The World Of Salvation

The World Of Salvation

And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou
comest into thy kingdom.
And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, Today shalt
thou be with me in paradise. Luke 23:42-43

The second of Christ’s cross utterances was spoken in response to the request of the dying thief. Ere considering the words of the Saviour, we shall first ponder what occasioned them.

It was no accident that the Lord of Glory was crucified between two thieves. There are no accidents in a world that is governed by God.

Much less could there have been any accident on that day of all days, or in connection with that event of all events —a day and an event that lie at the very center of the world’s history.

No, God was presiding over that scene. From all eternity He had decreed when where and how and with whom His Son should die. Nothing was left to chance or the caprice of man.

Read and Learn More Seven Sayings of the Savior on the Cross

All that God had decreed came to pass exactly as He had ordained, and nothing happened save as He had eternally purposed. Whatsoever man did was simply that which God’s hand and counsel “determined before to be done” (Acts 4:28).

When Pilate gave orders that the Lord Jesus should be crucified between the two malefactors, all unknown to himself, he was putting into execution the eternal decree of God and fulfilling His prophetic word.

Seven hundred years before this Roman officer gave his command, God had declared through Isaiah that His Son should be “numbered with the transgressors” (Isa. 53:12).

How utterly unlikely this appeared, that the Holy One of God should be numbered with the unholy; that the very One whose finger had inscribed on the tables of stone the Sinaitic.

Law should be assigned a place with the lawless; that the Son of God should be executed with criminals —this seemed utterly inconceivable. Yet it came to pass.

The World Of Salvation

Just as God had ordained, and just as He had announced, so it came to pass.

Why did God order that His beloved Son should be crucified between two criminals? Certainly, God had a reason—a good one, a manifold one, whether we can discern it or not. God never acts arbitrarily.

He has a good purpose for everything He does, for all His works are ordered by infinite wisdom. In this particular instance, several answers suggest themselves to our inquiry.

Was not our blessed Lord crucified with the two thieves to fully demonstrate the unfathomable depths of shame into which He had descended? At His birth He was surrounded by the beasts of the field, and now, at His death.

He is numbered with the refuse of humanity. Again, was not the Saviour numbered with the transgressors to show us the position He occupied as our substitute} He had taken the place that was due us.

And what was that but the place of shame, the place of transgressors, the place of criminals condemned to death?

Again, was He not deliberately humiliated thus by Pilate to exhibit man’s estimate ofthe peerless One—“despised” as well as rejected! Again, was He not crucified with the two thieves?

So that in those three crosses and the ones who hung upon them, we might have a vivid and concrete representation of the drama of salvation and man’s response thereto—the Saviour’s redemption, the sinner repenting and believing, and the sinner reviling and rejecting?

Another important lesson that we may learn from the crucifixion of Christ between the two thieves, and the fact that one received Him and the other rejected Him, is that of the sovereignty of God.

The two malefactors were crucified together. They were equally near to Christ. Both of them saw and heard all that transpired during those fateful six hours. Both were notoriously wicked, both were suffering acutely, both were dying, and both urgently needed forgiveness.

Yet one of them died in his sins, died as he had lived—hardened and impenitent; while the other repented of his wickedness, believed in Christ, called on Him for mercy, and went to paradise.

How can this be accounted for except by the sovereignty of God? We see precisely the same thing going on today. Under the same circumstances and conditions, one is melted and another remains unmoved.

Under the same sermon, one man will listen with indifference, while another will have his eyes opened to see his need and his will moved to close with God’s offer of mercy.

To one the Gospel is revealed; to another, it is “hidden.” Why? All we can say is, “Even so Father, for so it seemed good in Thy sight.” And yet God’s sovereignty is never meant to destroy human responsibility.

Both are taught in the Bible, and it is our business to believe and preach both whether we can harmonize or understand them or not. In preaching both, we may seem to our hearers to contradict ourselves, but what matters that? Said the late C.

H. Spurgeon, when preaching on 1 Timothy 2:3-4, “There stands the text, and I believe that it is my Father’s wish that ‘all men should be saved, and come to the knowledge of the truth.’

But I know, also, that He does not will it so that He will save any one of them unless they believe in His Son; for He has told us over and over again that He will not.

He will not save any man except he forsakes his sins, and turns to Him with full purpose of heart: that I also know. And I know, also, that He has a people whom He will save.

whom by His eternal love He has chosen and whom by His eternal power He will deliver. I do not know how that squares with this, that is another of the things I do not know.”

