhelming! Mary Our Example In the midst of this we, in this memorial celebration, are drawn back to the defining reality of our

faith: Lord, as we lovingly vener- ate Blessed Mary ever-Virgin, as Queen of Peace, we offer you the sacrifice of our reconciliation. As the Preface will do for us, we are asked to reflect on the mys- tery of Christ in three moments, in which Mary leads us by exam- ple: the mystery of the Word becoming flesh, the mystery of his Passion, and the mystery of the giving of his Spirit at Pentecost. Mary’s word of consent to the angel, and so to God ultimately, opens the way for the Prince of Peace to take flesh in her virginal womb.

In this sense, Mary is not only Queen of Peace but, as we have said, Mother of Peace also she is the one who gives birth to Peace, and a peace which is not of this world, but is supremely the gift of the Trinity’s own life. She is witness to the shedding of Christ’s blood on the Cross the blood of the new covenant. This is the language of the cross, as St Paul tells us, and the lan- guage which demands that becoming, because of our participation in this single once-and-for-all sacrifice, ministers of reconciliation, ambassadors for Christ.

And lastly, with Pentecost, for which Mary waited in company and prayer with the Apostles, the gift of Christ’s Spirit brings peace and joy, the signs of the resurrection, and the birth of the Church, messenger of the new kingdom of peace.

More than ever, in dark days of war, conflict, and threat to our very existence, we invoke Mary, Mother of God and Queen of Peace!

Mama and i mean ons, and on Outside the gates of the monastery; Lima was one occasion one of them taken ill in a city many miles away; nothing seemed to ease his pain.

No matter what treatment he tried, no matter what doctor he consulted, nothing worked so finally he decid- ed there was only one remaining course open to him. He would cut short his business and return with- out delay to Lima and ask Brother Martin to take him in hand and cure him, for he believed there was no doctor to compare with the Dominican brother.

On the journey he was unable to walk because his leg was terribly swollen. The jogging of his horse along the rough dusty roads did nothing to relieve his pain but he was determined to see Brother Martin, even though he felt wretched and often had to grit his teeth to keep back a moan of anguish.

At length, he arrived at the out- skirts of Lima at dusk and made his
he saw the white-clad figure of a Dominican priest and immediately asked to see Brother Martin.

The reply made his heart sink in dismay. “I am sorry,” said the priest, “Brother Martin left this morning for the Priory farm in Limatambo and we do not expect him back for another two or three days.”

With little or no money in his pocket, nowhere to stay for the night, the only thing he could do- was to set off for Limatambo, even though he knew it was more than twenty miles distant from Lima.

Almost immediately his feet and legs began to give him trouble and before very long each leg had swollen until they were almost as thick as his body. Eventually unable to continue any longer and seeing a small cave

in the hillside, he dis- mounted from his horse and stum- bled inside. Wrapping his cloak around himself, and wishing to God Martin was there he fell asleep.

A Friend in Need

Suddenly he awoke to feel some- body gently touching the cape with a stick, and the voice of Martin came to his ears, “My poor friend, where are you going?” The answer came through tears, “I was looking for you Brother Martin and came back to try and see you and I wanted your blessing.

I felt sure I would die unless I saw you, but how did you know that I was here?” Martin only smiled. “Do not worry,” he said softly, have confidence in God and your illness will soon pass.” Then, putting his hand into the pocket of his habit he took out some bread and grapes bidding his friend to eat.

Martin then peered closely at the sick man and murmured: “Lord, do not let this man die this time. I hope in Your Infinite Mercy You will grant this request.” He placed his hands upon the swollen legs and began to massage them gently, saying in a half- whisper:

“Lord, please make these legs be restored to health quickly.” After another few moments he began to bend the swollen knees gently, making the Sign of the Cross over them many times.

Soon afterwards Martin got to his feet saying gently: “Get up now, It is time we continued on our way to the farm of Limatambo.” The poor man tried to tell him he still felt too weak to move, but Martin would not listen and insisted on helping him on to the horse again. Taking the halter, he led them out of the cave and on to the roadside. Ever so slowly they continued their progress.

They had hardly gone a quarter of a mile down the road when the man on the horse became suddenly aware that all pain had disappeared from his legs. The swelling had also gone, and he felt as well as he had ever done in his whole life.

What had happened remained engraved on his memory until the day he died. Of course, Martin never mentioned it again.

Saint Martin Replies

WESTMEATH I wish to thank St Martin for many health favours especially when I was diagnosed with cancer of the womb which was removed but meant I had to have a hysterectomy. A few weeks before the operation I was on the way home from a walk in the coun- tryside and I saw a Novena Book at the edge of the road. I brought it home as I knew immediately it was a sign from God. I began the Novena and all went well with no further cancer found.

ROSCOMMON I am writing to thank my dear friend St Martin to whom I was doing a Novena for one of my daughters that a success- ful outcome to a problem hanging over her for the past few years would be found. All went well and I cannot describe the joy in our hearts and total gratitude we are feeling. Don’t ever give up on prayer. I knew well that St Martin would intercede on my behalf.

CORK I wish to report many favours granted through the inter- cession of St Martin, St Joseph and them for a long time for my daugh- ter who has several troubles, but now things are slowly coming right for her; also, my son who is now the father of a healthy little baby boy after years of waiting. All my life

I have turned to St Martin for guidance, during years working when I was never sure which road to take and when I retired in getting accommodation for me. I will be forever grateful for all the answers to many many prayers.

WEXFORD I wish to thank St Martin for so many favours received, including getting over a marriage which had failed, as well as a business. Also, for interceding for my son to find a good job and for helping me through financial difficulties. I have so many reasons to be grateful to him and I will con- tinue to pray to him for the rest of my life.

GALWAY I want to thank St Martin and others too numerous to mention for answering my prayers for my grandson who was born pre- St Anthony. I have been praying to maturely 6 years ago. For health to reasons he had to undergo numerous operations. After his last procedure which was not a success the surgeon said it would have to be done again.

We were all so upset and prayed very hard. Just before operating the surgeon checked again and could not believe that every- thing had changed, and an operation
would not be needed after all. A Little Miracle… the power of prayer is God’s grace.

Jesus We Talk About God Or “God”?

Jesus We Talk About God Or “God”?

Dear Thomas,

Before I begin answering your questions, I think it would be best to give you a perspective on why I believe in and relate to Jesus Christ the way I do. There are a lot of belief systems out there and an awful lot of variety within any particular belief system.

Thus, I first want to express not primarily a belief system but more of an affirmation of my own reality based relationship with God through Jesus Christ.

One of the difficulties in talking about the reality ofGod or in talking about having a relationship with Him is deciding how to put it into words. It reminds me of those times when a young adult says to his parent, “How do you know when you are in love?”

The answer is often, “When you are, you will know it.” For centuries much philosophical language has been developed around the idea of God. Even saying idea suggests a mental construct that develops into possible or faith-based truth claims about God.

Such claims have developed into a wide variety of belief systems, all of which have tried to establish meaning to life versus the alternative of meaninglessness.

Man seems inherently hardwired to think that there is something more than just himself. For me this is more than just human nature looking for meaning in our existence. I certainly believe that humanness should count for something and that humankind has intrinsic value.

Thus, religion in whatever form becomes the bridge from meaninglessness to meaningfulness and the path from mortality to some form of immortality. Outside of the personal relationship that I will talk about, a religion or in philosophical language a belief system is judged as a group effort to explain unseen causes and effects.

Religious beliefs are thought by many sociologists and other thinkers to be culturally devised and thus developed over time to guide the culture with its histories and social forms toward a perceived relationship with a transcendent being or beings with superhuman attributes.

If our humanness occurs by evolutionary process rather than the result of being created by design, our meaningfulncss and worth arc largely a finite product of chance and genetic variation.

Yet there is that inherent ability in humanness that can raise and answer questions as well as analyze ourselves, our environments, and our relationships.

Man performs acts of will, experiences love, defines good and evil, attaches meaning to feelings, experiences phenomena or miracles, and exercises a faith that surpasses the concrete. How can we explain that?

Some thinkers, past and present, have tried on ideas about God and concluded that He is only a human construct of one s mind that is commonlly accepted.

Wherein, many claim that He has failed them in that they desired an immediate response from the God or gods of their personal cultural understanding, but to no avail.

Other thinkers have embraced the idea ofGod as a way to explain why there is anything at all. When man can’t explain something, he wraps up the unexplainable into his ideas about God.

Thus, man’s ideas about God have been a moving target as man’s knowledge and understanding have changed throughout the ages.

Still, God remains as an abstract human thought concretely experienced. Thus, any knowing is a subjective, faith-based knowing in which God becomes knowable to us by experience and observation.

No one can prove God. The only possibility of experiencing Him is subjectively, though often this is objectively verified or logically deduced.

There are those who say, “I have tried God as a relational transcendent being, but it came to nothing.” Others claim, “When I thought about God as an infinite, omnipresent (ever-present), omniscient (all-knowing), omnipotent (all-powerful) Creator God, it felt like abstract speculation.”

Still, others study the many varied religious beliefs and conclude that God is nothing more than a shifting superstition and that there really isn’t anything out there.

For many other people, however, life would be meaningless without a God, but is that reason to assert that God must exist? The existence of God can’t be based simply on the fact that we want it to be true.

When we feel we fail in our attempts to experience God personally, we become disappointed with God or anyone clse’s ideas about God.Yet the belief in a transcendent God echoes throughout human history.

There must be a way to explain and possibly experience God outside of another’s personal experience or testimony of spiritual connectedness.

There surely must be a way to explain how and why so many people believe in an invisible, inaudible God. It is here that the minds of philosophers and psychologists play.

But in their playing, it seems to me they are too often like someone talking about being a parent without ever having had a child or like single people who offer counseling about marriage though they have never had a spouse.

It is here, too, that theologians struggle to articulate. For the person to whom God has revealed Himself because of their free will choice, religion becomes the means of expressing that encounter.

For the person to whom God has not yet revealed Himself or the person who chooses not to see or believe in a revelation, religion may serve only an existential, communal, and social function. The lines between these too often get blurred.

Have philosophers and psychologists been able to explain away evidence of the notion that God reveals Himself to individual human beings? Yes, indeed. Philosophical and psychological theories have sought to unmake God.

Despite human need, desire, and introspection, despite a universal longing for meaning and purpose in life, many have concluded that human existence is insignificant, comes to nothingness, and is thus without any cosmic design or purpose.

This differs greatly from the believer’s conclusion that life has tremendous meaning precisely because of cosmic design and purpose through the One who stands behind it.

I think it is a tragic twist when meaninglessness becomes the appropriate understanding of life when God becomes nothing more than a myth in striving for meaning.

This God myth, however, is thought by others to be inappropriate when one is looking at the natural world and the uniqueness of humankind.

If there is no God, then what? If things are, what is the cause? Can there be such a thing as an uncaused cause? So even though God remains invisible and is thought to be silent, God still exists for many as the necessary framework for their own existence. The idea of God is the file into which they throw the unexplainable, the unknowable, and the mystical.

Is religious belief an imaginative invention of those who simply don’t have the moral courage to accept the fact that life is meaningless? There does seem to be a psychological impulse or need to have a God who will rescue us from hurt, pain, chaos, randomness, and meaninglessness.

Thus, the idea of God can be loaded with psychological baggage. Whether we want a god to be there or not in order to manage the brokenness and meaninglessness of life, it seems to some that we must invent a god.

An explanation for how and why people develop their beliefs about God fascinates philosophers and psychologists as much as it does theologians. Beyond that, though, they wonder, When the idea of God is accepted, what kind of god is God?

And if He does exist, how does He interact with humankind and us as individuals? Except for those who have thrown out the idea of God altogether, this has been an active query.

It is my hope that the totality of our correspondence will help answer some of the inevitable questions that arise when people are talking about God. Oftentimes quick short answers do not satisfy. Such questions about God and the answers might include the following:

  • What is God up to? The short answer is that He is always working to have a continuous, long-term relationship with His creation.
  • What is His purpose? The short answer is that with our total freedom, He wants us to express our love back to Him.
  • Is God perfect or flawed? The short answer is that in every way He is perfect, even though we and our world are imperfect, broken, and flawed.
  • If God is perfect, is that perfection static? The short answer is no, it is continuously active.
  • Is His perfection dynamic with interaction and intention? The short answer is that it always is!
  • Is God sovereign? The short answer is that He absolutely is!
  • If God is sovereign and perfect, what happens to humans who are exposed to His perfection and sovereignty when they are neither perfect nor sovereign? The short answer is that when we are fully exposed to that sovereign perfection, we ultimately cease to exist unless we accept His grace, forgiveness, and love.
  • Is God relational? The short answer is that He is continuous.
  • If God is relational, how is He relational? The short answer is that He is relational in Spirit and truth.
  • If human beings could be compared to a vast grove of aspen trees interconnected as one organism, would God relate to the whole grove, to individual trees, or to both? The short answer is both.
  • If humans could be compared to a single mass structure of army ants considered as one living, interrelated organism, does God become personal to the whole army, as in the biblical Israel, or to individual ants like Abraham, Moses, Isaiah, Hosea, David, or John and Paul? The short answer is both.

The problem with this list of questions is that it poses another question. Can we just vicariously experience God, or do we have to experience Him personally in order to come to the truth about Him or ourselves in a relationship with Him?

Let me say that a vicarious experience of God is often the pathway to the personal experience. Both vicarious and personal experiences are different from simply having intellectual knowledge about God.

It seems to me that the human psyche works at giving meaning to our humanness. There are always those age-old questions. Where did we come from? What are we doing here? Where are we going? Such questions haunt the active mind.

It is more than the struggle to find meaning and overcome such feelings of separation, loneliness, alienation, apprehension, meaninglessness, or low self-worth. It is more than just an effort to go back to a place of safety and security, a place like the lost Eden of man’s beginning.

It is more than finding bliss in this world or fantasizing about the next. We are meant to seek a path of living that will help us actualize our humanness as God intended now and forever. The knowledge and experience of relating to God is the goal of human existence.

If this is our purpose, can we do this without believing in someone greater than ourselves? Is what man understands about God the means to his end, or is God the means to man’s ultimate end? I think the latter.

God is, as Scripture testifies, constantly descending, ever-present, always inviting, and continuously waiting for man to open up to His presence. If this is the case, then the question of who God is and who Jesus Christ is to us is the most important question of all.

For me, the deep questions boil down to this: Does a man go it alone in his known universe, or is there a redemptive, personal, relational, agape-loving Creator God who involves Himself in and with His creation?

If man constructs a god as a remedy for meaninglessness and as a comfortable alternative to going it alone, I would spell such a god with a lowercase g, for in that case god has become a means to man’s own ends.

How does a person determine whether his professed god is god or GW? As history shows, when god is a mental construct to combat meaninglessness, it can take many forms.

I don’t think we can prove God with a capital G. However, I do think there is another dimension of knowing beyond what we typically think of as provable. That way is experiencing through revelation.

But linear time puts distance between now and the past experiences of others that are often used to validate our own knowing. It is described in the passage of Scripture that says,

Hebrews 11-1

There are some things that can’t be proven, yet we know them to be true. I call these “truth realities.” Such truths go beyond psychologically induced beliefs. For example, if I tell you that my wife loves me, there is no way I can prove it to you by mere telling.

If you don’t know my wife and you have never seen or met her, you may doubt the truth of my words. Yet I know this truth and experience it. I can know and know that I know the reality of some experiences, even though the evidence is invisible or has been erased by time. That is a by-product of living in linear time that confounds our ability to provide evidence.

If we could live in one another’s moments, we could see that a lot of knowing is valid and neither speculation nor superstition. If we could stop time or move back in time to examine past events, we might well find that much of what is considered religious superstition is in fact true. But linear time does not allow such exploration, so we are left to judge based only on the footprints left from another time.

When Abram heard a voice in the night, when Moses heard instructions out of a burning bush, when the apostle Paul was changed on the Damascus road when Jesus experienced the voice of God at His baptism with John the Baptist at the Jordan River, and when Jesus appeared to the disciples after His resurrection-all who experienced these events were profoundly transformed.

Their lives were forever altered. The historical footprints of those events were not experiences that have altered world history. Yet those captured on video with surround sound and high-definition color where we can study them frame by frame to determine what really happened.

Neither do we have any forensic evidence to study. Furthermore, we don’t have the ability to interrogate the persons involved or subject them to psychological analysis.

Why did Thomas doubt, Peter deny, and Judas betray? We can only conjecture. For some, the passing of linear time has left the doors of doubt and speculation wide open concerning the revelations of God and what they mean.

As individuals, we can also experience events or see revelations in nature that tell us about God. Once the event passes or the wonderment of nature subsides, the experience remains as a personal footprint for us to contemplate its truth and its meaning.

The footprints that remain go through the filters of our minds, leaving us to make choices about what to do with them. Hopefully, we don’t fall into what the apostle Paul was talking about in Romans 1:20-23 where he says,

For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.

For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images.

But not all take that turn. There are those who come face-to-face with an experience of God’s revelation and choose to honor it. These are free choices, yet they have significant and life-changing consequences.

Those who choose not to give credence to a God who reveals Himself are led to the understanding that life is ultimately meaningless, just a biological accident in which they search for the means to make the most of it and in the process often create their own god (spelled with a small g).

Those who choose to give credence to a God who reveals Himself and honor that revelation find themselves led to a connection with a gracious, loving, relational, transcendent God.

It is a discovery that life in relationship with Him has purpose and meaning. It is the discovery that there is a Creator God who is doing something.

And we as individuals can participate in that something if we choose. It is the difference between a god construct as man’s means to an end and God as the means to man’s end. It is a reflection of a bumper sticker that reads, “God is dead. —Nietzsche. Nietzsche is dead God.”

The self-revealing God I talk about throughout my letters is one who leaves footprints over time in people’s lives. He has certainly left them in mine! Let me tell you a story about a personal experience that has left one of those footprints in time, one that has had a profound impact on my life.

If you assume I do not lie and that the experience was absolutely real in every aspect, then you get to make a choice. You can choose to believe it was only a psychological or psychosomatic phenomenon misinterpreted because of a predisposition on my part.

You can remain firm in your conviction that the God I reference and experienced is the lowercase god. Or you can choose to believe that this was an encounter with God as He chose to reveal Himself to me at that time, in that way, and in that event. This is the story of that experience.

The summer before my senior year in college, I had the privilege of obtaining a summer scholarship at a Christian-sponsored summer camp. I had the responsibility of leading the boys in my cabin (a different set of eight every two weeks) to a relationship with Jesus, but to my understanding, I was nothing short of a failure in reaching that goal.

All the other camp leaders had some of the boys in their cabins come forward to profess their belief in Jesus Christ as their personal Lord and Savior at Friday night campfire services, but none of my boys ever did.

At this time in my life, I knew that as soon as my senior year in college was over, I would be drafted into the army for a two-year tour of duty, the Vietnam War staring right at me.

I could opt to go on for a master’s degree, but I wasn’t sure what area I would study. If I instead went into the army and completed my two years of service, I still did not know what I would do for a career after my discharge. Though my undergraduate degree would be in teaching, l had discovered that the classroom didn’t appeal to me.

To top it all off* my college sweetheart had broken off our relationship when she decided to go overseas. With li all this uncertainty in my life, I felt I was sinking into a black hole of unknowns.

I felt like a failure, all alone, isolated, scared of life, and very depressed. I felt like giving up on everything. My conclusion was that I just wasn’t making it in life, I knew I needed help. 1 needed someone to guide me through the big issues of life.

I was plagued with questions. How could I serve God when my serving seemed to be fruitless? How would I now look for and choose a life mate? What would I do about further education and the war? What should I do concerning a career?

I certainly believed that God answered my prayers. I had heard and read the stories. I had read enough Scripture to know that God had often honored men with His presence and answered them in that still, small voice.

In fact, with the prophets of old, He had outright talked to them. I asked myself, Why couldn’t He talk to me? After all, I had declared Him my Lord, and I thought I was answering His call on my life. Yet life didn’t seem to be going well. What was wrong? I needed some answers.

The questions continued to roll through my mind. Should I forget my sweetheart overseas, go on with my life, and look for another? Was it really over? I knew that I was in love with her, but she had left and given no indication when she might be coming back.

Should I go on with my education and hold off on my army tour of duty? What career path should I follow? I needed to know the answers to these questions now, for each decision would be life-altering, but I just wasn’t up to it. I knew I had free will, but what was God’s will for my life? Did He even have one?

I thought it was time to press the Lord for answers. I wanted real and specific answers to each of my questions. It seemed rational to conceive of God talking to me in some form. I knew I believed that if I persisted in prayer, He would honor me.

Matthew 7-7-8

So I decided at dusk on an evening between camp groups to go to a beautiful spot beside a river about half a mile from camp. I sat down on a boulder, listened to t lie water rushing over the rocks for a few moments, and then began my prayer. I thanked Him for coming into my life so many years earlier. I talked through the many experiences and answered prayers of my past.