And said this prince of preachers, “I will just stand to what I ever shall and always Have preached, and take God’s Word as it stands, whether I can reconcile it with another part of God’s Word or not.”

We say again, that God’s sovereignty is never meant to destroy man’s responsibility. We are to make diligent use of all the means that God has appointed for the salvation of souls.

We are bidden to preach the Gos¬ pel to “every creature.” Grace is free; the invitation is broad enough to take in “whosoever believeth.”

Christ turns away none who come to Him. Yet, after we have done all, after we have planted and watered,.it is God who “giveth the increase,” and this He does as best pleaseth His sovereign will.

In the salvation of the dying thief, we have a clear view of victorious grace such as is to be found nowhere else in the Bible. God is the God of all grace, and salvation is entirely by His grace.

“By grace are ye saved” (Eph. 2:8), and it is “by grace” from beginning to end. Grace planned salvation, grace provided salvation, and grace so works on and in His elect, so as to overcome the hardness of their hearts.

The obstinacy of their wills, and the enmity of their minds, and thus make them willing to receive salvation. Grace begins, grace continues, and grace consummates our salvation.

Salvation by grace—sovereign, irresistible, free grace—is illustrated in the New Testament by example as well as by precept. Perhaps the two most striking cases of all are those of Saul of Tarsus and the dying robber.

And the case of the latter is even more noteworthy than the former. In the case of Saul, who afterward became Paul the apostle to the Gentiles, there was an exemplary moral character to begin with.

Writing years afterward of his condition before his conversion, the apostle declared that by touching the righteousness of the law he was “blameless” (Phil. 3:6).

He was a “Pharisee of the Pharisees”: punctilious in his habits, and correct in his deportment. Morally, his character was flawless. After his conversion, his life was one of Gospel righteousness.

Constrained by the love of Christ, he spent himself preaching the Gospel to sinners and in laboring to build up the saints.

Doubtless, our readers will agree with us when we say that probably Paul came nearest to attaining the ideals of the Christian life and that he followed after his Master more closely than any other saint has since.

But with the saved thief, it was far otherwise. He had no moral life before his conversion and no life of active service after it. Before his conversion, he respected neither the law of God nor the law of man.

After his conversion, he died without having the opportunity to engage in the service of Christ. I would emphasize this because these are the two things that are regarded by so many as contributing factors to our salvation.

It is supposed that we must first fit ourselves by developing a noble character before God will receive us as His sons; and that after He has received us, tentatively.

we are merely placed on probation, and unless we now bring forth a certain quality and quantity of good works, we shall “fall from grace and be lost.”

But the dying thief bad no good works either before or after conversion. Hence we are shut up to the conclusion that if saved at all, he was certainly saved by sovereign grace.

The salvation of the dying thief also disposes of another prop that the legality of the carnal mind interposes to rob God of the glory due unto His grace.

Instead of attributing the salvation of lost sinners to the matchless grace of God, many professing Christians seek to account for them by human influences, instrumentalities, and circumstances.

Either the preacher, providential and propitious circumstances, or the prayers of believers are looked to as the main cause. Let us not be misunderstood here.

Often God is indeed pleased to use means in the conversion of sinners; that frequently He condescends to bless our prayers and efforts to point sinners to Christ; that many times.

He causes His providences to awaken and arouse the ungodly to a realization of their state. But God is not shut up to these things. He is not limited to human instrumentalities.

His grace is all-powerful, and when He pleases, that grace can save us despite the lack of human instrumentalities and in the face of unfavorable circumstances. So it was in the case of the saved thief.

His conversion occurred at a time when to outward appearance Christ had lost all power to save either Himself or others.

This thief had marched along with the Saviour through the streets of Jerusalem and had seen Him sink beneath the weight of the Cross! It is highly probable that as one who followed.

The occupation of a thief and robber, this was the first day he had ever set eyes on the Lord Jesus, and now that he did see Him, it was under every circumstance of weakness and disgrace.

His enemies were triumphing over Him. His friends had mostly forsaken Him. Public opinion was unanimously against Him. His very crucifixion was regarded as utterly inconsistent with His Messiahship.

His lowly condition was a stumbling block to the Jews from the very first, and the circumstances of His death must have intensified it, especially to one who had never seen Him except in this condition.