I then audibly poured out to the Lord everything that was on my mind all my failures, my dashed hopes, my fears, and questions about my future.

I let the Lord know that I knew He could speak however He wanted as long as it was now! I just didn’t know what to make of my tomorrows, and I didn’t like the prospects of them, judging from my yesterdays.

After my long prayer and affirmation of His faithfulness, I opened my eyes and looked around. But there was only silence, nothing more.

I waited, but still, there was nothing, just more silence. How was the Lord going to speak to me? I didn’t know, as there was only continued silence. Now what?

Again I went into prayer, seeking answers for the things that were on my heart, vowing that I would not leave until He spoke to me and gave me some answers to my questions. Again I opened my eyes.

I waited, but again there was nothing, just silence. The sound of the rushing water still filled my ears, and the tall majestic pine trees still lined the mountain slopes to the river’s edge.

Higher up, large granite cliffs glistened from the light of the moon that was now popping in and out of clouds drifting by. It was getting dark, but I didn’t care. I wanted answers.

I went into prayer again, and again there was nothing, only silence. I repeated that process for some time. Each time I asked the Lord to answer my questions, and each time there was nothing but silence—a terrible, loud silence. What was I going to do? Each time I prayed, there was no answer only silence

I could not—I would not—give up, so I prayed again. At the end of my prayer, something took place that altered my life forever. Jesus did speak to me in a way that I will never forget. He used my own voice to speak out loud to me.

This is what He said: “Matt, look around you. If I created the rocks you are sitting on, the water that is rushing by, the trees, the mountains, the moon, the clouds and stars above, and if I created you also, don’t you think I take care of you? Remember, your responsibility is to live in a relationship with Me one day at a time.”

That was it. That was all He said. He didn’t answer any of my specific questions, yet I knew that He had spoken to me. It was a “knowing that you know,’’ a little like the apostle Paul’s experience on the Damascus road (see Acts 9). Was this experience consistent with the way God communicates?

Those outside belief and looking in might conclude that it was only a psychological anomaly brought on by a psychological need. Those who have experienced such events of revelation would conclude otherwise.

Were my perceptions and conclusions of the experience in error? We faced that time problem again. I can’t take you back to the event and let you see, hear, and experience it for yourself.

And even if I could take you back, would your senses perceive the event in the same way that I did? What emotional bias would you bring to the scene? Would there be a difference for you as a casual observer?

I would have to say that there would be a difference just as the apostle Paul’s experience was different from that of his companions on the Damascus road. And I don’t know how many heard God speaking to Jesus at His baptism,

Mattew 3-17

The experience was mine. It was personal, and it was real. Again I remember distinctly, “Matt, look around you. If I created the rocks you are sitting on, the water that is rushing by, the trees, the mountains, the moon, the clouds and stars above, and if I created you also, don’t you think that I can take care of you? Remember, your responsibility is to live in a relationship with Me one day at a time.”

With that message impressed on my mind, I waited a few moments in contemplation. Then with tears running down my face, I thanked the Lord for honoring me with His presence and speaking to me so directly and vividly. I got up and started back to camp.

By now it was getting dark. There was not much moonlight anymore, and I had forgotten to bring a flashlight. Additionally, a number of bears frequented the camp area, always looking for food.

I was alone. It was dark in the woods, and I really couldn’t see the trail leading back to camp. My apprehension level was a six when I heard something rustling in the woods close to me. I froze.

Alarmed and frightened with my heart pumping furiously, I felt my emotions skyrocketing to a ten! I couldn’t see anything at first. What was I going to do? There was no place to run, and it was really dark. What was that noise near me?

Suddenly I saw something in the trail just ahead of me. It was a fox with spots of almost-white molting fur on his sides and tail. I had seen him around camp a few times. I was only about ten yards in front of me.

After a few moments, the animal turned and slowly walked away from me until he was just about out of sight. Then he stopped. I stepped forward, but the lie didn’t move, staying on the trail as though he was waiting for me.

I stopped when I was again about ten yards from him. Again he walked slowly down the trail until he was almost out of sight, and again I cautiously followed. The process repeated itself all the way to the point where I could see an outside light on one of the camp cabins.

As soon as I had a hint of where I was and could make my way back to camp, the fox turned and disappeared into the woods. “Matt, don’t you think that I can take care of you?” resounded in my heart and mind.

When I think back on this experience, what amazes me is that I had just had an epiphany on the rock moments before, yet I immediately forgot the words God had spoken to me. Fear gripped me, and my emotions took over.

But still, God was gracious beyond belief. He used the fox to emphasize to me that what He had just said was true. He could indeed take care of me. I have never forgotten that experience.

In that life-changing encounter, I did not receive even one answer to my questions. But I did receive a promise that no matter what happened, the Lord would take care of me.

How much more valuable that answer has been throughout my life than what I asked for! The revelation, subjective in the words, was made objective by the fox. Was that religious superstition to the point of a psychosomatic phenomenon? Not a chance!

I suspect that the apostle Paul would likely agree. The words spoken to him on that Damascus road may have been for his ears only, yet the scales of blindness and their removal a few days later objectified the reality of that experience.

The angel’s words to Mary were certainly objectified in the birth of Jesus. The words of warning to Adam and Eve were certainly objectified to them as well as to all of us throughout the ages.

As is so often the case, an individual’s experience of God revealing Himself is given through a subjective experience that is affirmed by a likewise personal, objectifying experience.

Think of Moses, Daniel, Gideon, Sampson, or Hosea. Remember the disciples’ many experiences. Recall Peter’s denial of Christ and the subsequent crowing of the rooster and Mary’s encounter at Jesus’ tomb on the Sunday morning after His crucifixion.

To anyone outside the experience, the event could be labeled as superstition, folklore, or speculation. But to the person inside the experience, it was a footprint of a subjective revelation of God affirmed by a physical, objective experience.

I wish I could take those who stand outside of belief in such experiences back in time to that rock beside the river. But I can only offer the footprint of the experience. It is for each person to choose what to do with the telling of my experience.

That is likewise true for all the events of God revealing Himself as expressed throughout Scripture and by persons of faith throughout the ages. That seems to be the way it is in talking about God. We are free to choose what we believe. And that choice always involves a level of uncertainty and demands an act of faith.

Yet there is ample evidence to make the choice for God spelled with a capital G. Making this choice, however, does not come without facing some issues that result from that choice. The idea that we are thinking, of living human beings who must determine what to do with our lives suggests a certain autonomy.

Choosing God, who is ever-present, all-knowing, and all-powerful, could become an obstacle or threat to that autonomy. If we recognize that He is our Creator and we are His creation and if we acknowledge that He gives meaning and purpose to our lives, choosing to be in a relationship with Him can pose a real threat to our autonomy, living life any way we want.

Embracing God with a capital G also raises the threat of accountability. Just what have we done with this life that has been given to us? That can cause a very real threat of apprehension, low self-worth, or even guilt if we feel we have not measured up. If we want to do our own thing with impunity free of judgment, the last thing we want is to confront the reality of a holy, righteous, self-existing God.

Consequently for the atheist and agnostic, disbelieving in God often seems to be a better alternative. Or at the very least they face the pressure to make god spelled with a small g into a form of their choosing.

The pressure is mitigated only by the answers to questions about the nature and character of God. Again what kind of God is God spelled with a capital G1 It is here that I will try to give reasoned answers in This Jesus We Talk About.

As a Christian believer, I make certain truth claims about the nature and character of God as I have understood and experienced Him. The atheists and agnostics often move to the opposite side of these truth claims. For example, here are some of my truth claims and their opposites.

Truth claim: God exists.

Opposite: God does not exist.

Truth claim: Yahweh was the God of Old Testament Israel.

Opposite: Yahweh, the God of Old Testament Israel, is only a myth and part of Jewish folklore.

Truth claim: Jesus Christ was divine.

Opposite: Jesus Christ was not divine, merely a man.

Truth claim: Jesus Christ physically rose from the dead.

Opposite: The resurrection claim is a myth arising from vested interests.

Truth claim: Jesus was born of a virgin.

Opposite: Jesus was an illegitimate child.

Truth claim: The Bible is God’s primary history of and communication with humanity.

Opposite: The Bible is a myth, allegory, and folklore written for self-serving ends.

Truth claim: Prayer is real communication with the divine.

Opposite: Prayer is merely self-talk to subconscious minds to find solutions for personal desires.

Truth claim: Natural science affirms intelligent design by a Creator God.

Opposite: Natural science disproves God; there is no need for Him.

Truth claim: God creates man out of a desire for companionship.

Opposite: Man creates God for psychological reasons.

Truth claim: The eternal, self-existing God is the first cause of all things.

Opposite: Spontaneous generation explains the existence of
everything.

Truth claim: The fullest discoveries of God’s creativity are found scientifically.

Opposite: God is scientifically useless.

Truth claim: God reveals Himself.

Opposite: God is unknowable.

Truth claim: God demonstrated Himself in Jesus Christ.

Opposite: God cannot be demonstrated.

Truth claim: Revelation affirms or corrects reason and serves as an important basis for belief.

Opposite: Reason is superior to revelation. Revelation is biased through the filter of the mind.

Truth claim: God establishes the fullest nature of our humanness in the agape ethic.

Opposite: People postulate God to ensure a meaningful social ethic.

Truth claim: By and through God we live, move, and have being.

Opposite: There is no ultimate meaning to life.

Truth claim: It is impossible to prove the nonexistence of God.

Opposite: It is impossible to prove the existence of God.

Truth claim: Man has the opportunity for redemption and immortality because of Jesus Christ.

Opposite: Man is destined to nothingness.

Truth claim: Christianity is based on other-centered relationships.

Opposite: All religion, including Christianity, is based on fear.

Truth claim: The origin of the Judalc-Christian religion is a matter of God acting in history.

Opposite: The origin of religion is a matter of psychology and philosophy.

Truth claim: Man is created for God’s ends.

Opposite: God is created for man’s ends.

Truth claim: God is love.

Opposite: God is indifferent.

If a person’s understanding of reality is the collection of the opposites listed previously, then the conclusion that life is finite and meaningless and that man as a conscious living being is destined to nothingness is a reasonable conclusion.

If, on the other hand, a person’s understanding of reality is the collection of Christian truth claims, then the conclusion that life is sacred, full of meaning and purpose, and intimately connected with the divine becomes not just a reasonable conclusion but an experienced reality.

The question can be asked why some of us believe the truth claims while others do not. The alternative to believing them and ignoring God altogether is to develop a construct of god spelled with a small g that fits our needs.

If that is the case, we can perform in a manner to please our created god and find our meaning through our performance with its perceived temporal and future rewards.

So how do we explain an experienced reality in a way that can be meaningful and provide a pathway to another’s experience of the reality of God spelled with a capital G? Let me use this silly illustration: Think about the connectedness to a beloved created by a passionate (other-centered) kiss.

The intimacy and connectedness to the beloved exist outside and beyond any thoughts or study of a kiss. We can study the history of a kiss, analyze the psychology and physiology of a kiss, observe the results of a passionate kiss, develop theories on why people engage in passionate kissing or discuss the different methods of passionate kissing.

We can fantasize and speculate about a passionate kiss, even practice kissing on a mirror or a balloon. We can even engage in pseudo-passionate kissing and consider it nothing more than a way to establish meaning, eliminating the sense of meaninglessness and aloneness.

We can be a bit dull, uneducated, or poor and still experience the connectedness to a beloved with a passionate kiss. We can also be very bright, well-educated, and quite rich in material wealth and similarly experience the connectedness to a beloved with a passionate kiss.

In other words, it doesn’t really matter what the theories are, who does the theorizing, or how creatively someone expresses thoughts about the passionate kiss of a beloved. A kiss is an experiential reality of connectedness to another.

It is both a subjective and objective experience. The connectedness that results is by mutual choice. It is one person revealing to another the language of “I love you.”

As silly as this illustration might be, it yields insight into a God who reveals Himself in love. It reveals a God who is passionate about His connectedness with humankind and each of us as individuals.

It reflects the God who comes to a man in Scripture and in the person of Jesus Christ. It displays the God who comes in the voice of answered prayer and in the evidence of a changed life.

It reflects the God who comes in words and actions for those who experience Him in reason exercised by faith. It affirms the God who continues to come to man for the purpose of love experienced by those who will respond. But that response is always a choice.

It can be a curious thing to be explained, or it can be a reality of connectedness to a self-revealing, eternal, holy, transcendent, redeeming, gracious, loving God who continually descends to us and says in effect,

Matthew 28- 20

In conclusion, for me, there are experienced truth claims within Christianity that affirm a God spelled with a capital G, who reveals Himself and comes to man with good news, as opposed to a god of necessity to give meaning to the otherwise meaninglessness and ultimate nothingness of life.

For me, it is about the God who comes to man and says, “Look around you. If I created the rock you are sitting on, the water that is rushing by, the trees, the mountains, the moon, the clouds and stars above, and if I created you also, don’t you think I can take care of you? Remember, your responsibility is to live in a relationship with Me one day at a time.”

So what is true living? It is to understand and respond to this God through His revelation and His work. I hope that you will be open to the God, who loves and reveals Himself. How He chooses to do that is always an individual and personal experience between you and God.

The when and how is determined by your willingness and readiness and His working within time and circumstances. And His revelation is usually not in the way you expect.

If you are willing and ask God to reveal Himself to you, it will happen. And when it does, you will know that God is spelled with a capital G and is not a god of your own making spelled with a small g.

Your friend,
Matt

Jesus We Talk About Relevance

Jesus We Talk About Relevance

Dear Thomas,

Let me say again how much I thank you for your questions. They show that you have already spent some time thinking about the spiritual dimension of your life as well as the lives of those around you.

your questions cover a very wide range ofspiritual and religious issues and how those issues translate into everyday lives. it will take some thought and study on my part to give you consistent and clear answers.

I have to confess that my answers come from my perspective, experience, and spiritual awareness as expressed in my last letter. If any of my answers to your questions seem too brief, too inadequate, or too religiously esoteric for ease of understanding or if they don’t satisfy your query or just seem to miss the mark, please let me know.

I will also have to say that my answers come from my current knowledge, experience, and understanding. As time goes on, I might answer your questions in a slightly different way, for I am on a journey of discovery myself. but what an exciting adventure!

With that preamble, let me go to your first question. you asked, “Jesus of Nazareth died for sedition —some two thousand years ago on a Roman cross in Jerusalem. how could Jesus’s death two thousand years ago have anything to do with me now?”

The answer is absolutely nothing if Jesus were just another human being like you and me or like Zoroaster, Confucius, Mohammed, Buddha, and other historical religious figures.

In fact, if Jesus were just another charismatic human being, a teacher with a gift for healing and the ability to inspire others to carry on his teachings and sayings, the best we could say is that he was, as history indicates, a significant world personality who changed western civilization and thus world history.

But the same could be said about Buddha or any other person, such as Mohammed, who had a profound effect on the arab world and the Middle East, which in turn is affecting current world history. thus, saying that Jesus was significant isn’t enough.

If Jesus were just another human being, we could say many unflattering things about him. we could say that he wasn’t a very honest man or maybe just self-delusional at best.

certainly, neither his followers nor the world could claim he was moral and ethical if the claims he made about himself were not true.

Jesus’ sayings and claims about himself were significant. let’s take a look at them.

John 11-25

Luke 23- 3

Thus, Jesus claimed to be much more than just another human being like you and me just as the evidence of his actions and the effect of his life testify.

This is the way Jesus, this god-man, intended it to be. As I said in my last letter, the most important question of all is this: who is Jesus?

Now if Jesus were indeed as he claimed and as his life and actions indicate, fully god incarnate yet fully human in the one person Jesus Christ, then the question of the relevance of his death two thousand years ago has very real significance.

It goes to the issue that he didn’t remain dead when He was crucified on a Roman cross. It is an issue that the apostle Paul talks about in 1 Corinthians 15:1-8 when he says, now, brothers, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, which you received and on which you have taken your stand.

By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. otherwise, you have believed in vain. for what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the scriptures, and that he appeared to Peter, and then to the twelve.

After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, and last of all he appeared to me also,

But even if Jesus didn’t stay dead, the question of “what does that death have to do with me now” still remains.to arrive at an answer, we must first ask, “What kind of death did Jesus suffer? was it the same kind of death that you and I experienced because of old age, disease, accident, or at the hands of another? or was it a different kind of death resulting from the fact that Jesus was not just a human being who was dying but god himself joined with us in human form?

Can god be killed like the rest of us? and if he can, would he even be a god in that event?” there was something very different and profound about the union of god and man in Jesus Christ.

Jesus, though god, willingly set aside his divinity, except when and as directed by the Father, and lived as one of us. it was our humanity, our corporate or collective humanity in Jesus Christ, that died on the cross. Jesus said that he laid down his life voluntarily and that no one took it from him by force. Jesus is quoted as saying in

John 10- 17-18

That is a nice claim. but can such a claim be verified when the results of his trial and subsequent hanging on a cross brought about his death? we would have to look at the whole of his life and how that life fits into the entire history of prophetic Hebrew scripture in order to put faith in the voluntary claim.

And if it is true that he voluntarily laid down his life and that he could have stopped the torture of the Roman executioner at any time, so what? how was his death any different from anyone else’s who has gone through unbelievable torture at the hands of unbelievably cruel human beings? this is a tough question to answer in any short way.

your question and my answer will reflect on some of your other questions about creation, the introduction and entrance of evil, sin, rebellion, and the brokenness of this world, which I will just label the “sin problem.”

It also goes to the nature of man, as he inherited certain attributes from his first physical and spiritual parents, Adam and Eve, whose choices and actions led to mankind’s separation and alienation from god.

It also goes to how God planned to correct that separation and alienation. and it goes to the subject of the end of sin and sinners.

with the backdrop of these other issues and subjects, which we will talk about as we address other questions, let me first say that the correction of the sin problem is what the gospel (or good news) of the life, death, and resurrection of jesus christ is all about.

It is the good news of salvation (salvation meaning “preservation from destruction” or “rescue”). if it is going to have any real, significant meaning, this salvation or rescue cannot be for only a select few but must be for all mankind.

Jesus was god’s delivery system for the rescue. the historical reality of Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection nearly two thousand years ago made the ultimate rescue of mankind possible. As the son, the creator himself was born of a woman and came to man.

With our same propensity or bent toward sin common to all and with free will, he lived a perfect relational life with god the Father through the indwelling of the holy spirit and showed us what a restored relationship with the Father would look like.

In addition to that, Adam infected all humanity with sin (one’s chosen separation from god) and thus led us to our ultimate destruction or death, “for the wages [or consequence] of sin is death” nonetheless, god so loved the world that he sent Jesus, the creator of the world, and of Adam and Eve and by extension all humanity, to become the means of our salvation.

Romans 6-23

As the apostle John says, “In the beginning was the word [Jesus], and the word [Jesus] was with god, and the word [Jesus] was god. he was with god in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him, nothing was made that has been made. in him was life, and that life was the light of men.”

John 1- 1-4

Jesus willingly suffered the consequence of human rebellion—not just death on the cross but total separation from god. Jesus, who represented all humanity, was willing to say goodbye to life forever if that was what it took for his creation to have life. in effect, god, in and through Jesus, said, “I love you.

I accept you. I have provided a way for you. I will come to you. I will rescue you. I will heal you. I will be with you. I will ultimately provide a new world for you. I will take my original intention for this world and make it a reality for you in a new world without the effects of sin.” all he asks is that we accept his acceptance and come back into the relationship.

The implication of our acceptance of his acceptance is profound! it is god redeeming the world back to himself. that is what the whole of scripture is about god’s redemptive history and what it took for him to rescue mankind. it is about bringing us back to what Jesus Christ, god incarnate, the creator, intended for us from the beginning.

Now forgive me for getting into a bit of religious language here.I am going to say some things that may sound religiously esoteric, but read it anyway and lay it aside. it will gain meaning as we proceed through your questions. From time to time I’ll refer back to this description of the gospel or, as it is alternatively called, the good news.

Let me say it again. What I want to do over time is to give you a picture of the God I know, love, and admire. I also want to introduce you to Him so that you might know Him personally as you allow Him to reveal Himself to you.

Let me say first that god is absolute love, as expressed in 1 John 4:8 and as expressed in the life of Jesus and throughout the whole of scripture. god runs his universe on the principle of love. he never violates his principle in the context of our ultimate salvation or rescue.

There is also another operative at work in this world that will explain a lot of things, and that is the existence of an evil power that pervades history and the human experience. between these two influences or forces, we also have free will.

So what are we being rescued from? we are being rescued from our separation from a holy, righteous, loving, and creative god. sin exhibited in all its various forms, has resulted in our blindness to and alienation from god, and this natural condition or state of sin is inherited.
we are all born with this condition. it is our natural inclination toward self-centered love expressed in self-enhancing, self-serving, self-interested, and self-sufficient terms. it affects our thoughts, choices, and actions toward ourselves and others. thus, we find that we totally miss god’s intention for us.