Even those who had believed in Him were made to doubt by His crucifixion. There was not one in the crowd who stood there with outstretched fingers and cried, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29).

And yet, notwithstanding these obstacles and difficulties in the way of this faith, the thief apprehended the Saviourhood and Lordship of Christ.

How can we possibly account for such faith and such spiritual understanding in one circumstance as he was? How can we explain the fact that this dying thief took a suffering, bleeding?

Crucified man for his God! It cannot be accounted for apart from divine intervention and supernatural operation. His faith in Christ was a miracle of grace.

It is also to be remarked that the thief’s conversion took place before the supernatural phenomena of that day.

He cried, “Lord, remember me” before the hours of darkness, before the triumphant cry “It is finished,” before the rending of the temple veil, before the quaking of the earth and the shivering of the rocks, before the centurion’s confession.

“Truly this was the Son of God.” God purposely set his conversion before these things so that His sovereign grace might be magnified and His sovereign power acknowledged.

God designedly chose to save this thief under the most miserable circumstances that no flesh should glory in His presence.

God deliberately arranged this combination of unpropitious conditions and surroundings to teach us that “Salvation is of the Lord,” to teach us not to magnify human instrumentality above divine agency.

To teach us that every genuine conversion is the direct product of the supernatural operation of the Holy Spirit.

We shall now consider together the thief himself, his various utterances, his request of the Saviour, and our Lord’s response—“And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom.

And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, Today shall thou be with me in paradise” (Luke 23:42-43).

1. Here we see a representative sinner.

We shall never get to the heart of this incident until we regard the conversion of this man as a representative case, and the thief himself as a representative character.

Some have sought to show that the original character of the repenting thief was nobler and worthier than that of the other who repented not.

But this is not only not true to the facts of the case, but it serves to efface the peculiar glory of his conversion and takes away from the wonderment of God’s grace.

It is of great importance to see that before the time when the one repented and believed, there was no essential difference between the two thieves. In nature, in history, and in circumstances, they were one.

The Holy Spirit has been careful to tell us that they both reviled the suffering Saviour: “The chief priests mocking him, with the scribes and elders, said, He saved others; himself he cannot save.

If he is the King of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him.

He trusted in God; let him deliver him now, if he will have him: for he said, I am the Son of God. The thieves also, which were crucified with him, cast the same in his teeth” (Matt. 27:41-44, emphasis added).

Terrible indeed was the condition and action of this robber. On the very brink of eternity, he unites with the enemies of Christ in the awful sin of mocking Him. This was unparalleled turpitude.

Think of it—a man in his dying hour deriding the suffering Saviour! O what a demonstration of human depravity and the native enmity of the carnal mind against God!

And reader, by nature there is the same depravity inhering within you, and unless a miracle of divine grace has been wrought upon you, there is the same enmity against God and His Christ present in your heart.

You may not think so; you may not feel so; you may not believe so. But that does not alter the fact. The Word of Him who cannot lie declares, “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked” (Jer. 17:9, emphasis added).

That is a statement of universal application. It describes what every human heart is by natural birth.

And again the same Scripture of Truth declares, “The carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be” (Rom. 8:7). This too diagnoses the state of every descendant of Adam.

“For there is no difference: for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Rom. 3:22-23). Unspeakably solemn is this, yet it needs to be pressed. It is not until our desperate condition is realized that we discover our need for a divine Saviour.

It is not until we are brought to see our total corruption and unsoundness that we shall hasten to the Great Physician. It is not until we find in this dying thief a portrayal of Ourselves that we shall join in saying, “Lord, remember me.”

We have to be abased before we can be exalted. We have to be stripped of the filthy rags of our self-righteousness before we are ready for the garments of salvation.

We have to come to God as beggars, empty-handed before we can receive the gift of eternal life. We have to take the place of lost sinners before Him if we would be saved.

Yes, we have to acknowledge ourselves as thieves before we can have a place in the family of God. “But,” you say, “I am no thief! I acknowledge I am not all I ought to be. I am not perfect. I will go so far as to admit I am a sinner. But I cannot allow this thief to represent my state and condition.”

Ah, friend, your case is far worse than you suppose. You are a thief and that of the worst type. You have robbed God! Suppose that a firm in the East appointed an agent to represent them in the West and that every month they forwarded to him his salary.