The original intention was for us to have god at the center of our lives. the original intention was for us to be other-directed, loving people who reflect his image.

And that is the rub. with our natural inclinations, we can’t. within our natural selves, we just can’t help missing the mark of god being at the center of our being. we fail to live out other-directed love .

Mark 12- 30-31

somehow we know it. something inside of us recognizes the disharmony, disease, and dissatisfaction with our natural condition of self-centered love. Try as we might by works of will or adherence to laws, we can’t seem to undo this natural state of sin and all the brokenness it exhibits. but even though it is our nature to think and act this way, thanks be to god in Jesus Christ that we don’t have to stay this way. there is a way out! there is a rescue plan!

Jesus accomplished all that was necessary and provided the means and opportunity for us to be healed from the guilt and consequences of sin. By His acceptance of us and our acceptance of His love, we become spiritually alive, and healing from sin condition begins. Christians call the acceptance of His acceptance justification.

We are justified, or perhaps a better way of saying it is that we are put right or set in the right relationship with God, not by any of our doing but totally by His doing. It is also likened to a new birth or being born again.

By putting our faith in a gracious God from the evidence of His working in history and His king in the lives of others as well as allowing Him to work within us and through us, we experience personally this transforming relationship in our work with God.

God loves us in spite of anything we think about ourselves, anything have done, or any way we have failed to love. our recognition that we are put back into the right relationship with him by his doing and not because of anything we do to merit this favor is the good news of the gospel.

There is nothing we can do to earn our salvation or rescue. it is a gift. all we can do is accept it and express our appreciation for it. this appreciation is expressed by opening our lives to the indwelling and working of the holy spirit, who can heal and transform our lives from those of self-love to ones of Christ-centered, other-directed love.

This process of transformation is called sanctification. it is the process of healing from the effects of sin in all its forms. the spiritual birth (justification, which means “set in or put in a right relationship”) leads to a growing up and maturing (sanctification) by means of a new operative that works from within.

It is the process of eliminating the power of sin and our seeming slavery to it. nonetheless, our inclination and condition of sin will remain, however operative or seemingly inoperative, while we grow in our relationship with Jesus Christ.

Now there is further good news in that there is also a future promise, as evidenced by the resurrection of Jesus from the grave. like him, we, too, will someday have minds and bodies free from the inclination, nature, and presence of sin. This is called glorification or our promised glorified state of being at the end of this age of existence.

All three aspects of the rescue justification, sanctification, and glorification are initiated and accomplished by god, who continually comes to man to accomplish his “good and perfect will”(Rom. 12: 2) in each person. This is demonstrated by our receiving his love and giving love back to our creator and redeemer as well as our transferring that kind of love to our neighbor.

This salvation or rescue is also described in two other ways. The first way is within the concept the apostle Paul talks a lot about, which is “you in Christ” that is, our salvation or rescue because of Jesus Christ  This “you in Christ” is another way of saying that we are set into the right relationship with God because of the doing and dying of Jesus christ. It is a salvation imputed to us and given to us freely. it is his doing not ours but his!

2 Corinthians 5- 17-19

The second is described in the concept of“Christ in you”  that is, experiencing Christ in the form of the holy spirit in our inner life. this is the realization of our being born again, where god’s spirit dwells and enlivens us spiritually. it is the concept of man who was heretofore spiritually dead now has his body (physical being), soul (mind, emotions, and will), and spirit enlivened by the holy spirit. This is salvation imparted to us, making known, disclosing, bestowing, and revealing to us what God intends for our new life, our redeemed life to be. again, it is his doing—not ours but his!

Galatians 2-20

The “you in Christ” also features the element of corporate, a commonality, or collective oneness of all humanity. when god created humanity, he created Adam spiritually alive.

However, because of Adam’s choices, he died spiritually. all of us are descendants of Adam, and since we came after his fall and spiritual death, we are all born spiritually dead. Adam’s fall and its consequences have been transferred through the generations to you, me, and all humanity.

when the creator god, Jesus Christ, who created Adam and thus collectively all humanity, came to this earth, he came as a man born of a woman, though He was god.

As a man, he was like Adam in his fallen state with the same inclination, yet no sin was found in him Jesus assumed the same nature as that of the human race he came to save, redeem, and rescue.

He became the “second Adam,” doing that which the first Adam did not do. the first Adam violated the trust relationship with god; the second Adam, Jesus Christ, did not.

To say it another way, god, meaning Jesus Christ, was the creator of Adam and thus collectively the creator of all humanity. In real history god became united with human flesh in Jesus Christ; He became the redeemer and rescuer of Adam and all humanity from the sin problem.

We were all lost “in Adam.” but now in and through Jesus Christ, we are rescued. Jesus did for you, me, and all humanity what we could not do for ourselves. what we are as heirs of Aam can now be changed. we can now be heirs in Christ, but only if we choose it by faith in the rescuer, Jesus Christ.

you can also think of it in another way. we have two heritages to choose from. our first heritage is by right; we are heirs of the first Adam. but we can have a new heritage by faith; we can be heirs of the second Adam, Jesus Christ.

The fulfillment of our substitute inheritance rather than our rightful inheritance is made available by and through the birth, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ (see Romans 5). Not only is it available, but it is a life-giving, free gift that cannot be considered earned by anything we do.

Similarly, the free gift of physical life was given to Adam and to us as well. we never earned life; it is a gift. This gift, however, came with a naturally inherited problem, but Jesus Christ provided the means for a resolution to this problem.

It is available to us, however, only if we choose it. it is not forced upon us. our body and soul, through the acceptance of the gift, can become body, soul, and spirit. we can become spiritually alive. By our willing faith and acceptance of Jesus Christ, we experience a new birth and gain a new family line, a new inheritance, and a new nature. This is not earned by our performance.

we have no rights to it as sinners; it is all a free gift from a gracious and loving god in the triune form of father, son, and Holy Spirit (Rom.6:23). God desperately wants to have a continuing love relationship with each of his creatures now and forever. this is now possible because of Jesus Christ’s life and death on the cross two thousand years ago.

1 Peter 1 3-5

Ultimately there is no life apart from god. the creator of life is also the sustainer of life. there is no life if god does not sustain it. and if God, because of a person’s choice, has to let that individual go, and give him up, the consequence is death.

We can describe this as a second death, an ultimate death, and it was this second death that Jesus experienced on the cross on our behalf. It was God letting the humanity within Jesus go, giving him up to the ultimate consequence of sin.

It was Jesus dying willingly, going through the second death for us that makes his death different from our normal first physical death. All humanity died in Jesus.

When Jesus said on the cross, “My god, my god, why have you forsaken me?” (Matt. 27:46). He was experiencing that ultimate, human second death separation. at that moment no external physical or emotional support was evident to him as he willingly, even unto death on the cross, set his divinity aside. the Holy Spirit and the Father were not available.

Jesus went through the crucifixion experience and to his death totally alone. what made this so painful was the fact that the only thing Jesus had was his history of relationship with the Father.

To be denied it must have been unbelievably excruciating. remember, there was no sin found in this god-man. the best Jesus could do in pure faith was to say, “Father, into your hands I commit my spirit” (Luke 23:46). Jesus’ humanity, mankind’s humanity was sacrificed on the cross.

As the creator of man, Jesus was the only one in the universe who could assume responsibility for humanity. in order to save or rescue man, He willingly suffered the consequence of man’s sin problem.

Through his creative act as a god, he says in effect, “come, I have paid the price, and I have suffered the consequence. you are now free to choose. come, be in a relationship with me, live with me now and forever.”

This is why Jesus is called the savior, because through him alone came life in the beginning as well as the offer of a more abundant life now. he stated in John 10:10,

“I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.” the offer extends to the future, as stated in 1 Corinthians 2:9, “No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what god has prepared for those who love him.”

Suffice it to say, Jesus’ death two thousand years ago has everything to do with you and me today. At His death on the cross two thousand years ago, Jesus accomplished the redemption or rescue plan for mankind.

To make it effective in your life, all you need to do is accept Jesus for who He is and what He has done and then invite Him into your life to work His perfect will both in and through you.

His death and resurrection are the most significant events in all of human history, except for the creation of physical and spiritual human beings in the beginning.

Your friend,
Matt

 

Jesus We Talk About Who Are You?

Jesus We Talk About Who Are You?

Dear Thomas,

In your second question, you state, “It doesn’t make any sense to me that Jesus’ dying on the cross could pay for my sins. no judicial system allows a man to pay for the capital crimes committed by another.

So what makes it right for Christians to assume that Jesus paid the price for mankind’s deliberate wrongdoings? is this some mental gymnastics to allow them to feel free from guilt?

How does Jesus’ dying on the cross in ancient times affect the choices a modern person made in the past, makes currently, or will make in the future?”

I suppose another way you could ask the question is this: How can a perfect, holy, and just god excuse believing sinners and at the same time maintain his integrity to the divine law that justly condemns us? Scripture does say that death is the ultimate consequence of our sins.

Romans 3- 23

you are quite right in your assessment about the ethics of someone saying, “I’ll go to the electric chair for my friend. Let him go free, even though he did commit the murder.” as you said, no judicial system would allow that. each of us must suffer the consequences of our own actions. The social order of societies demands this kind of justice.

Wrongs must ultimately have just or deserved consequences. wrongs must be avenged. however, avenge is not revenge. revenge implies vindictive punishment, retaliation, and malice. avenge, on the other hand, means the infliction of a deserved or just consequence for wrongs, absent of malice.

Too often avenge and revenge have been mixed up when it comes to god’s reaction to sin, lawlessness, and the rebellion of man. unfortunately, much rhetoric has been spoken about god’s anger and wrath toward the sinner and what this angry god wishes and plans to do to those who violate his precepts.

In this view, revenge is the operative concept. it comes from a law-based view of the relationship between God and humankind. you violate God’s law; it makes God angry, and you must be punished. if Jesus were to take our place, take the consequence for our sins, and our law-breaking, then Jesus had to be punished, executed, and suffer the disapproval of an angry God.

No! That is not what’s going on here at all. the issue is that sinful man cannot live in the presence of a holy, just, and all-powerful God  It is true that all humanity stands legally condemned because every one of us has sinned all the way back to Adam.

All humanity has committed unloving and immoral thoughts and acts as a result of the broken relationship between God and humanity. when man sinned, he lost the right to eternal life. sin was man’s attempt to be something he was not created to be.

It was man’s decision to step outside his status as a created being living in an appropriate relationship with his creator. It was the choice Adam and Eve made to cast aside trust in their creator after they listened to false accusations as told to them by the deceiver.

Those accusations were that their creator did not have their best interests in mind and was holding them back from a potential they perceived as good and possible for themselves.

Let me add here that I believe in the existence of the devil, also known as satan and formerly called Lucifer in heaven. prior to his fall, lucifer was the highest-ranking created being in heaven and possibly bore a likeness to Jesus. yet Jesus was god, and Lucifer was not. apparently Lucifer was not satisfied with his creaturely status and rebelled against god, as explained in.

Isaiah 14-12

I will sit enthroned on the mount of assembly, on the utmost heights of the sacred mountain. I will ascend above the tops of the clouds; I will make myself like the most high.”

Lucifer’s rebellion led him to become the full personification of evil. He is cunning and powerful and seeks to destroy God’s relationship with His creation and His creatures. H wants to be like God and wages a battle for the allegiance, worship, and souls (mind, emotions, and will) of human beings.

Thus, full of hatred for god and his creation, satan, when he accomplishes it, seeks to destroy or at least damage every human life. it was this satanic being who caused the fall of the human race through Adam.

Adam, however, did possess free will, and he had to choose what to do with satan’s accusations against God. Adam chose to listen to the evil one, as did Eve. That deliberate and willful breaking of our relationship with god brought forth its consequence, which was our natural death and the ultimate second death.

Life comes from god, the creator and giver of life. separated from god, we have no permanent life. we were meant to be in a relationship with the life-giving god. without him, we starve to death, so to speak.

A reasonable case can be made that through self-help and effort, humans can live pretty good lives, as some reflect on it. but all of us will have to admit that we have made mistakes and have consciously and willfully committed violations in relationships.

All of us have directly rebelled, broken relationships, and acted unlovingly out of self-centered interests. if we are guilty, then we are stuck with the consequences.

The fact is that we are all guilty, and we are all stuck with the consequences. the fact is that we are all guilty, and we are all stuck with the consequences.

You and I may not like the consequences, but the good news is God doesn’t like the consequences either. you and I can’t do anything about it. we are guilty. we can’t undo the crime.

we can’t unring the bell once it has been rung. but god can do something about it, and he has! That is what salvation or rescue is all about.

God wants to heal us from our natural and chosen condition. he wants us to have a new beginning, a new birth, adopted into a new family, a new life with a new inheritance.

And it is all available through the living and dying of Jesus Christ, God incarnate. It is god becoming human, being a living example of life in relation to god, yet suffering the ultimate consequence of our sins for us.

Jesus’ death on the cross was the real and ultimate consequence of God’s dealing with human sin. It was God letting his son go, giving him up, and withdrawing His spirit, as a result of Jesus taking upon himself the human sin problem of the world. As excruciating as the death on the cross was for Jesus, It was equally excruciating for god the father and the holy spirit.

Let me put it this way. it is much like a father who is hanging onto his son’s hand as the son holds onto the leash of their beloved family dog. The dog decides to chase a squirrel, and the squirrel leads both the dog and son over a cliff.

The father desperately hangs onto his son with his one hand. both hither and son are horrified to think of what will happen if the father cannot maintain his grip.

Finally, because of the weight of the dog and son coupled with the forces of gravity, the father loses his grip, and the ultimate consequence is realized. It is equally horrifying to both the son, who plunges to his death for the love of the family dog, and to the father, who suffers the anguish of separation from his son. no, man is not in the hands of an angry god.

The good news is that neither god nor Jesus is mad at us! god is like the father in the prodigal son story of Luke 15:11-32. As Jesus said,

John 10- 30

Accepting God’s offer of salvation is not just a way out of consequential guilt for our sin but a fantastic way of eliminating our guilt at a tremendous cost the death of his son on the cross! it required the perfect life and then the death of Jesus Christ to accomplish for us the elimination of our guilt.

Let’s get back to the question. what makes it right for the Christian to assume that Jesus paid the price or consequence of mankind’s deliberate wrongdoings? was Jesus’ death on the cross punishment, or was it something else?

The issue of Jesus paying the price for my failings or yours, suffering the consequences of sin for all of us, is based on the understanding of the collective, common, and shared oneness of all humankind.

Jesus Christ is god incarnate, the creator of all humanity beginning with the spiritually alive Adam—Jesus could legally represent all humanity.

Jesus Christ, the one who obeyed the law completely by doing the will of his father, willingly laid down his life on behalf of his creation. As the creator of man becoming human, he bore the consequences of that creation gone wrong.

Jesus singularly and alone made the ultimate sacrifice, making possible our salvation, our redemption, our being set right with god. on the cross he willingly gave up life forever, dying the second death for us.

This is the death sentence that Adam received and that we received. humanity died in Jesus because of our sinful choices. Jesus took our sins upon himself. keep in mind that this wasn’t just a “Friday night, Saturday, and Sunday morning” goodbye to life. Jesus was willing to give up life forever, but because he had a faith relationship with the Father, he believed he would rise on the third day.

Expressing his total trust in the Father, Jesus said just seconds before he died, “Father, into your hands I commit my spirit” (Luke 23:46). Jesus’ resurrection was based on pure faith and trust in his Father.

Genesis 2-17

All humanity that was lost in Adam died with Jesus Christ. Jesus suffered and died for all humanity in his death on the cross. As the bible says in

Romans 5-18

For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man, the many will be made righteous.

Because of Jesus’ coming to earth as a man, doing the will of his heavenly father, taking on the sins of the world, paying the price for our sins by dying on the cross yes, because of who Jesus is, namely our creator, redeemer, and god incarnate God in Jesus christ can and has legally and ethically exonerated sinners.

All humanity died collectively with and in Christ. all humanity obeyed the law collectively in Jesus christ. Jesus is the representative of all humanity, whom the apostle Paul calls the second Adam.

This is indeed good news. Jesus did for us and all humanity that which we could not do for ourselves. but this new life becomes applicable and operative to the sinner—you and me—only if we accept Jesus christ as lord, savior, and redeemer. the good news is that even our acceptance is the work of god’s spirit wooing us to it, as the familiar verses of.

John 3-16-17

It is by choice that we are saved from the consequences of sin. God first chose us, and now all we have to do is choose to respond to Him. A person would be correct to question the ethics of Jesus Christ taking on and paying for the sins of the world if He had been just another human being.

But as our creator and as a god, He joined His life with fallen human life, becoming a man. thus, he and he alone—justifiably, legally, and ethically—became our savior. that is the good news! he loves us; god loves us.

And he refused to let us go. As scripture says in Romans “who will rescue me from this body of death? thanks be to God through Jesus christ our lord!”

The sin problem was fixed at the cross. the apostle Paul said in Romans 8:1, “Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.” the in here means believing that Jesus was who he said he was.

It implies a relational faith in his personhood as creator, savior, and the ever-present lord of our life. Paul went on to say in Romans 8:35, “Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?” the answer is an unequivocal “No one.”

Jesus Christ, as our redeemer, experienced that ultimate separation from the Father, that second death once and for all at the cross of Calvary outside the walls of Jerusalem. god promises, “never again!”

Once we choose a relationship with Christ as our creator, redeemer, and lord, we gain a new life, a new beginning, a new birth, a new inheritance, a new history, and a new family tree. Jesus becomes the original and new head of the family as we are

Adopted, grafted into this new family, and given a new identity. we are credited with Christ’s nature. we are no longer “in Adam” but made anew “in Christ.”

we become spiritually alive, whereas before we were spiritually dead. all this happens because god is love and first loved us.

In Christ, our past is forgiven, canceled, and made of no account in our present and future lives. In Him, our present life is changed as well. the old self of sin, death, and self-centeredness no longer has to dominate our lives.

We can begin living with a new and different operative as well as new understandings, intentions, and motives from his indwelling spirit, which heals the past and redirects the old way to a new way of other-centered love.

In Christ, our future is also made different, as we, through Christ’s spirit, continue to heal from the damages of sin in our past and the brokenness we may feel in the present.

To know that we can stand before a holy, righteous, and loving god without fear because we are hidden, adopted, and grafted into Jesus Christ is freedom indeed.

Being in a carrier changes the focus from our performance for acceptance to performance as appreciation for being accepted. think about it.

Being in Christ allows us the opportunity to become all that god desires us to be now and in the future, all as a free gift!

Now comes the apparent rub. there seems to be a big performance gap. we don’t seem to be very successful at living or loving as god originally intended.

We can understand the apostle Paul’s struggle as expressed in Romans in which he lamented his inability to do the things that he wanted to do in a consistent manner. Like Paul, we neither live nor love as God intended.

So what is god-like, as it relates to this performance gap? the good news is that he is like a loving father who is more concerned that we mature in love than about our failures to love.

He continually gives us new beginnings, as many times as we need. and as our loving father, he is the source of our new identity and the source of support, help, and solace in this broken world. he is the source of this new growing up all over again.

God is gracious—I mean, truly gracious! that is another way of describing the good news about God. but in order for the grace of God to be effective in our lives, we must understand that this is His nature.

No matter what we may have done in the past, what we just did in the present, or what we might do in the future, god is still gracious, and we can fully trust him.

Out of this trust comes a change within our hearts and minds. that change causes a transformation. this transformation is his doing, not ours.

He is the redeemer; we do not redeem ourselves. our part, as stated before, is our continued willing acceptance of his acceptance and staying in relationship with Him.

This is not cheap grace that i am talking about here but a life that recognizes God’s love, a life that recognizes an inability to love back adequately. It is a life that recognizes that God through Jesus Christ has taken care of our failures—past, present, and future.

As Jesus said in Matthew 11:28-30 “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. for my yoke is easy and my burden is light.”

With the above as my understanding of who we are, complete and perfect in Christ yet incomplete as far as obtaining any sense of that perfection, I can confidently say we have a justified faith that declares it so.

What can we say to a God who is so gracious yet painfully aware of our natural inheritance in Adam? what would our prayer look like if we were to open our soul (our mind, emotions, and will) and our very heart to this god?

Each of our prayers would be different, but they would all be a sinner’s prayer. a sinner’s prayer can be as simple and sincere as, “Jesus, forgive me. I want you in my life,” or it can be a full outpouring of a person’s realization of one’s sinful condition and the assurance gained in understanding what happens when one is accepting Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.

Here is one of my prayers that I find applicable every time I read it. it is as follows:

Dear Lord Jesus,

you know my heart, mind, and body. you know my history, the sum total of all my experiences that make up my view of you, my view of myself, and my view of the world about me.

you know all the unloving acts I have committed, whether in mind or body. you know all the good I have done or tried to do. you know all the evil that was done by my willing hand or mind.

you know my needs and my longings. you know my spiritual understandings and my misunderstandings. you know everything there is to know about me.