But suppose also at the end of the year his employers discovered that though the agent had been cashing the checks they sent him, nevertheless, he had served another firm all that time.

Would not that agent be a thief? Yet this is precisely the situation and state of every sinner. He has been sent into this world by God, and God has endowed him with talents and the capacity to use and improve them.

God has blessed him with health and strength; He has supplied his every need and provided innumerable opportunities to serve and glorify Him. But with what result? The very things God has given him have been misappropriated.

The sinner has served another master, even Satan. He dissipates his strength and wastes his time in the pleasures of sin. He has robbed God.

Unsaved reader, in the sight of heaven, your condition is as desperate and your heart is as wicked as that of the thief. See in him a picture of yourself.

2. Here we see that man has to come to the end of himself before he can be saved.

Above we have contemplated this dying robber as a representative sinner, a sample specimen of what all men are by nature and practice by nature at enmity against God.

And His Christ; by practice, robbers of God, misusing what He has given us and failing to render what is due Him.

We are now to see that this crucified robber was also a representative case of his conversion. And at this point, we shall dwell simply upon
his helplessness.

To see ourselves as lost sinners is not sufficient. To learn that we are corrupt and depraved by nature and sinful transgressors by practice is the first important lesson.

The next is to learn that we are utterly undone and that we can do nothing whatever to help ourselves. To discover that our condition is so desperate that it is entirely beyond human repair is the second step toward salvation looking at it from the human side.

But if the man is slow to learn that he is a lost sinner and unfit for the presence of a holy God, he is slower still to recognize that he can do nothing toward his salvation and is unable to work any improvement in himself to be fit for God.

Yet it is not until we realize that we are “without strength” (Rom. 5:6), that we are “impotent” (John 5:3), that it is not by works of righteousness that we do but by His mercy God saves us (Titus 3:5), not until then shall we despair of ourselves and look outside of ourselves to the One who can save us.

The great Scripture type of sin is leprosy, and for leprosy, man can devise no cure. God alone can deal with this dreadful disease. So it is with sin. But as we have said, man is slow to learn his lesson.

He is like the prodigal son, who when he had squandered his substance in the far country in riotous living and began to be ‘‘in want,” instead of returning to the father straightaway,

He “went and joined himself to a citizen of that country” (Luke 15:15) and went to the fields to feed swine; in other words, he went to work. Likewise, the sinner who has been aroused to his need.

Instead of going at once to Christ, he tries to work himself into God’s favor. But he will fare no better than the prodigal —the husks of the swine will be his only portion.

Or again, like the woman bowed down with her infirmity for many long years. She tried many physicians before she sought the Great Physician: so the awakened sinner seeks relief and peace in first one thing and then another.

Until he completes the weary round of religious performances, and ends by being “nothing bettered, but rather [grows] worse” (Mark 5:26).

No, it is not until that woman had “spent all she had” that she sought Christ: and it is not until the sinner comes to the end of his resources that he will betake himself to the Saviour.

Before any sinner can be saved, he must come to the place of realized weakness. This is what the conversion of the dying thief shows us. What could he do? He could not walk in the paths of righteousness, for there was a nail through either foot.

He could not perform any good works, for there was a nail through either hand. He could not turn over a new leaf and live a better life, for he was dying.

And, my reader, those hands of yours that are so ready for self-righteous acting, and those feet of yours that are so swift to run in the way of legal obedience, must be nailed to the Cross.

The sinner has to be cut off from his workings and be made willing to be saved by Christ. A realization of your sinful’ condition, of your lost condition, of your helpless condition, is nothing more or less than old old-fashioned conviction of sin.

And this is the sole prerequisite for coming to Christ for salvation, for Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners.

3. Here we see the meaning of repentance and faith.

Repentance may be considered under various aspects. It includes in its meaning and scope a change of mind about sin, a sorrowing for sin, and a forsaking of sin. Yet there is more in repentance than these.

Repentance is the realization of our lost condition; it is the discovery of our ruin; it is the judging of ourselves; it is the owning of our lost estate.

Repentance is not so much an intellectual process as it is the conscience active in the presence of God. And this is exactly what we find here in the case of the thief.

First, he says to his companion, “Dost not thou fear God, seeing thou art in the same condemnation?” (Luke 23:40). A short time before he had mingled his voice with those who were reviling the Saviour.