Lord, you know that I am caught in the effects of a world that chose to separate from you long ago. it is like an inherited disease passed on to me by those who came before. I am caught in its effect.

I live with the realization that my existence is deficient in the one aspect above all else that represents you. I am deficient in love.

you know that when I speak of love, I don’t really know what I am talking about. The love that I know is continually bombarded by self-love, an egocentric love.

I know that I am undone, incomplete, and fallen from your intent. I confess that I am in need of a savior. if I think that I can lift myself into your acceptance and grace

Through my lofty ideas, my efforts in doing good deeds, or by shunning evil thoughts and deeds, I all too quickly find my attempts futile and delusional.

As You know, it has always been my understanding that I do not possess my existence, my life by right. It is a gift from You, my Creator that allows me to live, move, and have being.

I confess that I have not done all that well with that gift. I’m truly sorry. I apologize for all the unloving ways I think and act toward myself, others, and You. Forgive me, Jesus. I wish it were not this way, but to ask You to help me is the best I can do.

What must change in me so that I come to the full realization that You are a God who truly loves and that it is the nature of that love to descend to me and to all others without qualification?

In effect, You say to me and to all sinners willing to recognize and admit their condition, “I forgive you! I accept you!” Through the sacrificial act of Jesus Christ, You have set me right and put me in the right relationship with You.

You have not told me to go and perform in order to prove my acceptability but rather to come and receive my free gift, which is all Your doing and none of mine, except for my acceptance of your acceptance.

Continue to teach me, Jesus, and affirm in me that life is not about how good I have to be. Teach me that there is nothing I can do to gain the salvation that You have already granted to me. Lead me to a life that shows appreciation for that salvation already granted.

Jesus, it seems to me that I can do no more than to present myself to You just as I am. I can do no more than to look at the evidence of Your love and grace and trust myself into Your keeping. By Your declaration, I must affirm that I belong to You even now in this earthly life. I need You and want You as my Savior and Redeemer, for I can neither save nor redeem myself

My prayer is that You would remold my mind from within. In Your way and in Your good time, heal me from the effects and damages of my natural inheritance in this fallen world.

May I always know that if this life should end by accidental or natural causes before Your work in me is complete, I can rest assured by Your promise and through Your resurrection as the firstfruits of what is to come, that You will recreate me, body and mind, with a new nature that is in complete harmony with the principles of love that govern Your universe?

Thank You, Jesus, for Your love that has been and always will be directed toward me and all others, for there is nothing that can separate me from Your love.

Through faith with ample evidence, I understand that it is You, who is the Creator and Redeemer of the world! You came in the garden of Eden in the cool of the evening.

You came in the experience and words of the patriarchs and prophets of old. You came in the sacrificial, self¬ love expressed in Your earthly birth, life, death, and resurrection.
And You continue to come to us in that same majesty of love through the work of the Holy Spirit.

Best of all, You will come to this earth again, break through our sense world, and ultimately take us to a new earthly home that You intended for us from the beginning. Thank You, Lord Jesus, for Your love that is the same yesterday, today, and forever. Thank You!

Through Christ’s divine right, I have been declared Your creation and recreation. Amen.

Your friend,
Matt

 

 

 

Jesus We Talk About Nonissue Or Spin?

Jesus We Talk About Nonissue Or Spin?

Dear Thomas,

Your next question is a good one. You asked, “It seems that Christianity rests on the idea that Jesus rose from the dead. If that is true, why did only His closest followers record the event and preach it? Why didn’t historians and government officials of the time document it as well?”

Ancient scribes and historians did not often record the mistakes of their rulers and kings. I understand that Egyptologists find no battles lost in Egyptian hieroglyphics.

Warriors are lost but not battles. After all, who wants to record their mistakes or defeats, especially if you are a pharaoh god-king? How can a god lose?

However, from the evidence recorded in the Old Testament, Judaism was one of the few civilizations that did record its lost battles and in many cases, the why.

Even in the modern age, we have seen cover-ups by national leaders in order to avoid the condemnation of peers and history. The Soviet Union and China both rewrote their histories during times of political shifting.

American authors reporting on historical events of our country’s past have put their own spin on certain facts. This tendency to interject bias into the reporting of history was certainly true of the Roman leaders and the Jewish priesthood in Jerusalem at the time of Jesus’ death and resurrection.

The Romans had no reason to promote a Jewish messiah-king. In fact, they had many reasons to make sure that reporters of the day put a distinctive Roman spin on what happened that eventful Sunday morning.

Spin is about preserving power and control, and the Roman leadership was not about surrendering power and control to an event that they could easily spin into something unbelievable.

Likewise, the Jewish priesthood had everything to lose if there was no cover-up about the resurrection of Jesus. They were the ones who had Him arrested, saw Him go to trial, and called for His execution. They knew very well that resurrection from the dead would require an action beyond all human power.

If they acknowledged that Jesus had indeed been raised from the dead as He had declared would happen by divine power, then everything else He had said would also be validated. That was not an option for the Jewish priesthood.

So what might be the spin concerning the idea of a resurrected Jesus? If we were to try to eliminate the idea that it really happened, we might have a few options on how to explain the event.

We could say that Jesus did not fully die. There have been people who were thought to be dead but in fact were not and later revived.

It would certainly provide a convenient spin to claim that Jesus was merely resuscitated after a time in the tomb. But the theory of resuscitation and His appearance to numerous disciples don’t seem to fit the record.

Without divine intervention, how could a weak, near-dead Jesus (or His friends) roll away the stone sealing the tomb, I might add, that was carefully guarded? Furthermore, when Jesus appeared to the women that Sunday morning outside the tomb and when He appeared to the two travelers on the road to Emmaus (see Luke 24:13—32), He certainly did not appear weak.

The same can be said when He talked with Peter in Jerusalem or with the eleven disciples in the upper room. That is a lot of activity for someone who was physically tortured to the point that He couldn’t even carry His cross to the crucifixion site.

Mark 16-14

Then on top of that, He was hanged on the cross by nails driven through His wrists and heels. If He could survive all that and be no worse for it, that would truly be some resuscitation!

Did Jesus actually die? Roman crucifixion wasn’t a partial or maybe death it was a certain death. The person being crucified wasn’t removed from his cross until death was assured.

That is why the soldiers broke the legs of the two criminals on either side of Jesus—to hasten their death so that they could get the job done before the Jewish Sabbath began. After their legs were broken, the criminals could no longer push themselves up in an effort to breathe. Thus, death was hastened by suffocation.

When the soldiers approached Jesus, He appeared already dead to them, so they pierced His side with a spear (see John 19:34). Because He had no reflex or blood pressure, only residual blood and body fluid flowed from the wound, further confirming His death, the Roman executioners determined that Jesus was indeed dead.

If it had truly been a matter of resuscitation, Jesus would have remained on the earth for some time until He died from natural or unnatural causes. But it did not happen that way with Jesus. After He rose from the grave, He chose to whom He would appear and when He would take His leave from this planet.

Some question why Jesus didn’t just go with His disciples or a group of witnesses to Pilate, Caiaphas, the full body of the Sanhedrin, or Herod and show them proof positive the resurrected Son of the living God.

Why didn’t He explain to them the meaning of it all, as He did to the two travelers on the road to Emmaus (see Luke 24:13)? Wouldn’t that have settled it once and for all? But that is not what Jesus did.

Once again He chose to whom He would appear, and He chose when He would take his leave. Forty days later He ascended to His Father from the Mount of Olives outside the city of Jerusalem.

Why did He do it that way? I have a suspicion that God always leaves the door open to doubt. He always allows us the power to choose, the power to exercise free will, and the power to decide freely whether we will walk in faith or doubt.

If the evidence is so strong and so overwhelming that the power of choice is taken away, then the process of redemption and liberation changes to the process of coercion and intimidation. That is not the way love acts. The evidence is there, but it is not so overwhelming that a spin can’t be invented.

As history looks back on the events of Jesus’ death and resurrection, are there any other possibilities for discounting the resurrection? Could it have been a conspiracy promoted by His followers, the spin of those who had vested interests in keeping the movement alive?

Could they have wondered if their time spent with their Lord and Savior was for naught and thus created a story to fit their agenda? I think it would be quite difficult to make this kind of spin stick.

All that the opponents had to do was to open the tomb and produce the body. Yet they couldn’t because the tomb was empty. That is the rub for all the detractors of the resurrection—the tomb was empty!

True, people could say that the body had been stolen. But Roman guards weren’t prone to sleeping on the job. Even if they had dozed off, the commotion of someone rolling back the stone would have brought them to attention.

And if the disciples did steal Jesus’ body, it would be most unlikely that they would collectively live out their lives the way they did and die as martyrs on behalf of a lie. You could conjecture that it wasn’t His disciples, who stole the body, but some of His other followers who never told the disciples what they had done.

But then what about the rest of the story—the appearances, the changed lives of the disciples? That spin falls flat when the birth, life, death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus are all taken together in the context of a God who came to redeem the world.

Through the eyewitness accounts of the risen Christ, the good news of the Christian faith soon developed. The record of the events was written when the knowledge of the events was still current, real, and personal.

To those who lived it, the events were like Pearl Harbor, the Kennedy assassination, or 9 or 11. Those who are witnesses to such events don’t ever forget them any more than I could forget my “prayer and fox” story of chapter 2 now some fifty-plus years ago.

Another possible conjecture is that the disciples were hallucinating when it came to seeing Jesus after His death. Could their desire to believe that He was raised from the dead —as He had said would happen—have been so overwhelming that they broke with reality?

Had they wanted it so badly that they—and a whole bunch of them—imagined it to be so? The problem with this theory is that hallucinations apply to individuals, not to groups of people.

A multitude of people claiming to have spoken to, eaten with, and touched the subject of their hallucination doesn’t fit any normal definition of hallucination.

Could it be that the whole resurrection thing is just a myth, a good story that is spiritually or symbolically true but not historically true? Could it be a good folktale told by Jesus’ followers to add credibility and meaning to His ministry?

You might get away with the myth idea if the history of Christianity hadn’t begun so soon. The resurrection was affecting lives; eyewitnesses were still alive, and the idea that the resurrection was only spiritually or symbolically true could not stand against the reality of what had actually happened.

Myths and legends take time to develop, and there was just too much immediacy of the resurrection for it to have been a mythological event.

The spread of early Christianity happened quickly, beginning on the day of Pentecost with the conversion of three thousand people from many cultures and languages (see Acts 2).

Some might ask why the writers of history waited so long to record the events of Jesus’ life. To answer that, we need to take a look at Jesus’ ascension into heaven, which was recorded in.

Act 1- 10-11

The witnesses to the ascension expected Jesus to return very soon and probably did not think it necessary to make a permanent record of the events of His life. In fact, early Christians under stress and persecution would often say to each other with hope and desire, “Maranatha,” which means, “Come, Lord.”

In the first century, this great and continued anticipation of Jesus’ return removed some of the urgency of recording the events of His life, death, and resurrection. Thus, many years passed before the record of Jesus’ doings and sayings was written down.

Yes, the resurrection did happen in real time and in real history. There was indeed an empty tomb, and Jesus’ enemies and detractors could not produce a corpse. All that the detracting powers could do was to push forward the idea of a cover-up, as reported in

Matthew 28- 11

When the chief priests had met with the elders and devised a plan, they gave the soldiers a large sum of money, telling them, “You are to say, ‘His disciples came during the night and stole him away while we were asleep.’

If this report gets to the governor, we will satisfy him and keep you out of trouble.” So the soldiers took the money and did as they were instructed. And this story has been widely circulated among the Jews to this very day.

I suspect that if the facts of the resurrection could be played out in a court of law in the first century, the verdict would surely come in, “Jesus is alive! After His death on the cross, Jesus was raised in three days!” Of course, I am assuming the presence of a fair and impartial jury.

I would expect all the evidence to be presented, including all the eyewitness accounts. The trial would consist of both factual and circumstantial evidence, both positive and negative with many expert witnesses brought in to testify at such a trial. And it would use all the current critical analysis in the defense of the arguments surrounding the event.

But the truth is that this trial has been going on ever since the actual event took place. The trial goes on within the life of each person who listens to the record of the events. If the resurrection is true (which it is), it wields an enormous impact on your life and all of human life.

The birth, life, death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus Christ as well as what it means to the redemptive process of each of us is a thing of wonder now and will be throughout the eternal ages. We may never, I dare say, comprehend the extent of God’s love. At best, all we can do is enjoy the realization that

John 3- 16-17

To disbelieve in the resurrection of Jesus Christ, we must deliberately make an exception to the way we make judgments of all the other events in history. Why would anyone want to do that? This goes back to the thoughts expressed in Chapter 3 about why Jesus’ death was so significant in world history.

Again, it might be conceivable to accuse one or two people of hallucinating about an event, but the idea loses its credibility when we extend the conjecture to hundreds of people who have the same hallucination and even give their lives for it.

As I have stated before, myths and legends don’t happen instantly. They are developed over long periods of time. The very nature of the gospels, however, each with its own unique variations, is a strong case against the idea that the disciples conspired to create a myth.

They were clearly written at different times by different authors to different audiences for different purposes. Even if that myth were assigned spiritual or symbolic meaning, it would still be a weak case.

In addition, I don’t think that people collectively die as martyrs for a known lie. We do see some people—however misguided, misunderstood, or misdirected —committed to false beliefs and even dying for them, regardless of whether history determines the beliefs to be true or not.

Suicide bombers are a case in point. People do believe in lies, but they do not usually die for lies that they have willingly and knowingly created.

Self-delusion certainly occurs in many instances, but is it reasonable to conclude that a coordinated, massive self-delusion took place among the diverse group of people who followed Jesus? I don’t think so!

But the question can still be asked why so few disinterested secular historians recorded so little about such an astounding event. Here I think that we would have to go back to the historical record, as best as it can be reconstructed, and look at the political, economic, social, and religious times in which Jesus lived.

There was much going on at the time. The Romans ruled Palestine with an iron hand and tolerated no dissent or rebellion against Roman occupation and rule. Rome was ruled by military power, which was exercised in such a way as to induce fear in the common Jewish populace.

Additionally, coalitions existed between the Romans and local governors as well as with the Jewish priestly class. The Jewish priestly class developed varied relationships with the powerful elite that benefited themselves but did little to lift the burden of Roman rule from the common Jewish communities.

From Rome’s perspective, Judaism was tolerated as long as it did not upset the peace or interfere with revenue collected from the area.

When communities were under extreme stress because of taxation, repression, tyranny, or a lack of control over their destinies, they were ripe to follow anyone who promised something better or a way out of Roman domination.

In the Jewish tradition, it was common to find those who declared themselves prophets of the Lord. Numerous messiah figures made their claims, and groups of bandits, rebels, and other malcontents attracted followers in that oppressed society.

Many of these prophets leaders or charismatic individuals were politically motivated to remove Roman occupation and rule. Some did this by direct rebellion, like that of the mid-first-century Zealots, whose actions ultimately led to the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70.

Other leaders who were more concerned with social or religious purity withdrew their followers from the established towns and villages dominated by Roman control.

One such group established the village of Qumran, where the Dead Sea Scrolls were found centuries later. Still, other leaders developed followings just to strike back at all the injustices, both real and perceived, suffered under Roman rule.

Remember, embedded in the hearts and minds of the Jewish people was their entire history. They remembered the promise made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. They remembered their oppression in Egypt and how God delivered them from that bondage through Moses.

They remembered what God did to the Egyptians at the Red Sea. They remembered how God had led them through the wilderness to the Promised Land and how God, through Joshua, had enabled them to conquer it.

They remembered their failures through the judges. They remembered the glory of the Davidic kingship, the factions that split the kingdom, the prophets and their warnings, and their captivity in Babylon and subsequent release.

They remembered returning to the Promised Land and rebuilding the temple. They remembered and recognized that the God of Israel was present and active through all the events of their history. They were firm in their historical and eschatological destiny.

The time was right for all kinds of movements, and there were many. The Romans knew this and kept a close eye on them. When things seemed to be getting out of hand, the Romans would squash the movement by killing the leader and sometimes the followers as well.

This was the time when the Roman emperors Augustus and Tiberius ruled, and Pontius Pilate was appointed governor of Jerusalem. This was also the time in history when numerous high priests held office, Joseph Caiaphas being in that office at the time of Jesus’ trial.

This was the time of John the Baptist and his demise at the hand of Herod. This was the nature of the times in which Jesus of Nazareth lived.

Two other men were crucified with Jesus, and most likely others were crucified in the days preceding and following Jesus’ crucifixion. We do not know the number of those who suffered this fate, but we do know that crucifixion was not a particularly unique event from a Roman anti perhaps even Jewish perspective.

Jesus’ crucifixion, therefore, might have garnered no extra attention. He was just someone whose growing spiritual and charismatic power over the people concerned the Jewish priesthood. They feared what Jesus’ influence might do to their own power structure, and His indictment of their system of performance-based religious understanding certainly didn’t help His cause.

His triumphal entry into Jerusalem just before Passover and His bold act of driving out the moneychangers in the temple merely added to the view that Jesus was just one more rebel within the Jewish populace.

His crucifixion was really nothing to take note of, except by a band of followers and those of the Jewish establishment that He seemed to threaten.

How wrong they were! The crucifixion of Jesus Christ was a pivotal point in the redemptive history of mankind. It was the full exposure of the consequence of evil. It was the expressed nature of a loving God that even the onlooking beings of the universe witnessed.

When Jesus said on the cross, “It is finished” (John 19:30), little did the Romans or the Jewish priesthood know what He meant. It doesn’t surprise me that there is so little secular recording of the event.

It was just the nature of the times. “It is finished,” meant the rescue plan had been accomplished. Jesus completed His earthly mission. The way of salvation is now open to all!

We can have complete assurance that resuscitation, hallucination, myth, and legend do not apply. The resurrection of Jesus is a historical fact. The tomb He was buried in, the tomb that was sealed and guarded is empty!

Please take the time to read John 14:1-12 and John 18-20:29. Then go to the book of Matthew and read about the cover-up in Matthew 28:11-13. Yes, the resurrection of Jesus Christ on that Sunday morning centuries ago did indeed happen in real-time and in real history.

You can bank your life on it! It is certainly not a nonissue, and it is certainly not just spin. In fact, it is the only thing you can bank your life on. Without the resurrection of Jesus Christ, we are all left in our sins and doomed to their consequences.

The fact is that Jesus did die for us. The fact is that He was raised from the dead by the Father. Now a whole new operative is at work in the lives of those who believe. And that belief is due not just to a mythical story of Jesus’ death and resurrection for the purpose of a religious construct but to die story of real history in real time at a real place.

It all adds to the whole body of evidence in Scripture passed down through the ages before and after the event. It is true the tomb is empty, and Jesus is alive! Your Creator and Redeemer lives! And He wants a real and personal relationship with you, not just in this life here and now but in the life to come in eternity.

Jesus Christ conquered sin, overcame death, and offered the free gift of acceptance, love, and eternal life to everyone who chooses it. All we have to do is, through faith, accept the free gift offered by the giver, Jesus Christ, and allow His love and life to flow in and through us.

Your friend,
Matt

 

 

Jesus We Talk About No Coming

Jesus We Talk About No Coming

Dear Thomas,

In your fourth question, you stated, “I understand that Jesus said He was going to come back from heaven ‘soon.’ For nearly two thousand years now people have been saying that, but there has been no second coming.

Is this just a scare tactic to keep religionists in line?” You also said, “It seems to me it is similar to what kids are told about how they need to be good because Santa Claus is coming.”Certainly, Christians have been disappointed at what seems like a great delay. The disciples, the apostle Paul, and the early Christians expected Jesus to return during their lifetimes.

They lived in eager anticipation and expectation of that return. Why have Christians down through the ages always anticipated Jesus’ soon return? Jesus’ own promise created the expectation.

John 14 : 1-3

The angels at Jesus’ ascension also told the disciples that Jesus would come back just as they had seen Him go (see Acts 1:9-11).

To the very end of the first century and beyond, the hope in Jesus’ return remained strong. The apostle John, the writer of Revelation, said in Revelation 1:7, “Look, He is coming with the clouds; and every eye shall see him.” In Revelation 22:7, John also quoted Jesus as saying, “Behold, I am coming soon!”

It stands to reason that if this present existence is all there is and there is to be no second coming of Jesus, then the whole notion of salvation, rescue, and redemption is pointless. And it goes back to your remarks in your first question (chapter 3) that if Jesus was just another man in history, then everything else about Him is meaningless.

That is why the bishops of Rome wrote the Apostles’ Creed in the late second century. Later when controversy arose over the deity of Jesus, the bishops gathered in Nicene under Constantine and wrote the Nicene Creed in AD 325.

Both affirm the second coming of Christ. You can easily find and read both creeds on the Web.“Why,” someone might ask, “would Jesus come back? Wouldn’t it be just as feasible for Him to remain in heaven seated at the right hand of the Father?

After successfully redeeming the world to Himself once and for all at the cross, couldn’t He just allow people to die however that death might come—and pass judgment on their lives at that time? With that judgment, couldn’t He bring them to heaven to be with Him forever or send them to hell as their just reward? Why does He need to come back to earth again with power and glory to claim His own? Why should He come back at all?”

The answer involves the nature and character of God and the nature of man. God has consistently and continually come to man from the very beginning of man’s creation on earth. Think of the way man was created as a physical, thinking, spiritually alive being designed to live in the physical environment God created for him on the earth.

This Creator God in Genesis was Jesus Himself, as expressed by the apostle John (John 1:1—5) and the writer of Hebrews (Heb. 1:1—3). Think of Adam and Eve and the way Jesus came to Adam and talked with Him in the cool of the day (Gen. 3:8). Think of Jesus’ words to Adam when He said to him after the fall in the garden, “Who told you that you were naked?” (Gen. 3:11).

Think of all the times thereafter when Jesus visited the patriarchs and prophets with dreams, visions, voices, or angels, continually moving, changing, and evolving history to the point of His first coming.

Jesus came the first time, as determined by the Father, when the time was right (see Gal. 4:4-5). Think of the magnificent revelation of God the Father through Jesus’ life and the words of Jesus when He said, “Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father.

How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? Don’t you believe that I am in the Father and that the Father is in me?” (John 14:9-10). And again Jesus said, “I and the Father are one” (John 10:30).

Jesus’ life was God coming to man to show the way of salvation within a broken world that was trapped in the problems and consequences of rebellion and sin. It was God through Jesus coming to earth in our habitat, in our bodily form, with flesh and blood, taking on our nature. He came to show not only God’s love for us but also His commitment to His creation, His commitment to man in the very form and nature in which He created him.

There is no indication that God has decided that man should become something other than what God intended for him in the first place. There is no indication that God is going to make us into disembodied spirits or change us into another form like a spider, elephant, dolphin, or an imaginary beast with eyes in the front and back, six arms, and a dozen heads.No, God created us as flesh-and-blood human beings.

Genesis 1 : 27

 

He created us as spiritually alive physical beings to live in a physical world. There is no indication that He is going to change His original intention. What God says He is going to do through the doing and dying of Jesus Christ is to transform a broken world into a healed world. He is going to change the world where mortality rules to a world where immortality rules. God promises to create all things new, without the effect of sin or its scars.

That means that not only are we going to be changed, but this world we live in is also going to be changed from its broken, corruptible nature to the perfect functionality that God first created and intended for it.

Mankind, now being born with a corruptible nature, is going to be transformed to having an incorruptible nature. Our mortal bodies will become immortal. Our sinful natures will be healed from their sinfulness. The apostle Paul says in 1 Corinthians 15:23, 51-53

But each in his own turn: Christ the first fruits [the first to experience this change]; then, when he comes [the second coming which we look forward to], those who belong to him. We will not all sleep, but we will all be changed in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet, for the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. For the perishable must clothe itself with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality.

With much the same thought, the apostle John says in Revelation 21:1, “Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away.”

But first Jesus needs to come back to this earth. When He left to return to the Father, the disciples were probably quite anxious. They were probably asking themselves, What is going to happen next? How soon he come back? Think of what they had just been through those last forty-five days.

From Jesus’ triumphant entry into Jerusalem to the Last Supper in the upper room to the trial and crucifixion and then to His resurrection and appearance to many prior to His ascension, the highs and lows they experienced were great. And now He was gone! Can you imagine their open-mouthed wonderment at what it all meant?

Before He ascended, Jesus gave His disciples instructions, and they followed them (see Acts 1:4-5). Returning to Jerusalem, what were they to do but to think back on all the things Jesus had told them? For example, He had said, “‘It is not for you to know the times or dates the Father has set by his own authority.

But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth” (Acts 1:7-8). With these words, Jesus promised not to abandon them but to come to them again, this time in the third person of the Godhead, the Holy Spirit.

And that same Spirit continues to be with us until the day when God declares the time is right for Jesus to come again. This second coming of Jesus will be very real to our senses just as the ascension was real to the disciples’ senses. But the when of His coming has always been and will remain an unanswerable question.

Throughout the history of the Christian church, many have tried to figure out the when. If they could just get all the prophecies as expressed in Isaiah, Daniel, and Revelation right, maybe they could figure out the date of His return, they surmise.

And there have been many who thought they had done just that, much to their disappointment. The time is apparently not yet right. I have often wondered why these people try to attach a date to Jesus’ return, for Jesus said in Matthew 24:36, “No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.”

If you were to ask why God waited four hundred years to deliver Israel from Egyptian bondage, I certainly would not have the answer. Was He waiting for Moses or a particular pharaoh to arrive on the scene?

If you were to ask why God waited so many years after the Diaspora of the Israelites (scattering of the Jews) and allowed so many years of brutal Roman domination and oppression before He came in person to reveal His love and interest in the salvation of man, I could not answer that either.

Was God waiting for the unique combination of Herod, Caiaphas, Pilate, Mary with a cousin named John, and Saul who would become the apostle Paul to appear? Did He wait until the time in history when the cross became the norm of Roman execution? I don’t know.

What combination of events, people, and circumstances need to be in place for Jesus to come a second time? Again I have to say that I don’t know. The Bible does say that conditions will be similar to those in the days of Noah, “The Lord saw how great man’s wickedness on the earth had become, and that every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil all the time” (Gen. 6:5). Then, in Genesis 6:11, the Bible says, “Now the earth was corrupt in God’s sight and was full of violence.”

What must be revealed to mankind about the nature and character of sin, rebellion, and lawlessness in a universal sense for the time to be right for Jesus’ return? What has to be revealed about God’s nature and character for the time to be right? Is it about the development of religious belief systems and what they say about God and their effects on human character? Or is it about each person and the decisions he or she makes within free will irrespective of his historicity of whether to love or hate?

Might it also be about the world that comes to the place where it can blow itself up and decide to do just that? Is it about the world’s ability to annihilate itself through chemical and biological poisons and its decision to do just that? Is it about a unique combination of all these things plus others I have not described or thought of?

Is it about a unique combination of persons, leaders, despots, dictators, presidents, religious leaders, clerics, and holy men who contribute to the full picture of what God wants to be revealed to His created beings prior to His coming?

And finally, do we have to experience the full nature of evil and the consequences of sin and rebelliousness before the time is right for Jesus’ return? If so, it does not sound like a fun time to live in, yet it would be a fantastic time for experiencing the return of Christ!

When will the second coming occur? “No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. Be on guard! Be alert! You do not know when that time will come” (Mark 13:32-33). Just a few verses earlier, Scripture says, “At that time men will see the Son of Man coming in clouds with great power and glory.

And he will send his angels and gather his elect from the four winds from the ends of the earth to the ends of the heavens” (Mark 13:26-27). In a verse between these two, Mark 13:30, Jesus said, “I tell you the truth, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened,” speaking of all that was to take place before His second coming.

The key to understanding this verse is to know who “this generation” is referring to. In hindsight, it seems that “this generation” must refer to the generation living at the time when all the things Jesus said must take place prior to His return have taken place or are in the process of taking place.

But generations come and go, and my generation is probably not your generation. Who then belongs to the generation referred to? I must leave the identity of the generation and the timing for Jesus’ return to God alone.

Even though we must wait for the event that is going to take place in real-time and in real history, we cannot be cavalier about it, for it is going to be an event as big as the creation itself. This event will be final, and the enormity of the finality of things as we know them continues to give me pause and wonderment.

No more will we be forced to endure the brokenness, death, and destruction that have been the nature of things throughout recorded history. Things will change dramatically. But within that change, we will still be flesh and blood human beings ready and able to live forever in a physically perfect world.

Thus, when Jesus says that He is going to come back to claim His own, He means just that. He is coming back physically just as the disciples saw Him go.

Let me insert a note here concerning the structure of my personal belief system and how I express it. I believe that God is the Creator of all that is and is personally involved with His creation (see Gen.1).

I believe that God is love personified and runs His universe on the principles of love (1 John 4:8, 16). I believe that God has always been true to that principle, past, present, and future (see Heb. 13:8). I believe deeply in the centrality of Jesus Christ in the plan of salvation or the rescue of mankind (see 2 Tim. 3:16; John 14:6).

I believe in the authority of scripture and the right of private judgment with its implications for the idea of tolerance and religious liberty to the extent that it does not violate the picture of God as agape (unconditional, self-emptying, benevolent) love personified (see 1 John 4:8).

I believe in salvation by grace made effective by faith and faith alone as both a divine and human act (see Rom. 12:1-2; Eph. 2:8-9). I believe in freedom of will where God predestines all to be saved but not all choose to be (see Deut. 30:19; Josh. 24:13; John 3:16).

I believe in the sanctity of the common life as expressed in matters of health, relationships, and stewardship (see Acts 17:28; 1 Cor. 6:19; Gal. 5:22; 2 Cor. 9:6- 8). And I believe in the priesthood ofall believers (see Rom. 12:4-8; Eph. 4:11-13).

Joshua 24 : 13

I am also committed to the belief in the Hebrew thought of man as body, soul (one’s mind, emotions, and will as detailed in Jer. 17:10, Jer. 31:33; Acts 14:2; Col. 3:2; Rev. 2:23; Mark 14:34; Luke 2:35; Matt. 10:28; 1 Cor. 7:37), and spirit (Acts 15:8) alive with breath as a single whole (Gen. 2:7; 3:19; Ps.l15:17; Job 14:12; 19:25-27; Eccles. 9:5; Luke 24:38-39; Rom. 6:23; 1 Cor.l5:51-54; 2 Tim. 4:1; Rev. 20:14; 21:3-4).

I’ll admit that this is in contrast to the Greek thought of dualism, which dominates our Western culture. In this thought, man, though a physical being, also has a soul that is part of yet separable from the physical body. This soul can live independently of the body and separate from it at death. Thus, I suppose you could say that I am a Hebrew Christian living in a Greek-dominated Christian world.

However, the centrality of Jesus Christ is the same for both Jews and Greeks (Gal. 3:26-29). The differences show up in the picture of the nature and character of God; the nature of man, whether mortal, immortal, or conditionally immortal; the state of the dead; and the final end of sin and sinners. All my answers to your questions will reflect my camera angle on the holistic bodily nature of man versus the dualistic nature of man.

My view is by far a minority view in our Western Christian world. Most Christians believe that immediately upon death the soul (as an entity in and of itself that is the full essence of a person) goes to heaven to be with Jesus or is banished from His presence to a place most uncomfortable.

Few make the paradigm shift from Greek to Hebrew thought on the nature of man. Again, all differences aside, the central focus is Jesus Christ and His open door of salvation leading to our atonement or “at-one-ment” with our God and Creator.

It is as simple as God’s willingness to accept us in our current condition and our willingness to accept that acceptance. This is called grace.

The scientific understanding of our world’s place in the solar system and the nature of the universe creates difficulty for many Christians to believe in a literal second coming of Jesus Christ. They find it difficult to envision Him coming in the clouds accompanied by a heavenly host.

If we only had a DVD recording of His ascension to heaven, faith in the coming event might be a little easier to come by. But because of the eyewitness accounts of His ascension, the idea of Jesus’ momentary return was a driving force of the early church.

I concur with those who express doubt that the Christian movement would ever have advanced if Jesus’ return had originally been understood as some event not scheduled for another two or three thousand years. There were early warnings not to give up on that hope of a soon return.

We read in 2 Peter 3:3-4, for example, “You must understand that in the last days, scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. They will say, ‘Where is this coming he promised? Ever since our fathers died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation.’”

Today, however, the anticipated hope of the soon return of Jesus Christ has taken a backseat to other aspects of the gospel and various thoughts on end-time events, such as the rapture.

For example, if the secret rapture of the church (which will be no secret to those left behind) is the First evidence of His coming, then that would be the hope of the Christian—and to many it is. The concept of the rapture of the church is a concept that has been popularized by some evangelical churches in recent history.

In Matthew 24:40-41 and Luke 17:34-36, you can find an expression of the rapture. Matthew 24:39b-4l says, “That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left.

Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left.” The following question is raised: Taken to what and left for what?

Note that the verse says, “The coming of the Son of Man,” not man going to the Son. It has always been my understanding that the meaning of the one taken and the other left is that both have the opportunity to meet the Lord in the air, as the apostle Paul expressed in 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17.

The people described above are obviously in close relationships with one another—two men in the field, and two women grinding together. Regardless of the closeness of the relationship, however, the destiny of each is different. There is one taken and one left in each case.

The disciples seemed to understand what it meant to be left, but they questioned Jesus about those taken. As recorded in Luke 17:37, they asked Him, “Where, Lord?” and Jesus replied, “Where there is a dead body, there the vultures will gather.”

This hardly sounds like an ascension into eternal bliss with the Lord in heaven! In the vernacular, we often hear people say things like, “He was taken by a wild animal,” or, “The sea took him,” or, “Such and such a disease took him,” or, “He was taken by cancer.”

What I am suggesting is that the one left describes those who are among the saved and that those taken are the lost who are taken to eternal destruction, having denied themselves by their choices the opportunity to respond to God’s wooing through His Spirit.

In Revelation 6:15-17, these people even call for the rocks to fall upon them. Thus, for me, these verses do not lend substantial support to the concept of the rapture of the saved prior to Jesus’ second coming.

Another concept of the rapture that always seemed to me a bit incongruent with the way God has usually come to mankind in either judgment or redemption is the “second chance” idea of the rapture. With the traditional or popular view, those who are left behind understand that they were not among those who were raptured, but the second coming is still to come.

This gives them a second chance to be saved. But what does this imply about those who died because they were in airplanes with pilots who were raptured or those in buses or cars who died because their drivers were raptured? Where is their second chance?

An even bigger question is this: Did God give a second chance to those who were not in Noah’s boat or those who were destroyed at Sodom and Gomorrah? When destruction came, it was a surprise. That is how the second coming is described. It will come at a time not expected. No second chance will be provided.

The Bible says in Luke 17:28-30, concerning the condition at the time of Jesus’ second coming, “It was the same in the days of Lot. People were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building. But the day Lot left Sodom, fire and sulfur rained down from heaven and destroyed them all. It will be just like this on the day the Son of Man is revealed.”

My understanding of the verses about Jesus’ second coming seems closer to the early church’s understanding. In my opinion, the verses in Matthew 24 and Luke 17 refer to the literal, visible appearance of Jesus Christ.

Keeping those verses in context indicates to me that at this coming all alive will see Him, both saved and lost. Again this is my camera angle. I will say that if the most common view of the rapture is true, I prefer it over the alternative, for those who experience the rapture are not on earth at the time of the great tribulation described in Revelation 15 and 16. Keep in mind that in both views Jesus is coming back for His own. And that is what is most important.

From my own personal understanding of eschatology (end-time events), The concept of the rapture of the church prior to the time of trouble doesn’t seem to apply. Let me give you a brief outline of my current thoughts regarding end-time events.

In doing so, I will be the first to admit that different scholars reach different conclusions as they look at scriptural prophecy in the books of Daniel and Revelation. The bottom line is that Jesus Christ is the victor. It is in Him and Him alone that salvation is obtained (see John 14:6).

With that said and without trying to give scriptural references to each element of my understanding, here are my thoughts. There will be a great time of trouble when God’s Spirit will be withdrawn, allowing Satan and evil’s full expression. God’s Spirit will not leave individuals though. As Jesus said,

Matthew 28 : 20

Christ’s second coming will be in real-time and history as He visibly descends from the sky. All those who are saved—first the resurrected dead and then those alive at His coming—will meet Jesus Christ in the air and ascend to heaven.

They will all have glorified bodies like Jesus’ body after His resurrection. All those who died in a lost condition prior to His coming will stay dead, and the lost who are alive will die the first common death at the glory of His coming. Thus, Satan will be alone, bound on earth for a thousand years.

The saved will reign with Christ a thousand years in heaven. The time spent in heaven during this period will be like a postgraduate study on the justice and rightness of God’s judgment of the lost and the wonders of the whole process of redemptive history.

It will be a time to get all the answers to the heretofore unanswerable why questions. After a thousand years, Christ will come to earth for the third time, this time with the New Jerusalem.

All the lost will now be raised to life with the same characters and bodies they had at death, and Satan will lead them in one last rebellious effort to overthrow God. Satan, the fallen angels, and lost humanity will recognize that they lack the character and desire to be part of God’s government of love.

The wages of sin spell death, and with nothing more, God could have done or can do to prevent the ultimate consequence of their sin and rebellion, a second and final death comes.

With a breaking heart, as expressed in Hosea 11, Matthew 23:37, and Romans 1, God honors their choice and gives them up, letting them go. Unshielded and like a consuming fire, the brightness of God’s glory cleanses and purifies the earth of the consequences of sin and sinners.

Thus, the lake of fire becomes the place of ultimate second death, where Satan, his evil angels, and all the lost are consumed and annihilated forevermore, the total end of sin and sinners.

The results of and the end to sin and rebellion are permanent, never to rise again. Sin and its consequences have run their full course. There is no place in the earth, under the earth, or beyond the earth where the lost will exist in perpetual suffering.

Life is in God and because of God; therefore, those who do not choose God will have no life, no existence. That’s why Jesus made the comparison to the dead carcasses thrown into the trash heap of Gehenna outside Jerusalem.

Decade after decade smoke continually arose from this desolate place. Thus, it became an apt metaphor for a place of total and permanent destruction.

After the fiery cleansing, the earth and heavens will be created new. God’s original plan for mankind to live in fellowship and harmony with Him will be more glorious and intimate than imaginable, lasting into eternity.

As 1 Corinthians 2:9 says, “No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has prepared for those that love him.” The redemptive sacrifice made by God through Jesus Christ will remain a wonder throughout time, and sin with all its consequences will be completely eliminated, never to rise again.

As a footnote to this description of end-time events, let me again say that the previously outlined scenario makes sense to me in explaining how a loving God would conclude the problem of sin and sinners.

With that said, I am sure I will be surprised at how things actually happen. One thing I truly believe is that the wicked will not be destroyed at the hands of an angry God and that God will not allow the continuous, eternal torture of sinners in a fiery hell, thus bringing no end to the consequence of sin and sinners.

Going back to the question at hand about the soon coming of Jesus, He said that the day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven. (see Matt. 24:36).

Matthew 24 : 36

As I stated earlier, many have tried to predict the date through various sections of Scripture, especially in Daniel and Revelation. All have been disappointed. We can’t know the time of Jesus’ second coming.

So what do we do with the promise of the second coming? First is the assurance that it will take place. The promises are there, and God is faithful and does not lie. It is the seeming delay that is most troubling. Throughout the centuries Christians have wanted that hope to be realized in their own lifetimes.

As an event, the second coming can be thought of in two ways. First, it is an event that will be immediate and certain at the point of one’s death. At the moment of our death, our next conscious moment will be Christ’s coming.

Secondly, it is an event coming in real-time and history that brings hope, encouragement, and fulfillment of the grandest promise imaginable. Whatever the conditions of life, the promise of the second coming supersedes discouragement and despair.

In Greek thought, as mentioned earlier, there is the belief in the dualistic nature of man, which postulates that at the moment of death the soul, which is a conscious, disembodied spirit, is separated from its earthly body and immediately goes to be with Jesus, consciously awaiting a new body at the second coming.

But others—and I am among this group—understand man as a physical being with a singular physical nature. He is born with a physical body, dies with a physical body, and is resurrected with a physical body in much the same way that Jesus Christ was resurrected with a physical body, all for the purpose of enjoying a new earth created for physical persons. Both concepts, however, share the same hope of man’s glorification in a new body, one that is free from the power and consequence of sin because of the doing and dying of Jesus Christ.

Thus, the second coming of Jesus Christ is one of hope, anticipation, assurance, immediacy (for at the moment of one’s death the next realization is His coming), and future historical reality. It is also a statement about the God who comes, a God who promised His coming and who keeps His promises.

It is an affirmation of a God who loves us and has done everything necessary for that coming. Our Creator—and recreator— is coming again, not just in Spirit, not just as a conceptual truth but physically and with full impact on all our senses. So along with the early Christian believers, I say, “Lord, come quickly!”

Your friend,
Matt

 

 

Jesus We Talk About Off The Hook

Jesus We Talk About Off The Hook

Dear Thomas,

In your fifth question you state, “Most people feel a person should be responsible for their actions, but the Christian says he has been let off the hook for his mistakes.

I think I have heard you say that Christians are justified or absolved. Does that mean they just don’t want to take personal responsibility for their actions and have created a neat way out?”

If you recall, in my response to your first question, I talked about what happened at the fall of mankind and how the effects of that fall have been passed down through all generations.

Thus, we have all fallen short of God’s original intention for us. We were born that way, and we find ourselves often living that way. The issue is this: What can we do about it?

As stated before (chapter 4), a reasonable case could be made that through self-help and effort, we can live pretty good lives, at least as others reflect on it. But all of us have to admit that we have made mistakes and consciously violated relationships.