But the Holy Spirit had been at work upon him, and now his conscience is active in the presence of God. It was not, “Dost not thou fear punishment?” but, “Dost not thou fear God?” He apprehends God as a judge.

And then, in the second place he adds, “And we indeed justly; for we receive the due reward of our deeds” (Luke 23:41). Here we see him acknowledging his guilt and the justice of his condemnation.

He passes the sentence upon himself. He makes no excuses and attempts no extenuation. He recognized he was a transgressor, and that, as such, he fully deserved punishment for his sins, yea, that death was his due.

Have you taken this position before God, my reader? Have you openly confessed your sins to Him? Have you passed judgment upon yourself and your ways? Are you ready to acknowledge that death is your “due”?

Whatever you palliate sin or prevaricate about it, you are shutting yourself out from Christ.

Christ came into the world to save sinners —confessed sinners, sinners who take the place of sinners before God, sinners who are conscious that they are lost and undone.

The thief’s “repentance toward God” was accompanied by “faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ.” In contemplating his faith, we may notice first that it was ail intelligent head faith.

In the earlier paragraphs of this chapter, we have called attention to the sovereignty of God and His irresistible and victorious grace, which were exhibited in the conversion of this thief.

Now we turn to the other side of the truth, equally necessary to press, a side that is not contradictory to what we have said previously but rather complementary and supplementary.

Scripture does not teach that if God has elected a certain soul to be saved, that person will be saved whether they believe or not. That is a false conclusion drawn by those who reject the truth. ‘

No, Scripture teaches that the same God who predestined the end also predestined the means. The God who decreed the salvation of the dying thief fulfilled His decree by giving him a faith with which to believe.

This is the plain teaching of 2 Thessalonians 2:13 and other Scriptures—“God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth.” This is just what we see here in connection with this robber. He “believed the truth.”

His faith took hold of the Word of God. Over the Cross was the superscription, “This is Jesus the King of the Jews.” Pilate had placed it there in derision.

But it was the truth nevertheless, and after he had written it, God would not allow him to alter it.

The board bearing this superscription had been carried in front of Christ through the streets of Jerusalem and out to the place of crucifixion, and the thief had read it.

And divine grace and power had opened the eyes of his understanding to see it was the truth. His faith grasped the Kingship of Christ, hence his mention of “when thou comest into thy kingdom.” Faith always rests on the written Word of God.

Before a man will believe that Jesus is the Christ, he must have the testimony before him that Jesus is the Christ. The distinction is often made between head faith and heart faith, and properly so, for the distinction is real and vital.

Sometimes head faith is described as valueless, but this is foolish. There must be head faith before there can be heart faith. We must believe intellectually before we can believe savingly in the Lord Jesus.

Proof of this is seen in connection with the heathen: they have no head faith, and therefore they have no heart faith. We readily grant that head faith will not save unless it is accompanied by heart faith.

But we insist that there is no heart faith unless there has first been bad faith. How can they believe in Him whom they have not heard? True, one may believe in Him without believing in Him.

But one cannot believe in Him without first believing in Him. So it was with the dying thief. In all probability, he had never seen Christ before the day of his death.

But he had seen the written superscription testifying to His Kingship, and the Holy Spirit used this as the basis of his faith.

We say, then, that he was an intelligent faith: first an intellectual faith, the believing of the written testimony submitted to him; second, a heart faith, the resting in confidence on Christ Himself as the Saviour of sinners.

Yes, this dying robber exercised a heart faith that rested savingly On Christ. We shall try to be very simple here. A man may have had faith in the Lord Jesus and be lost.

A man may believe in the historic Christ and be no better for it, just as he is no better for believing in the historic Napoleon. Reader, you may believe all about the Saviour—His perfect life, His sacrificial death.

His victorious resurrection, His glorious ascension, His promised return—but you must do more than this. Gospel faith is a confiding faith. Saving faith is more than a correct opinion or a train of reasoning.

Saving faith transcends all reason. Look at this dying thief! Was it reasonable that Christ should notice him? A crucified robber, a confessed criminal, one who a few minutes ago had been reviling Him!

Was it reasonable that the Saviour should take any notice of him? Was it reasonable to expect that he should be transported from the very brink of the Pit into paradise? Ah, my reader, the head reasons, but the heart does not.

And this man’s petition came from his heart. He had not the use of his hands and feet (and they are not needed for salvation; they rather impede), but he had the use of his heart and tongue.