We all have directly rebelled and acted unloving because of our self-centered interests. If we are guilty of such behavior, then we are stuck with the consequences.

As I have also mentioned before, Romans 6:23 says, “The wages of sin is death.” Like it or not, all of us have sinned, and all of us have a tendency to act toward self-interest and self-centeredness. All of us have exercised that self-interest and self-centeredness at the expense of others.

If God means what He says and the wages, the payment, or consequence of sin is death, because of our disconnect from God, then you and I are on death row. We may be model prisoners, but we are still subject to a penalty as justly decreed.

You and I may not like the consequences, but the good news is that God doesn’t like the consequences either. You and I can’t do anything about it. We are guilty. But God can and has done something about the dilemma we find ourselves in! Reflecting on my answers to some of your other questions,I repeat that that is what salvation or God’s rescue is all about.

God wants to heal us from our natural tendency to act from this innate sinful condition. He wants to heal us from unloving actions and self-centeredness. He wants us to experience a new beginning, a new birth, a new heritage where that tendency is not the primary operative in our lives. He wants us to become alive by being in a relationship with Him, spiritually alive. And it is all done because of and through the incarnation, life, and sacrifice of Jesus Christ.

God takes no pleasure in the death of the wicked but wants them to turn from evil and live (see Ezek. 33:11). That is a real contrast from the idea that God is eagerly waiting to judge and condemn. It eliminates a legal and judgmental understanding of the gospel that views God as the judge, jury, and executioner who has no remorse assigning the ultimate penalty for offenses against His law.

That just isn’t the way God acts. God’s love for us is constant and unconditional. We don’t have to carry around all the old baggage of faults and mistakes or even the guilt from them. We are loved, forgiven, and set back into the right relationship with God, who by open invitation says, “Come, the wages [or consequences] have been paid. I forgive you.” Our willing response to that invitation is called justification. In it, we are forgiven, freed from blame, declared guiltless, and absolved from our past failures as expressed in Chapter 3.

This is not just a neat way out but a fantastic way out, one delivered at a tremendous cost. It took the perfect life and death of Jesus Christ to accomplish it. It took an excruciatingly painful experience of separation between God the Father and His Son, Jesus Christ, who joined Himself with humanity, which no created being will ever truly understand.

From the moment that Jesus agonized in the garden of Gethsemane to His eventual death on the cross, God’s heart was ripped apart. The Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit are one in community, the same in essence.

When Jesus said on the cross,  He was experiencing a breach in His relationship with the Father and Holy Spirit as He took on the sins of the world. Jesus completed what needed to be done for our rescue.

Matthew 27 : 46

The question should be asked, “How does this act put us in the right relationship with God and become active in our lives?” The rescue is not forced on anyone.

It is what a gracious God offers any sinner who will choose it. And how do we choose it? It is as simple as asking for it and then accepting it.

It is a relationship with the rescuer. It is recognizing our need for a Savior and faith in the one who saves. But that is not always easy for the person who has genuine doubts about Jesus Christ as God or even the existence of God Himself. Many, therefore, have prayed a skeptic’s prayer. Such a prayer might sound like this:

God, I doubt. I am not sure You even exist. I am not sure that Jesus Christ is my personal Savior. I don’t know what is myth and what is truth. To be honest,I just don’t know.

But if You do exist, if You do relate personally to those who seek You, I want to know. I want to seek the truth and know the truth about You. Please let me know.

If, in honest thought and desire, you want God to be active in your life, you can pray a sinner’s prayer to ask for forgiveness and invite the Spirit of Jesus Christ into your life. Numerous versions are available, but basically a sinner’s prayer first acknowledges your need or condition and expresses a desire for change.

It recognizes who Jesus is and what He did for you. The salvation He offers as a free gift is offered through grace (endowed with favor). And it expresses the belief that God, through His Spirit, will honor your request. As 1 John 1:9 says,

1 John 1 : 9

 

Nothing will stop God’s coming to the person who desires it. The Bible says in Romans 8:37-39, No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

The sinner’s prayer is one that I myself find need of. It is a prayer that expresses desires that seem to be a constant on this side of heaven. Thus, a sinner’s prayer might sound something like this:

Jesus, please forgive me. I regret the things I have done against You, myself, and others. Eliminate those things in my life that I know to be wrong. Thank You for giving Your life for me on the cross so that I can be forgiven.

I want You in my life. I accept Your free gift of grace. Thank You for Your forgiveness and acceptance. Thank You for coming into my life and promising to be with me now and forever. In Jesus’ name, I pray. Amen.

I realize, Thomas, that you may not be ready to turn to God with either a skeptic’s or a sinner’s prayer. I have not yet answered many of your questions. But when the time comes, remember these examples of prayers and use them in any way you want to help you turn to God.

God is just waiting for the opportunity to strike up a real and personal relationship with you, one that will be truly life-changing both now and forever.

I was very young when I said the sinner’s prayer similar to the one above. What an enormous difference it has made in my life! I invite you to recognize the person of Jesus and invite Him into your life as well.

You may wonder, however, what assurance any of us have that such a simple request of inviting God, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit into our lives really changes anything.

How do we know it will really happen that we will become spiritually alive though we were formerly spiritually dead? How can we be assured that a simple prayer initiated by invitation from the Holy Spirit’s own prompting will somehow change us?

What is there about sin and how it got into us—original sin and where it came from—and the very nature of God in relation to it that gives you or me any assurance of freedom from it? Where did it all start, this sin problem, and how did we get caught in it? What happened that there even needed to be a way out?

Historically in religious and theological circles, many debates have raged about the understanding of original sin. Where did the failings, distortions, rebelliousness, and man’s self-centeredness come from? What happened to mankind that resulted in all the self-inflicted and othersinflicted pain experienced by humankind?

What causes us as human beings to crave power and control over others? What leads us to inflict emotional, physical, or spiritual injury, hurt, or even death to others, knowingly or unknowingly? Where does our disregard for parents and others or our lying, cheating, stealing, coveting, lusting, and murdering, be it in thought or action, come from? Can a justifiable cause or reason be found for this distortion and deviation from an original norm of life where sin, as expressed in all of its forms, did not exist?

If God is the first cause of all that is and if all causes lead infinitely back to the first cause, can we then blame God for sin’s existence? And if we can, does that mean God is flawed in some way?

And if that is so, can we put our faith and trust in a flawed God? If God is flawed, then why or how could we be condemned for being flawed? These are all philosophical questions, for sure, but what is the biblical answer to them?

I agree with those who assert that a reason or cause for original sin does not exist. If any cause for its existence could be found, then the whole idea of a God of perfect love who is holy, just, and righteous would be suspect.

Someone had to break that causal chain somewhere along the line. If no cause or reason can be found within God and the way He constructed and ran His universe, then what? It is obvious that sin and evil do exist.

Arguments for the causes and reasons for sin’s existence are many, all of which began with Satan and were brought by Satan against God Himself It was and continues to be Satan, the Evil One, who continually accuses God of being unfair to His creation and His creatures.

Satan claimed that God was holding back from us what was rightfully and potentially ours, which was for each person to choose what was right and desirable for himself. Satan accuses God of being harsh, arbitrary, judgmental, angry, wrathful, and unloving, always watching, recording, and searching for those that He can send to eternal destruction. Satan’s claims and the war he has waged against God are at the center of the human condition.

It was Satan, the father of deception and lies, the one who distorted the truth about God, who came to man in Genesis 3, convincing Eve and then Adam that God was withholding something from them that they should desire and have. Satan’s accusation was that God was untrustworthy and withholding their highest potential from them.

He convinced Adam and Eve that they could be godlike, which was never God’s intention for them. They were created to be spiritually alive in body and soul (mind, emotions, and will), free to experience an eternal, loving relationship with their Creator. However, the choices and actions of our original parents broke that relationship with God.

Because of that break, something died in them and has remained dead in all their progeny until it is made alive again by the prompting of the Holy Spirit and man’s willingness to listen and respond.

We were created to have God at the center of our being. It is interesting that the Tree of Lifes was located in the Garden of Eden but not at the center. Another tree stood at the very center of the garden.

God told Adam and Eve not to eat from that tree. It was called the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil (see Gen. 2:17; 3:3). In effect, God told Adam, “Don’t go there!” God did not want mankind to place himself at the center of making judgments on what was good and what was evil, which eating from the tree symbolized. It was for God alone to make those judgments.

Once mankind ate from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, we became self-centered instead of God-centered. Ever since that event, all of us have been making judgments about what is good and what is evil based on our individual perspectives, worldviews, religious understanding, and self-analysis.

Is it any wonder that history has recorded so many conflicts? Since Adam and Eve’s fall, God has been ejected from the center of our lives, and we now know and experience evil. God never intended it to be that way, but the distortion of the truth and the lies of Satan prevailed in the garden.

Man’s eating from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil meant death—instant spiritual death and eventual physical death (Gen. 3:4-6). Eve and then Adam made a fatal error in judgment about God.

Why was Satan in the garden in the first place? If Satan had been prohibited from being in the garden, he could never have tempted Eve, and how different our history might have been! But God is love, and love requires freedom.

True love also requires trust between lovers. God wanted and continues to want a free, open, truthful, and trustful relationship with His created beings. Adam and Eve had no reason to doubt the truthfulness of God’s Word that eating from that one particular tree would lead to death, but they also had the freedom to do so.

Though God allowed the Serpent, the Evil One, to be present at the tree, Adam and Eve were free to avoid it as God had strongly advised. However, they failed to heed God’s advice and listened to Satan instead.

The consequence was immediate. They no longer enjoyed oneness with God. From a new self-centered, self-determined position, they judged that God did not have their best interests at heart and was holding back their rightful access to wisdom and knowledge of what was good and what was evil (see Gen. 3).

Adam and Eve’s response to Satan’s lies and deceptions initiated the history of sin and rebellion, but it also began the redemptive history of God’s rescue. By believing a lie, Adam and Eve failed to love God with all their hearts, minds, and souls, but God never changed His love for them or for us. Scripture tells us Satan’s origin and his ultimate end.

Revelation 12 : 7- 9

The why of Satan’s downfall and his ultimate end is analogous to and spoken of in the prophecy against the king of Tyre in Ezekiel 28:12 19.

You were the model of perfection, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty. You were in Eden, the garden of God; every precious stone adorned you: ruby, topaz and emerald, chrysolite, onyx and jasper, sapphire, turquoise and beryl. Your settings and mountings were made of gold; on the day you were created, they were prepared.

You were anointed as a guardian cherub, for so I ordained you. You were on the holy mount of God; you walked among the fiery stones. You were blameless in your ways from the day you were created till wickedness was found in you. Through your widespread trade, you were filled with violence, and you sinned.

So I drove you in disgrace from the mount of God, and I expelled you, O guardian cherub, from among the fiery stones. Your heart became proud on account of your beauty, and you corrupted your wisdom because of your splendor. So I threw you to the earth; I made a spectacle of you before kings.

By your many sins and dishonest trade, you have desecrated your sanctuaries. So I made a fire come out from you and it consumed you, and I reduced you to ashes on the ground in the sight ofall who were watching. All the nations who knew you are appalled at you; you have come to a horrible end and will be no more.

In John 8:44, Jesus said that the Devil is a liar and the Father of lies. He has always lied about God and the truth about God as revealed in Jesus Christ. This created angelic being’s rebellion is explained further in Scripture. Isaiah 14:12-15 tells us this:

How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations! You said in your heart, “I will ascend to heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of God; I will sit enthroned on the mount of assembly, on the utmost heights of the sacred mountain. I will ascend above the tops of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.”

Satan lied to Eve when he claimed that God had lied to her when He declared the consequence of violating their trust relationship. As stated in Genesis 3:4-5, Satan told Eve, “You will not surely die. For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”

Exactly how Satan turned from being the most highly honored angel in heaven to the Evil One is not fully explained. We have only a few Scripture passages describing Satan’s rebellion and the subsequent consequences.

But if Satan lived in a perfect, loving, and sin-free environment, enjoying a position of honor, how and why did he develop into such an evil creature?

Now what follows is pure speculation on my part. Please understand this. There is no scriptural evidence for what I am about to say, except for the way I have tried to read between the lines. I have an idea that affords me a context and frame of reference when thinking about how Satan came to his stance against God.

First, consider the communal nature of God in the Trinity—the Father, the Son, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit. When I think of the Father or Holy Spirit, I have no physical image of them. Regarding the Father, I don’t know what all power and glory look like. I also don’t know what the Holy Spirit looks like.

I have assumed that they are not molecular and are beyond my ability to visualize. Because Jesus Christ was God incarnate, God in the flesh taking on our humanity, I can easily visualize Him. Thus, my primary access to contemplate and understand the nature of God is through Jesus Christ.

Scripture talks quite often of angels and heavenly beings (see Luke 2:13), who are all created beings. Could it be that prior to His coming to earth, Jesus Christ was to the angels and heavenly beings that special, visible, and even physical link with the Trinity that He was for us? Being truly God, was Jesus in a form that the angels and heavenly beings could easily relate to?

If such was the case and Satan was the highest-ranking created being, seemingly almost equal with Jesus in the heavenly realm, could he have wondered why Jesus enjoyed such super status as God and he did not? Could Satan have assumed an equality that was not possible for him as a created being?

When Jesus participated in the communal nature of the Godhead, could envy and jealousy have taken root in Satan without reason or cause? And if Satan allowed these thoughts to persist and nurtured them by spreading discontent among the other angels, might there have been an eventual conflict to the point of war in heaven?

As Scripture says, a heavenly creature, a created being, Satan, wanted to become like the Most High—even above the Most High—meaning any person of the Godhead but especially the Son. Remember, while Jesus was on earth, Satan tried to persuade Jesus to worship him.

Genesis 3 : 4

All of these ambitions and lies of Satan have taken root in the nature of man in his pursuit of being a god unto himself. It is not surprising that man has thus constructed concepts—even religious ones—that make him the center of focus in ascending to the transcendent.

He tries to ascend to God all by his own will and striving. Too often from man’s point of view and judgment, he can reach God purely through his own efforts and actions. Man’s egocentricity seems to require it to be so.

Yet the Bible says it is just the opposite. There is nothing in man that leads to God. It is God who comes to man, and it is this coming that is at the heart of the gospel. It is this coming that was exhibited by God in the garden when He said to Adam, “Where are you?” (Gen. 3:9). It was God who came to save mankind from total deception, depravation, and destruction in the story of Noah and the flood (see Genesis 6-9). It was God who came to Abram (see Genesis 12).

It was God who came to Jacob in a dream at Bethel (Gen. 28:10—16). It was God who led Joseph to his position in Egypt (see Genesis 37-50). It was God who came to the deliverance of Israel as expressed in the book of Exodus. It was God who gave the tabernacle and sacrificial system as symbols to Israel of the perpetual promise of His redemptive work.

And it was God who came to fulfill that redemptive work through Jesus Christ. It was God who gave the Law as a teacher, a guidepost showing man’s need for a Savior, his need for faith in God, and his need for the one to come. And most importantly, it is God in Jesus and the Holy Spirit who has come, is continuously coming, and will continue to come to man.

Jesus said, “I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full” (John 10:10). This is not just eternal life but the abundant life expressed in Galatians 5:22.

Think what life would be like with an abundance of love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. This is what David understood and requested in Psalm 51:10 when he said, “Create in me a pure heart, O God, and renew a steadfast spirit within me.”

The book of Romans is rich with the expressions of God’s coming and doing in man that which is impossible for man to do in and by himself. Romans 8:26 says, “The Holy Spirit prays for us.” Romans 8:34 explains, “Christ intercedes for us.”

Romans 8:31 declares, “If God is for us, who can be against us? Romans 8:35 proclaims, “It is God who justifies [or puts us right]. Romans 8:37 exhorts, “Nothing can separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Romans 12:2 encourages, “Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind.”

In summary, it is God in Jesus Christ, through the work of the Holy Spirit, who is the Redeemer of the world. It is God who does His good and perfect work in man, not man redeeming himself through what he judges as good works, good thoughts, or good efforts. It is not man ascending to God but God descending to man.

If there is anything for man to do, it is that of being a receptor of God’s love. In John 6:28, Jesus’ disciples asked Him, “What must we do to do the works God requires?” Listen closely to the answer Jesus gave in verse 29, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”

Notice that even the believing is the work of God, and the doing is also the work of God. And by believing, we are changed. We are changed in our understanding of just how much God loves us, accepts us, and incorporates us within His family. Listen again to Jesus’ prayer in John 17:20-23.

My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me.

I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one: I in them and you in me. May they be brought to complete unity to let the world know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.

All this evidence was brought about by God’s trustworthiness in executing His rescue of mankind. This adds to our faith and thus to a life that reflects our connectedness to God in the right relationship with his Creator.

The Spirit within us is alive. The “Christ in us” is actively doing its work within, slowly and surely healing our souls (mind, emotions, and will) from the effects of sin. Through trust, faith, and love relationships, we start reflecting on the love given to us in Christ.

It is this coming to a man that has always been the nature of God. Jesus will return to this world. It will be experienced by all our senses just as His first coming some two thousand years ago was. Let off the hook? Personal responsibility? Neat way out? Yes, yes, and no.

In Jesus Christ and through the work of the Holy Spirit, God has graciously given us a way of escape from the consequences of sin by who He is and what He did and does, all of which is made effective by our free choice.

It is a magnificent and glorious way out of the brokenness of this world, and it is offered as a free gift. It can be yours, for it is free for the asking and free for the taking. Remember the prayers detailed in this chapter.

Your friend,
Matt

 

 

 

Jesus We Talk About What Good Is It?

Jesus We Talk About What Good Is It?

Dear Thomas,

In question six you ask, “I know people who are really good people but who are not Christians. I also know other people who say they are Christians but who are not so good when it comes to morals and ethics. What good is it to be a Christian if it doesn’t affect the way people live, except for maybe the way they spend their Sundays?” This question is one that engenders sadness in me.

I will address this question by talking about how some people use the church for personal reasons and how others discover spiritual connection and growth both within and outside the Christian church. I also need to talk about the goodness factor outside the Christian community and how that relates to Jesus Christ.

Your reflection on some of the lives of churchgoers is probably true. There are those who go to church out of habit. For others, going to church is just something they ought to do. It is good socialization for their kids. It helps their status and respectability in the community.

It is an insurance policy against the flames of hell. It is about spiritual record-keeping, making sure the heavenly books are in order and in their favor. It is about being reminded of what they should or should not do in regard to moral and ethical living. And it may be just about getting a good pep talk once a week.

For still other people, being a Christian and going to church have nothing to do with worshipping God or developing a relationship with Him. Instead, it is all about social networking and self-serving interests.

In such cases, it would not be surprising that the moral and ethical values expressed in Christianity might not get transferred to the daily lives of those who claim to be its adherents.

Toward the end of Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, which is recorded in Matthew 7:16, Jesus said, “By their fruit you will recognize them.” Then in verses 21 to 23, He said, “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’”

Nonetheless, I must tell you that a vast number of others within the church are seeing their lives being changed and discovering strength and power in reading and hearing the meaning of God’s Word in Scripture. They look forward with much delight to the opportunity to worship God collectively.

Church gatherings, fellowship, and instruction aid their process of becoming free of the sin problem through Christ and finding healing from its effects. God calls us to this kind of corporate activity because it results in our growing up from that beginning state of being justified, absolved, and put right with God, as talked about in earlier questions.

It also assists in healing us from the damages of sin foisted on us by others as well as the damage we have inflicted upon ourselves. It can strengthen our resistance to our natural inclination toward sin as well as release us from the power and control of sin over our lives. It can be where the Holy Spirit is most active in our lives.

Church can be a place to exercise our faith and find aids for that faith. It can be a place of learning how to love as God loves, to look outward, to be other-directed instead of self-serving and inner-directed. It is a fellowship with others who are also in the process of becoming what God intended them to be.

All this is done not from self-effort but by the work of God’s Spirit within us. It is letting God remold our minds from the inside out (see Rom. 12:2). Thus, church attendance can certainly be a place of growing and maturing in our relationship with Jesus Christ.

Church provides a place where we can ask like the apostle Paul asked when he met Jesus on the road to Damascus, “What shall I do, Lord?” or, “Lord, what would You have me do?” (Acts 22:10).

It is a special gathering where you and I can willingly relinquish sovereign control of our lives into the hands of the Creator, who loves us and always has our best interests in mind. And together as the church we can also support and encourage one another to do so.

The rewards for our participation can be awesome. The Bible speaks of the fruits of the Spirit in Galatians 5:22—23, saying “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control.” Wouldn’t it be nice to experience the fullness of these attributes beginning with loving each other and experiencing its joy?

Living in a broken world, wouldn’t it be wonderful to walk in a peace that leads us to be patient and kind? Another result of giving our lives faithfully into the hands of the Creator is goodness that is expressed in a gentle and self-controlled spirit.

Think of what it would mean if everyone around us demonstrated these character traits. Jesus talked about “the kingdom of God.” These attributes are what the kingdom is about.

The Spirit within becomes the means of life transformed. Beyond the good news of Jesus Christ, this is what the true church is all about. As some say, it is a hospital for sinners. It is the communion point where healing takes place.

It is a place of celebration of this healing and of the God who heals. It is a family of believers, and as in all families, though there are some dysfunctional members, they are yet still family. It is the collective expression of God at work in His people.

There was another part of your question that needs to be addressed. Where does the goodness in non-Christians come from? What makes them good, caring, and loving even though they have nothing to do with a church, do not claim to be Christians, and do not believe in Jesus Christ in the terms I have talked about and may even question the very existence of God?

First, let me say what a privilege it is to be in a relationship with a personal God. What a privilege it is to sense the love, peace, and joy of His presence, to pray or just talk to Him and experience His answers in the form of thoughts, an inner voice other than your own, or an arrangement of circumstances.

What a thrill it is to hear His voice through Scripture, the words of other writers, and other people’s personal experiences in their own“prayer and fox” story (see chapter 2). The privilege of belonging to God as an individual family member is awesome!

Knowing what it is like to know Jesus Christ personally by the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, I do not understand why anyone would not want to have and enjoy that relationship. It is the most freeing and liberating experience possible.

Every human being not only needs this experience but also has the privilege of accepting it. I also think that every human being would long for this relationship if each understood the true nature and character of God. And it is there for the asking and there for the taking, a free gift from the God who loves us.

However, much of the world’s population, both now and in history, has not experienced a personal relationship with God in Jesus Christ. Much of the world has never heard of him. Even if they have, many are culturally locked into other religious belief systems. Or if they have heard of Jesus, the ones presenting Him did it in such a way that they rejected Him.

For much of the world Jesus Christ is just a Western Christian belief system just as the Western Christian world thinks of Buddhism, Confucius, or Mohammed as an Eastern or Middle Eastern construct.

At the same time, because of the doing and dying of Jesus Christ, no one comes to God except through Jesus Christ. There is no other way to salvation. All men are saved by the grace of God through Jesus. That fact is very clear in Scripture. Jesus said, as quoted in John 14:6

John 14 : 6

Does that mean that anyone who does not know and claim the name of Jesus Christ is lost irrespective of the reason why? Does it mean there is no salvation or rescue for human beings who have the misfortune of being born in the wrong culture or the wrong time and place in history?

Does this mean the millions of Asians, Indians, and Africans who happened to live prior to Christ’s birth or prior to the expansion of Christianity through Western missionaries were just out of luck? Does this mean that in God’s eyes, these are just unfortunate human beings? Does He just throw them away? Or worse, does He condemn them to eternal destruction? What a ghastly thought!

I think not. This is not the way a loving, caring, gracious God acts. God isn’t so egocentric that His name, as Scripture identifies it, is an absolute must for salvation. Those who lived before Jesus Christ are still saved through Jesus Christ, just like those who lived during and after His time.

Romans 4:3 clearly states, “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness.” He did not know Jesus Christ in the sense that we know Him after His physical presence on earth. Nor did all those other people of faith listed in Hebrews 11. So if there are those who were saved before Christ without knowledge of Him. Likewise, there will be those saved after Christ without knowledge of Him.

Scripture says that the laws of nature, the glory of the earth and heavens above, are adequate to instruct the conscience. “For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities —his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse” (Rom. 1:20). “For it is not those who hear the law who are righteous in God’s sight, but it is those who obey the law who will be declared righteous.

Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law since they show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts now accusing, now even defending them” (Rom. 2:13—15).

Thus, “God will give to each person according to what he has done” (Rom. 2:6). The “done” here refers to our response to the promptings or wooing of God’s Spirit in an attitude of repentance. “To those who by persistence in doing good. he will give eternal life” (Rom. 2:7).

There is an alight of truth about right and wrong, about the ability to love that is given to every person who is born. God has created the ability—a place if you please—for God’s Spirit or the Holy Spirit to dwell within every person.

Every person at some time in his or her life, regardless of the historical time, culture, or beliefs, has the opportunity to respond to that Spirit, to respond to love. “For God is love” (1 John 4:16).

Jesus said in Matthew 22:37, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”

However, God may be unidentified or unknown, as the apostle Paul noted in his address to the Romans at Mars Hill (Acts 17:22-23), or it may be that God has a different identification or description from the one that you and I are most familiar with.

But God is not boxed into or limited by Christianity. His Spirit works on the heart of each person whether a churchgoer or not, whether a professed Christian or not, and whether an adherent to some other belief system or not. As John 1:9 says, “The true light that gives light to every man was coming into the world.”

That light is Jesus Christ, and that light is the work of the Holy Spirit. “Every man” means every human life ever born. Thus, God’s Spirit is at work in each human soul, wooing each person to the desire to become spiritually alive by responding to the Spirit’s prompting.

It is not just a matter of being good and exhibiting good ethics and morals. Mere outward conformity to the best social standards or religious laws is not what good behavior is about. An external action to attain certain rewards is not the motive God wants us to aspire to. Rather, He desires for us to act from a relational, other-centered love that comes from our very hearts or cores.

Having said that, I think that kind of love would certainly affect a person’s ethics and morals, but such love does not come from the natural man who is spiritually dead. That may have been the problem with the rich young ruler when he said,

Matthew 19 : 20

He seemed to lack the spiritual enlivening from within by God’s Spirit. He lacked the other-centered spirit of love. He thought it was all about external behaviors.

Keeping that in mind makes it easy to see why we can find what can be described as good people both inside and outside the church. Behavior alone is not the determination of goodness that Jesus talked about, and it is also not at the core of God’s rescue and healing.

His Spirit is one of other-centered love that operates at a deeper level than labels of faith and conformity to rules of law, religious or otherwise. That Spirit can be active in a person who attends church as well as in someone who does not.

But that does not lessen the value or rewards of attending church with its fellowship, instruction, and aid to faith spoken of earlier.

However, the danger of thinking that salvation is linked to a specific church’s beliefs and creeds is very real. If specific beliefs and creeds were vital to God’s ability to rescue and heal us, then conforming to a particular church’s body of beliefs and creeds would be very important.

Out of that importance would raise efforts at conformity and unity of action within the body of believers. But that can lead to religious totalitarianism, and history is replete with the consequences of that misguided structure.

For example, some sects of Islam today require conformity to particular sharia law. During the Middle Ages and the Crusades, Christianity did much the same.

Then there are the smaller totalitarian belief systems found within cults, such as those espoused by Jim Jones or David Koresh, with disastrous results.

From my understanding, whether we go to church, claim to be Christian, or demonstrate good ethics or morals is not the most important thing. The most important realization is this: By the work of the Holy Spirit, Jesus Christ works on each person’s heart for salvation.

It is one’s response that is most important judged by God alone. God doesn’t stop His work for and within those who are outside the Christian community. However, He does use the church as a collective body of individuals to advance His efforts.

Building designs, forms of worship, and methods of study and outreach may vary a great deal from church to church. Within that variance are the personal successes, struggles, and failures of each churchgoer.

I am not sure it is useful to judge any particular churchgoer by how he or she performs in relation to a particular church’s standards. None of us knows the damages, hurts, and struggles of any other person.

We can’t judge what we don’t know. Only God knows the true heart of a person. Some people may be good play actors, performing well to a church’s social ideals while remaining spiritually very sick.

Others may constantly fight inner demons and life damage that are obvious to those around them, yet they are spiritually alive and on the road to healing.

Finally, some people in churches are spiritually alive and have come a long way in the healing process, and they exhibit other-centered love representative of Jesus Christ.

So good behavior is a matter of externals, whether performed inside or outside a church, inside or outside other belief systems. It is not the core of human spirituality—being enlivened by the Spirit of God is. That is a free gift! And yes, that free gift is because of and through Jesus Christ, whether identified or not. The evidence is other-centered love.

Your friend,
Matt

 

 

 

Jesus We Talk About Saved Anyway

Jesus We Talk About Saved Anyway

Dear Thomas,

In your seventh question, you asked, “If there is life after death and if I am a good person (have integrity, am morally and ethically honest, and live the social values that Christians talk about), why wouldn’t a loving and just God save me even if I didn’t buy into all that Christian religious stuff?”

There are a number of issues in this one question. First is the question of whether there really is life after death. Then there is the question about what it means to be a good person and how that goodness relates to being saved. Third, there is a question about what kind of God God is and if His judgment is fair.

And finally comes the question about buying into all that “Christian religious stuff.” By that, I presume you mean the beliefs that lead to the religious practices of prayer, reading the Bible, and meeting with other Christians to support one another and grow in spiritual understanding.

It may also mean attending Sunday school and church worship services, taking part in communion and other aspects of a particular church’s liturgy, giving tithes and offerings to the church, and other such activities.

Those are all valid questions, but let’s begin with the question of life after death. Nearly all humanity throughout the ages, no matter the religious belief system, has had some construct of life after death.

At the deepest level of our sense of being, death is unnatural. Anyone who has been to the funeral of a young child knows there is something terribly wrong with death. Death really does not make any sense when much of the cosmos seems to have an eternal component.

Something must account for it, and there must be some alternative to it—that is, unless you are a materialist who believes there is nothing other than matter and that physical death is the total end of all living things. But for those who believe there is something beyond death, one of several constructs is usually embraced.

First is the construct of reincarnation, a belief that when we die, we come back to a new and different life in a different form. Reincarnation sees life in a perpetual circular motion going from eon to eon.

We die only to come to life again, either to a better life or a worse life, to a higher life-form or lower life-form, depending on our success at living in the previous life.

Then there is pantheism, the belief that human beings, like all things, are part of an eternal God. In this construct, God is in everything and is everywhere. God is in the rocks and the soil, in trees and plants, in anything that has any molecular structure. God is all in all, but thus, He is not personal and not relational.

The birth and death ofall things, whether stars in the universe or people on Earth, are just parts of the process that make up the idea of God. The death of one thing may give life to another thing but not necessarily the same thing; however, the other thing is still part of God, which it was in the first place.

Then there is the belief in the immortality of the soul that says at death a person becomes a disembodied spirit as the soul detaches from the body. This concept identifies the soul as not just mind, emotions, and will but rather as something within a person that has no physical or material reality yet controls the functions of thinking and willing, hence determining all attitudes, emotions, and behavior.

Here the soul lives on after the point of death, though with no physical body. In this construct, the soul is the very essence of a person deep down and all the way through. It never dies, though the flesh may perish. It separates from the body at death and continues to exist with a spirit life of its own outside the body.

The immortality of the soul makes the assumption that the soul has life by right once it has come into being. Once it comes into being, it can never go out of being, can never be extinguished, and can never not be. It is only a matter of what kind of eternal life it will have.

Finally, there is the construct of resurrection, the physical body coming back to life as an immortal body. Christianity has understood resurrection from the dead through Scripture and as specifically validated through the resurrection of Jesus and His personal promises concerning a resurrected life after death.

In 1 Corinthians 15:20, it says, “But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who have fallen asleep.” Verse 42 of that same chapter says, “So will it be with the resurrection of the dead. The body that is sown is perishable, it is raised imperishable.” When Jesus appeared to the disciples after His resurrection, He said to them,

Luke 24 : 38 - 39

When Jesus ascended to heaven, He promised that He would come back to claim His own. Our resurrection or our translation if we are alive at Jesus’ second coming will take place at that time (see chapter 6, “No Coming”).

I don’t think Jesus was wrong, mistaken, or talking nonsense when He affirmed that life would exist after death, that death as we know it isn’t the end. Besides Jesus’ resurrection, God gave us two examples. One was Elijah, who was translated (see 2 Kings 2:11—12), and one was Moses, who was resurrected (see Deut. 34:1-6; Matt. 17:1-3).

Because of who Jesus is, His comments about life after death as well as His own resurrection confirm the reality of life after death. This belief in the resurrection is crucial to the Christian faith, for as the apostle Paul said in 1 Corinthians 15:17-19, “If Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins. Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ are lost. If only for this life we have hope in Christ, we are to be pitied more than all men.”

None of your questions and none of my answers hold any relevance except for one’s orientation of life here on earth if Jesus Christ was not raised and there is no life after death. Of course, some would disagree; some would suggest that religion is humanity’s way of injecting meaning into a life that is fundamentally random and meaningless. However, if there is life after death and I am convinced by Scripture that there is— your questions have extreme relevance.

Let me address the issue of being a good person. The good you are talking about is behavior or performance in relation to some standard. Christianity is not about performance it is about a relationship, a broken relationship that needs healing and needs to be put back together.

It is this relational aspect of Christianity that separates it from all other world religions. All of the other great world religions require performance as the measurement for rewards in the afterlife. Unfortunately, a lot of performance-based rewards have crept into Christianity, as well.

It is true that the relationship with a loving and righteous God will be exhibited in a person’s behavior. It is an understood principle that we become like the person we listen to, watch, admire, and even worship.

Thus, if you find Christians talking about honesty, integrity, promise-keeping, fidelity, fairness, care for others, respect for others, responsible citizenship, the pursuit of excellence, and accountability, they are talking about aspects of what it means to love. Yet someone could perform relatively well in all these categories, yet not love at all, but rather perform purely out of self-interest.

If a man says, “I’ll bring flowers to my wife, and I’ll help with the housework. I’ll help her take care of the kids. I’ll wash her car, and I’ll even fold the clothes. Then maybe I’ll be rewarded and get what I want,” he is acting from self-interest.

But if he does these things just because he loves his wife with no reward in mind except to see her burden lightened, to make her life a greater joy, and to communicate continually and validate his love and admiration for her, his performance is motivated by love.

The outward performance is the same in both cases, but one is based on self-interest while the other is based on love that is other-centered. It is this kind of other-centered relational love that Christianity is all about.

It is about being loved by and loving in return a gracious, trustworthy, loving, relational Creator God who first loved us and has always loved us.

Next what kind of a God is God, and is He fair? Throughout its span of history, from creation to recreation as well as in the life and history of Jesus Christ, the Bible indicates that God, infinite in power and glory, Creator and Sustainer of all that is, loves.

I can tell you that our Trinitarian God desires a personal and direct relationship with each of us both now and forever. And as we choose to enter into that relationship, we continually discover evidence of His trustworthiness, faithfulness, forgiveness, and care.

By beholding Him through all His activity that makes up our rescue, we are changed. Our love for Him grows, and the desire to honor and worship Him increases.

Yes, God is fair, but He is also gracious. However, we must want to receive that grace personally, for God is always respectful of our freedom as individuals.

Furthermore, for grace to become effective in our lives, we must recognize its value and choose it with that choice aided by the Holy Spirit. It is not something that comes by way of good deeds.

Our redemption, our healing from the consequences of sin and brokenness comes to us as a free gift from the one who creates, recreates, and heals as we allow His Spirit to be enlivened within us and we follow His promptings.

Last ofall was your question about all the Christian religious stuff and your participation in it. As my presumption previously defined “the stuff,” why wouldn’t a person want to participate? God created us for fellowship with Him and one another.

Religious stuff is about the healing process— that is, learning about, acknowledging, and praising the God who heals and about the celebration of being healed.

The style of Christian worship services and fellowship varies widely. That is because each of us has a different personality and different thinking style. This affects our perceptions, actions, and activities.

Our brains and nervous systems are wired differently. Some of us are naturally left-handed, while others are right-handed. Some of us lead our vision with our right eye while others rely on the left. Some kick with the right foot, while others prefer the left.

Similarly, we think differently too. Some of us are introverts, while others are extroverts. Some of us are creative and musical, while others are analytical and logical. Some like great variety, while others are very organized and exacting.

Some of us are leaders, and others are servant followers. Some like harmony at all costs, and others push to meet personal goals. No one style is particularly better than the others. They are all just different.

Some people receive information and experiences primarily through visual means, while others absorb through touch or kinesthetic means. Still others receive information and experiences through hearing or auditory means.

In Gary Chapman’s book The Five Love Languages, he explains that expressions of love are more meaningful to different individuals when they are received in certain ways.

Add to all this the diversity of our gifts and talents, and you can easily see the need for a wide variety of religious expressions. Therefore, a meaningful style of worship depends on who we are and how our systems are wired.

Thus, it is appropriate to find a fellowship that gives us the greatest input for who we are as persons. The “Christian religious stuff of religious worship practices and fellowship should meet as closely as possible the same spiritual, intellectual, and emotional “stuff’ we are made of.

Remember, as long as it expresses the love of God through Jesus Christ, the particular religious institution or affiliation is not of the greatest importance. Rather, having a meaningful expression of a relationship with the living God and sharing that relationship with others is key.

Having said that, I must add that I feel it is very important that the particular institution, religious affiliation, or fellowship represent and tell the truth about God. And that truth is that God is love and continually descends to mankind to redeem, rescue, and heal us from the effects of this world’s brokenness and the effects of our own internal brokenness. The means and style in which this is done may vary widely from megachurches to what Jesus said in

Matthew 18 : 20

God delights in and promotes fellowship within all human relationships, inside or outside churches. God loves community in all its forms for loving, reconciling, and healing people. God’s working on men’s hearts and minds as expressed in the very nature of your questions is what it is all about.

God’s Spirit is active in you; otherwise, you would not have bothered to ask so many questions or read my responses to them. God’s desire is for you to know the answers in a way that leads to a relationship with Him. And no matter what my answers might be, they would be meaningless and fall on deaf ears if the Holy Spirit weren’t continually at work within you. As we read in 1 Corinthians 2:10-14,

The Spirit searches all things, even the deep things of God. For who among men knows the thoughts of a man except the man’s spirit within him? In the same way, no one knows the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God. We have not received the spirit of the world but the Spirit who is from God, that we may understand what God has freely given us [His grace and reconciliation through Jesus Christ].

This is what we speak, not in words taught by human wisdom but in words taught by the Spirit, expressing spiritual truths in spiritual words. The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned.

It is my continual prayer that you will discern the truth about God in Jesus Christ and desire a relationship with Him. That has been the whole reason for my response to your questions about this Jesus we talk about. You have probably heard it said that God stands at the door of our hearts and knocks.

However, there is no knob on the outside of the door, so He cannot open it. Each of us by an act of our own free will must open the door. Christ knocks at the door of each human being’s heart and waits. He will leave only when someone says in effect many times over, “Go away! I don’t want the result of Your loving Spirit in my life.”

It is always my prayer that you will open the door wide and let Jesus Christ, through the prompting of the Holy Spirit, come in. If you haven’t opened that door already, know that He’s waiting.

Your friend,
Matt

 

 

Jesus We Talk About Death Or Torment?

Jesus We Talk About Death Or Torment?

Dear Thomas,

Your eighth question was, “Christians say that I along with everyone else who doesn’t accept Jesus Christ as Savior deserve to die. What have I done that is so bad that your God is going to give me the death penalty? And is this really the death penalty, or is it an eternal torture penalty? Is God, because of my doubts about Jesus Christ, going to send me to hell, where I will be tortured forever because I made some mistakes and didn’t believe things correctly while I was here on earth? Is that what a loving God does?”

Let me again summarize a bit of my answer to your first question. As heirs and descendants of Adam, we are all born with the sin problem (being out of relationship with God). Therefore, we are all destined to reap the same consequence because of that inheritance. That inheritance, that consequence is death. The wages, earnings, or results of sin bring about our ultimate death (see Rom. 6:23).

The Bible speaks of our natural inclination toward sin as well as our missing the mark of righteous living. It also speaks of our outright rebellion, choosing wrong instead of doing what we know to be right.

Sin is an attitude of rebellion, an attitude of lawlessness that has been inherent in each human being since the fall. The sin problem has made its home within us.

Again this is what salvation or the rescue is all about (see Rom. 7:24-23). And the one true and overarching sin that leads to all sinning is the decision not to be in a relationship with God.

Therefore, not choosing to be in a relationship with God, not choosing a new birth, a new inheritance, or a new life in Jesus Christ, we are stuck with our old, natural inheritance.

God does not want that. However, He can’t do anything for us unless by our free will we choose otherwise because He is a holy and just God. But if we choose Him, then He can do everything about it! Once we choose to believe, listen to, and follow Jesus Christ, we have a new beginning.

“Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come! All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation: that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting men’s sins against them” (2 Cor. 5:17-19).

In regards to what you think you have done that is bad enough for the death penalty, I can only repeat Romans 3:23, which says, “For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.”

And that glory “is like a consuming fire” (Deut. 4:24), with its full expression shown in Revelation 20:14-15, which says, “Then death and Hades [or Sheol, the place of the dead] were thrown into the lake of fire.

The destruction in the lake of fire is the second death. If anyone’s name was not found written in the Book of life [symbolic for God’s full reconciling knowledge of us as having been enlivened with His Spirit], he was thrown into the lake of fire.”

Without our willing acceptance of a new heritage in Jesus Christ, we are doomed. Again this is not performance stuff. There is nothing we can perform through good works or righteous living to eliminate the consequence of our being sinful human beings.