They were free to believe and confess—“with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation” (Rom. 10:10).

We may also notice he was a humble faith. He prayed with becoming modesty. It was not “Lord, honor me,” or “Lord, exalt me,” but “Lord, if thou wilt but think of me! if thou wilt only look on me”—“Lord, remember me.”

And yet that word “remember” was wonderfully full and appropriate. He might have said, “Pardon me, save me, bless me”; but “remember” included them all.

An interest in Christ’s heart will include an interest in all His benefits! Moreover, this word was well suited to the condition of the one who uttered it. He was an outcast from society—who would remember him? The public would think no more of him.

His friends would be glad to forget him as having disgraced his family. But there is One with whom he ventures to lodge this petition—“Lord, remember me” Finally, we may notice that his was a courageous faith.

Perhaps this is not apparent at first sight, but a little consideration will make it plain. He who hung on the central cross was the one on whom all eyes were turned and toward whom all the vile mockery of a vulgar mob was directed.

Every faction of that crowd joined in jeering at the Saviour. Matthew tells us that “they that passed by reviled him,” and that “likewise also the chief priests [mocked] him, with the scribes and elders.”

Luke informs us “The soldiers also mocked him” (23:36). It is therefore easy to understand why the thieves should also take up the taunting cry. No doubt the priests and scribes smiled benignly upon them as they did so.

But suddenly there was a change. The repenting thief instead of continuing to sneer and jibe at Christ turns to his companion and openly rebukes him in the hearing of the spectators gathered around the crosses, crying, “This man hath done nothing amiss” (Luke 23:41).

Thus he condemned the whole Jewish nation! But more; not only does he bear testimony to Christ’s innocence, but he also confessed His Kingship. And thus by a single stroke, he cuts himself off from the favor of his companion and of the crowd as well!

We talk today of the courage that is needed to openly witness for Christ, but such courage these days pales into utter insignificance before the courage displayed that day by the dying thief.

4. Here we see a marvelous case of spiritual illumination.

It is perfectly wonderful the progress made by this man in those few dying hours. His growth in grace and the knowledge of his Lord was amazing.

From the brief record of the words that fell from his lips, we may discover seven things that he had learned under the tuition of the Holy Spirit.

First, he expresses his belief in a future life where retribution would be meted out by a righteous and sin-avenging God. “Dost not thou fear God?” proves this. He sharply reprimands his companion.

and as much as says, How dare you have the temerity to revile this innocent man? Remember that shortly you will have to appear before God and face a tribunal infinitely more solemn than the one that sentenced you to be crucified. God is to be feared, so be silent.

Second, as we have seen, he had a sight of his sinfulness—“thou art in the same condemnation? And we indeed justly; for we receive the due reward of our deeds” (Luke 23:40-41).

He recognized that he was a transgressor. He saw that sin merited punishment, that “condemnation” was just. He owned that death was his “due.” This was something that his companion neither confessed nor recognized.

Third, he bore testimony to Christ’s sinlessness—“This man hath done nothing amiss” (Luke 23:41). And here we may mark the pains God took to guard the spotless character of His Son.

Especially is this to be seen toward the end. Judas was moved to say, “I have betrayed innocent blood.” Pilate testified, “I find no fault in him.” Pilate’s wife said, “Have nothing- to do with this just man.”

And now that He hangs on the Cross, God opens the eyes of this robber to see the faultlessness of His beloved Son and opens his lips so that he bears witness to His excellency.

Fourth, he not only witnessed the sinless humanity of Christ, but he also confessed His Godhead —“Lord, remember me,” he said.

A marvelous word was that. The Saviour nailed to the Tree, the object of Jewish hatred and the butt of a vulgar mob’s ridicule. This thief had heard the scornful challenge of the priests.

“If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross,” and no response had been given. But moved by faith and not by sight, he recognizes and owns the Deity of the central sufferer.

Fifth, he believed in the Saviourhood ofthe LordJesus. He had heard Christ’s prayer for His enemies, “Father, forgive them,” and to one whose heart the Lord had opened, that short sentence became a saving sermon.

His cry, “Lord, remember me” included within its scope, “Lord, save me,” which therefore implies his faith in the Lord Jesus as Saviour.

He must have believed that Jesus was a Saviour for the chief of sinners, or how could he have believed that Christ would “remember” such as he?