This is a realization of who we are by nature. Our natural thoughts and motives lead to actions derived from that nature. As the apostle Paul says in Romans 7:24, “What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death?” The answer is in the next verse: “Thanks be to God—through Jesus Christ our Lord!”

How does God through Jesus Christ as Savior rescue us? Let me explain by using an illustration. The apostle Paul uses the phrase you in Christ throughout his letters to the young churches.

The “you in Christ” or “you hidden in Christ” could be compared to putting furniture into a recreational vehicle, Jesus Christ being the vehicle and we the furniture. Wherever the vehicle goes, the furniture goes.

Whatever happens to the vehicle happens to the furniture. The furniture can be said to be hidden in the vehicle. If the vehicle travels to a place of earthly beauty, so does the furniture.

But the furniture has no power or ability of its own to get there; it is totally dependent on the vehicle. The vehicle, however, possesses all the necessary power and ability to reach any destination.

It is never about the furniture’s work or ability but the vehicle’s. Likewise, it is not our work but Christ’s work within us that accomplishes anything of merit.

We are merely the furniture on board, and as such, we now have the opportunity to enjoy many wonderful experiences with the movement of the vehicle.

The operator of the vehicle, the Holy Spirit, guides it and takes care of the furniture within it. I hope that I have not stretched my illustration too far here!

The work of the Holy Spirit, Christ’s Spirit in the hearts of all men willing to listen to the prompting of that Spirit, is what brings about real change in the lives of those who accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.

This is the “Christ in you” theme of many of the letters of the apostle Paul in the New Testament. I guess you could say that it is the means by which the operator of the vehicle remolds or reshapes the furniture inside the vehicle. The apostle Paul says in

Romans 12 : 2

 

Through the Holy Spirit, God does this changing from the inside out. It is not a self-help program that requires us to prove ourselves worthy of God’s acceptance.

We (the furniture) are safe and secure as long as we remain in Christ (the vehicle). But not being in Christ will lead to our ultimate destruction from all the elements of sin (our earthbound conditions outside the vehicle).

So how do we talk about the consequences of sin and what happens at death? How do we talk about hell? I will have to admit and I am also sad to say—that hell, according to many Christians, is a place of unending, conscious torment inflicted on the unsaved or damned. For many Christians, this is the traditional and accepted biblical teaching.

Let me say, however, that if you believe that man has an immortal soul that has life by right and cannot be extinguished, and if that soul can’t go to heaven, then it has to go somewhere—that is, unless you go the route of Universalism.

In that belief system, which has many problems and is more Hindu than Christian in thought, everyone, including Satan and his agents, will ultimately be saved.

However, if the nature of man as body and soul is not immortal, then there is another option for the end of Sin and sinners besides an eternal hell of everlasting torment.

It seems to me that the end of sin and sinners must be consistent with a gracious and loving God. If the understanding is not such and makes God ungracious and unloving, then I think it appropriate to reexamine the understanding.

I am sometimes concerned that if I were to ask some professed Christians whether they like God, they might take pause and answer in the negative—that is if they really faced the question squarely and honestly.

Are there things that some of us think about or believe about God that make us shy away from Him, even fear Him? In the back of our minds, are there questions about God that don’t seem to fit with a God that is gracious, forgiving, and loving?

Furthermore, if by God’s eternal power, “we live, move, and have our being” (Acts 17:28), then hell must be sustained by the Sustainer of all things and is not self-existent.

Thus, hell as eternal torment says more about God than it does about the sinner. And what it says about God does not seem to me to be good news.

In my opinion, the biggest issues that might keep nonbelievers from accepting the tenets of the Christian faith are twofold, First, if God is all-powerful, all-knowing, completely loving, and personal, why does He allow pain and suffering to exist?

Secondly, if God is just, loving, and holy, how can He allow evil to exist and even extend that evil into a place of eternal torment? Is there no end to evil in God’s universe?

Certainly, I find that Scripture validates an ultimate end to sin and sinners (see Rev. 21:1). This is very important. There is an end to sin and sinners!

Those Christians who believe certain commonly held views about evil, pain, and suffering should hold those views to the test of1 John 4:18, which says, “Perfect love drives out fear.”

Throughout Scripture, when man encounters God, God says, “Fear not.” In fact, it is one of the most common comments in all Scripture. It’s been used more than 360 times!

Certainly, the purpose of keeping lost in a state of eternal torment can’t be as a reminder to the saints in heaven of what happens to those who violate God’s precepts. If that were so, then heaven would not be a place of freedom.

The saints would forever relate to God out of fear, and God will not accept a relationship or allegiance based on fear. If we are to maintain a love relationship with God, exercising complete freedom of will, then we cannot have fear as part of the equation. Thus, my answers to all your questions must be in the context of human free will and a loving God.

“He who did not spare his own Son, but gave him up for us all—how will he not also, along with him, graciously give us all things?” (Rom.8:32). Neither God nor His Son, Jesus Christ, has held hack anything in His offer of salvation to all who will accept it.

In all that God has done, He has never turned around and looked for ways to condemn us. In fact, Romans S:1 says, “Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.” God is anxious, willing, and able to save us.

I’ll be the first to admit that the language used by some in the Christian community over the centuries concerning the results of sin and the future for sinners is frightful indeed. An example would be the descriptions of people being tortured by fire forever, never consumed but always alive, unceasingly feeling the physical and mental pain of total helplessness, having no escape ever.

Is God some kind of psychotic sadist who takes great pleasure in torturing the lost forever? Many Christians have indeed labeled God the initiator and sustainer of eternal torment as the ultimate punishment for those who reject His Son, Jesus Christ.

Unlike Genghis Khan, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Idi Amin, Pol Pot, and Saddam Hussein, to name a few well-known men who killed their perceived enemies, God sustains the lives of His enemies.

What a horrible thought! Further, if we believe He is a vengeful God, who inflicts eternal torment, then all of the lost whether our spouses, children, fathers and mothers, brothers and sisters, or friends—would experience unbelievable torture, pain, and agony forever.

It is true that many people have come forward to make a confession of faith based on nothing more than the fear of what would happen to them if they did not.

Yet what picture of God does this belief in eternal torment leave for the believer? And after hearing such notions about God’s treatment of sinners, how many other people turn away, declaring they want nothing to do with a God like that?

The concept of everlasting torment has probably produced untold numbers of honest skeptics and unbelievers. Why would anyone want to love and worship a God who allows such a thing to exist forever?

What is the good news about that kind of God, and how can you describe that kind of God as gracious and loving? If God operates His universe on the principles of love, hell as eternal torment just doesn’t fit. It doesn’t make any sense.

Your question, “Is this what a loving God does?” is a very good one. How can a God described as total love provide for, sustain, or even tolerate such a torturous existence?

If Jesus is the expression of the character of God-a God who is truly gracious, kind, loving, and forgiving to those who repent—and at the same time understanding that He condones and perpetuates a place of eternal torment, then the following question arises: How can He be both characters at the same time? To me, this also doesn’t make any sense.

Now let’s suppose there is a place of tormenting hell. Let’s say that a teenager in his formative years is a bit rebellious and does some very dumb things, having no time or use for Jesus Christ even though he had ample opportunity to accept and relate to Jesus as others within his peer group did.

Let’s suppose that this teenager, because of excessive drinking, causes an auto accident and dies along with a couple of his buddies. Prior to this rebellious period, however, the young man was a good kid.

What would you think of a God who would condemn him to eternal torment forever and ever? The mistakes and even crimes don’t seem to match the punishment, do they?

Even in our earthly justice systems, when we sentence people to death or life in prison, there is an eventual end to the punishment. Under the concept of eternal torment, however, there is no end to it.

Would anyone punish a young child who stole a cookie with a life sentence?If so, something would be very wrong with the scale, dimension, and degree of punishment for the crime. But that’s exactly what we accuse God of doing when we propose a place of eternal damnation and torment.

Maybe what bothers me most about the idea of hell as eternal torment is the lack of finality to it. There is no end to the consequence of sin and no end to the sinner who committed the wrong.

Heaven and hell coexist eternally. But realizing the extent to which God went to rescue mankind, the sacrifice He made for man’s redemption, and His promise to make all things new, we can conclude that there must be an end to sin in God’s universe. Otherwise, there is no victory over evil and its consequences.

Belief in a hell of eternal torment implies there is no hope for a reduction of punishment or rehabilitation. So what would be its purpose? Presenting someone with the choice between freedom in a loving environment versus punishment in a place of eternal torment does not seem like much of a free choice.

Depending on how well we describe the eternal torment in all its gory details, the choice is not really free at all. Confessions made in torture chambers certainly lack moral validity.

Comments like “Turn to God or burn in hell” or “Come to Me, or I’ll torture you forever” do not seem to present much of a choice. Vengeance, cruelty, and torture make God anything but gracious and loving. Revelation 21:4 speaks of what heaven and earth will be like when everything is created anew.

Revelation 21 : 4

Furthermore, if heaven is a place of love, happiness, and tranquility, what happens if those in heaven know that others are suffering eternally in hell? Wouldn’t their happiness and tranquility be lost?

Wouldn’t there be mourning and crying over the loss? Wouldn’t they be cold and uncaring—and thus unloving—if such knowledge had no impact on them? Does God then keep the inhabitants of heaven in a state of ignorance concerning those who are suffering in hell?

Do the memories of our lost loved ones get erased? The stark contrast between a loving, kind, merciful, and forgiving God and a vengeful God who presides over a creation that includes hell as eternal torment is hard to reconcile. How could anyone believe both?

Yes, it is true that God, as expressed in Jesus, does reveal His frustration and righteous anger when an open and free relationship with Him is thwarted.

That is what the cleansing of the temple recorded in Mark 11:15-17 shows us. But when Scripture talks about God’s wrath, it is often followed by the comment that God gave them up, let them go, and gave them over, meaning there was nothing more a righteous God could do. God allowed people to suffer the consequences of their choices and actions.

As mentioned earlier, the concept of eternal torment is either true or not. Hell, as I understand it, is the end of sin and sinners. The scriptural language throughout the Bible expresses an end, a finishing of the problem of sin.

Psalm 37 says that the wicked will be no more, that the wicked will perish, that they will vanish like smoke, and that all sinners will be destroyed. Malachi 4:1 says, “‘Surely the day is coming; it will burn like a furnace.

All the arrogant and every evildoer will be stubble, and that day that is coming will set them on fire,’ says the Lord Almighty. ‘Not a root or a branch will be left to them.’”

Second Thessalonians 1:9 declares, “They will be punished with everlasting destruction and shut out from the presence of the Lord and from the majesty of his power.”

There is also Philippians 3:19, which says, “Their destiny is destruction.” This destruction, this death is an eternal death or “the second death,” as Scripture describes it. It does not refer to our natural or first death (see Rev. 2:11; 20:6, 14-15; 21:8).

We must also examine how language is used in Scripture when the authors are speaking of hell and the end of sin and sinners. Words like forever, everlasting, and eternal, names for hell, such as Sheol, Gehenna, and Hades; and phrases like the smoke of their torment, unquenchable fire, and forever and forever all need proper understanding.

For example, does the word eternal refer to the punishment or the punishment? Is it an ongoing thing or a once-and-for-all event? Is it the result that is eternal, or is it a process?

Once the destruction of the wicked takes place in the lake of fire (Rev. 20:14), the outcome will be everlasting, final, and forever. Similarly, Sodom and Gomorrah received a punishment of eternal fire; they were burned to total destruction and annihilation, reduced to mere ashes (Jude 1:7).

Using these two biblical accounts as examples, I feel I can safely say that the effect of the fire—not the fire itself—will last for eternity.

Sheol, translated as hell in the Old Testament, was the place of the dead, righteous and unrighteous alike. It was never described as a place of punishment.

The use of the word Sheol was another way of describing going into the grave, the condition of being in or under the earth, the place where we bury the dead.

Gehenna (or the Valley of Hinnom) was an actual place located southwest of Jerusalem. It was a dry gorge that served as the city dump for dead animals and refuse, things thrown away as rejected and useless.

At this city dump fires burned both day and night, and worms infested the dead carcasses. Jesus used the symbolism of Gehenna to describe the place of final punishment.

It is a picture of total loss, where fire and worms ultimately consume everything. The smoke from Gehenna (symbolic of hell) rose day after day, year after year, century after century, seemingly forever. Jesus said in

Matthew 10 : 28

Hades was the god of the underworld in Greek mythology. In the translation from Hebrew to Greek, the word Hades was used for the Hebrew Sheol, though the words have quite different meanings and are not equivalent.

However, the Greek god Hades held the souls of the dead in the underworld, so both words refer to the dead as being placed in the earth.

Scripture speaks of death and a second death (Rev. 2:11; 20:14). It also speaks of a consuming fire (see Heb. 12:29). The first death and fire may not mean the total end of someone or something.

But the second death and an all-consuming fire have a finality to their meaning. In other words, those who are among the lost do not exist beyond the second death, and an all-consuming fire will run its course until it has accomplished its full work.

Scripture also uses terms like forever forever and ever. Forever and ever in many cases describe the effect or result of an event that lasts forever, not the event itself.

At times it just means a very long and undetermined time. It can also be hyperbole like Jonah in the whale. Though it may have seemed like forever, he was actually in the whale only three days and nights (Jonah 2:6).

And there are cases where it is literally true like the many places in Scripture where it says, “His [God’s] love endures forever” (1 Chron. 16:34; 2 Chron. 16:41; Psalms 89:1; 106:1; Jer. 33:11).

I think Satan, the Evil One and the Father of Lies, authored the doctrine of eternal torment. If he could get men to believe in eternal torment as God’s punishment for sin, many would find this an appalling view of the nature and character of God, which would result in millions of skeptics, agnostics, and atheists rebelling against such a God.

“You will not surely die,’ the serpent said to the woman” (Gen. 3:4). He still speaks a variation of that same lie. “You may be tortured, you may be thrown into the lake of fire (see Rev. 20 and 21), but you won’t die.”

Our conceptions and understandings of God mold the desire for our spiritual lives. If we think of God as a judgmental, angry, wrathful, and unforgiving tyrant who inflicts eternal torment on sinners with sadistic pleasure, we will likely run away from Him.

Satan often led Israel’s leadership and its people astray. When they didn’t follow God’s directions, Israel then reaped the natural consequences. When they put themselves in the hands of Satan, they reaped the results.

The history of Israel should say something to us. There are natural consequences to what we believe and how we act. Much as Israel did, many in our society today see themselves as victims and look to blame someone else for their problems.

But perhaps they need to remember the words of the prophet Hosea. “You are destroyed, O Israel- your sins have been your downfall” (Hos. 13:9; 14:1). Israel reaped what it had sown, and so too is the case for many today.

Can it be that God destroys no man, referring to man’s free will decisions to be saved or lost? Does man choose his own destruction if he does not respond to God’s love and His promptings for us to be in a relationship with Jesus Christ?

From that relationship, we could say that it is not a matter of “to be or not to be” (as Shakespeare penned) but rather “to love or not to love.” All human beings can follow the path of love irrespective of their belief system, culture, or time in history.

It is Satan’s active work to destroy man’s loving potentiality by whatever means possible. It is God’s active work to seek, find, and heal the lost for the sake of love.

But within the confines of man’s free will, there comes a point where God can do nothing more to awaken and enliven the person’s spirit of love.

Again, if we come to this point, God has no choice but to give us up, to let us go. That is why everyone who is destroyed in the lake of fire (Rev. 20:14-15) will have destroyed themselves.

Many examples from Scripture show us that God allows man to experience the natural consequences of his rebellion. Jeremiah 7:19 says, “‘But am I the one they are provoking?’ declares the Lord. ‘Are they not rather harming themselves?”’ Several verses later Jeremiah 7:29 says, “The Lord has rejected and abandoned this generation that is under his wrath.”

The Lord spoke in Ezekiel 20:25-26 and said, “I also gave them over I let them become.” Micah. 6:16 warns, “Therefore I will give you over to ruin.” Hosea 11:8 says, “‘How can I give you up? How can I hand you over?” Romans 1:18 proclaims, “The wrath of God is being revealed.” Then it goes on to say in verse 24, “Therefore God gave them over.”

Galatians 6 : 7-8

Romans 6:23 says, “The wages of sin is death,” and we all reap that at our natural first death and potentially with a second death. This giving us up, letting us go, giving us over, this ultimate separation from God is that second death spoken of in Hebrews 2:9, Romans 5:8, and Revelation 2:11, 20:6, 20:14, and 21:8. It is what the unrepentant sinner will experience in the end.

The second death is what Jesus, our human representative, suffered on the cross on our behalf. Jesus wasn’t killed by God’s wrath. God didn’t throw Him into a lake of fire.

But Jesus did suffer the ultimate consequence of sin, the second death. Jesus willingly died our rightful death as our Savior and substitute. It was the mental agony from being separated from His heavenly Father, His life source, that killed Jesus.
It was the crushing weight and the enormity of sin—your sins, my sins, all humanity’s sins that caused a sense of eternal separation from the Father, the God of love.

On the way to Gethsemane, Jesus said, “My soul is exceedingly sorrowful, even unto death” (Matt. 26:38). Even before He experienced the cross, the weight, sorrow, and horror of sin almost destroyed Christ.

His followers and disciples abandoned Him, and Jesus went through the trial and crucifixion totally alone. On the cross, Jesus cried out, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” (Matt. 27:46).

The bond between God the Father and Jesus was broken. His mental agony from the weight of sin drew the life out of Jesus. Jesus, the one who showed us how to love, suffered the consequence of mankind’s nonlove.

Jesus experienced hell from His time in the garden of Gethsemane (see Matt. 26:36—27:50) through His death on the cross.

The pain and agony Jesus endured on the cross were not just a result of the destruction of His physical body. There was also the mental agony of taking on the sins of the world.

As a man, as the second Adam, Jesus suffered the results of sin on our behalf. Jesus was faithful all the way to the cross, never on His own did He decide to use His divinity for self-preservation, but in all ways followed the will of His heavenly Father. He did not exert His divine power to escape.

“God made him who had no sin to be sin for us so that in him we might become the righteousness of God” (2 Cor. 5:21). Jesus experienced the wrath of God.

Jesus experienced the full measure of God’s displeasure with sin and its consequences, which caused so much pain, suffering, and brokenness in this world.

God gave Jesus up and let Him go. At Calvary, the Godhead—Father, Son with His humanity, and Holy Spirit—was ripped apart! It was horrible mercy that Jesus’ crucifixion on a Roman cross helped hasten His bodily death.

Yes, the unrepentant sinner will suffer unto death. That death, because of one’s decision not to be in a relationship with God results in the second and final death of the sinner.

The sinner in Anguish will recognize the horror and consequence of sin and rebellion. He will recognize the justice of God not allowing him a place in heaven.

Because of his choices and developed character, the sinner will understand his unfitness and lack of desire for a kingdom based on love.

So what actually destroys those who are lost and experience the second death? Lost, mankind used his free will in such a manner as to destroy himself. During life, God wooed each to choose the path of a loving relationship.

Having chosen otherwise and then experiencing the reality of God’s unshielded power, majesty, and glory, life cannot be endured. As stated a number of times before, it is a glory that is likened to a consuming fire as expressed in Hebrews 12:29, which says, “For our God is a consuming fire.” Just as Jesus’ death was hastened by the cross, the death of lost humanity will be hastened by the lake of fire (see Rev. 20:14-15).

Besides destroying lost humanity, Satan, and his entire evil angelic host, that fire will also destroy every trace of sin as well as purify the earth. All the while God will weep over all those who chose to be lost just as Jesus wept over unrepentant Jerusalem as recorded in Matthew 23:37.

There will be nothing more that God can do but to let them go and give them up. Unrepentant sinners will have destroyed themselves by their own free will choices.

Yes, there is a literal fire in Revelation 20. This consuming fire rids the earth of every trace of sin; the earth is fully purged and purified.

Such is the end of sin and sinners. The great controversy between God’s government based on love and Satan’s government of self-centeredness and unloving rebelliousness thus comes to an end.

We do not love and worship a God who tortures the lost for eternity. We do not love and worship a God who murders the lost in righteous anger.

Rather, we worship a God of love who cries, a God who is grieved and angry at the unnecessary loss of those who choose to walk the path of self-destruction.

In the end sin in all its forms will show the universe its destructive nature and power. Sin will work itself to its own destruction.

After that, sin and death will be no more. Through the incarnation, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, the God of love proves the victory of God’s love forever.

Each human being has free will. Each of us makes choices that determine our eternal destiny. Can I truly love this God, and do I have the desire to be in a relationship with Him through eternal ages? All have an invitation, and all have a choice.

The truth is that even as the evidence shows, God is indeed worthy of our choosing! “The truth [about God and Jesus Christ] will set you free” (John 8:32).

It will set you free to fall totally in love with God. The rescue plan is available and complete. It is your individual choice. You are free to choose. What will your choice be?

Your friend,
Matt