Sixth, he evidenced his faith in Christ’s Kingship—“when thou comest into thy kingdom.” This too was a wonderful word. Outward circumstances all seemed to belie His Kingship.

Instead of being seated on a throne, He hung upon a cross. Instead of wearing a royal diadem, His brow was encircled with thorns. Instead of being waited upon by a retinue of servants, He was numbered with transgressors. Nevertheless, He was King—King of the Jews (Matt. 2:2).

Finally, he looked forward to the second coming of Christ— “when thou comest. ” He looked away from the present to the future. He saw beyond the “sufferings” to the “glory.”

Over the cross, the eye of faith detected the crown. And in this, he was before the apostles, for unbelief had closed their eyes. Yes, he looked beyond the first advent in shame to the second advent in power and majesty.

And how can we account for the spiritual intelligence of this dying robber? When did he receive such insight into the things of Christ? How come it is that this babe in Christ made such amazing progress in the school of God?

It can be accounted for only by divine influence. The Holy Spirit was his teacher! Flesh and blood had not revealed these things unto him but the Father in heaven.

What an illustration that divine things are hidden from “the wise and prudent” and are revealed to “babes”!

5. Here we see the Saviourhood of Christ.

The crosses were only a few feet apart, and it did not take the Saviour long to hear this cry of the penitent thief. What was His response thereto? He might have said, You deserve your fate: you are a wicked robber and have merited death.

Or He might have replied, You have left it till too late: you should have sought Me sooner. Ah! but had He not promised, “Him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out!” So it proved here.

Of the reproaches that were cast on Him by the crowd, the Lord Jesus took no notice. To the insulting challenge of the priests to descend from the Cross, He made no response.

But the prayer of this contrite, believing thief arrested His attention. At the time He was grappling with the powers of darkness and sustaining the awful load of His people’s guilt.

And we should have thought He might be excused from attending to individual applications. Ah! but a sinner can never come to Christ in an unacceptable time. He gives him an answer of peace and without delay.

The salvation of the repentant and believing robber illustrates not only Christ’s readiness but also His power to save sinners. The Lord Jesus is no feeble Saviour.

Blessed be God; He can “save unto the uttermost” them that come unto God by Him. And never was this so signally displayed as when on the Cross. This was the time of the Redeemer’s “weakness” (2 Cor. 13:4).

When the thief cried “Lord, remember me,” the Saviour was in agony on the accursed Tree.

Yet even then, even there, He had the power to redeem this soul from death and open for him the gates of paradise! Never doubt, then, or question the infinite sufficiency of the Saviour.

If a dying Saviour could save, how much more He who rose in triumph from the tomb, never more to die! In saving this thief, Christ gave an exhibition of His power at the very time when it was almost clouded.

The salvation of the dying thief demonstrates that the Lord is willing and able to save all who come to Him. If Christ received this penitent, believing thief, then none need despair of a welcome if they will but come to Christ.

If this dying robber was not beyond the reach of divine mercy, then none are who will respond to the invitations of divine grace. The Son of Man came “to seek and to save that which was lost” (Luke 19:10), and none can sink lower than that.

The Gospel of Christ is the power of God “to everyone that believeth” (Rom. 1:16). O limit not the grace of God. A Saviour is provided for the very chief of sinners (1 Tim. 1:15), if only he will believe.

Even those who reach the dying hour yet in their sins are not beyond hope. I believe that very, very few are saved on a deathbed, and it is the height of folly.

For any man to postpone his salvation till then, for there is no guarantee that any man will have a deathbed. Many are cut off suddenly, without any opportunity to lie down and die.

Yet even one on a deathbed is not beyond the reach of divine mercy. As said one of the Puritans, “There is one such case recorded that none need despair, but only one, in Scripture, that none might presume.”

Yes, here we see the Saviourhood of Christ. He came into this world to save sinners, and He left it and went to paradise accompanied by a saved criminal —the first trophy of His redeeming blood!

6. Here we see the destination of the saved at death.

In his splendid book The Seven Sayings of Christ on the Cross, Dr. Anderson-Berry has pointed out that the word “today” is not correctly placed in the rendering of our King James Version.

And that the designed correspondence between the thief’s request and Christ’s response requires a different construction of the latter.

The form of Christ’s reply is designed to match in its order of thought the robber’s petition. This will be seen if we arrange the two in parallel couplets thus:

And he said unto Jesus
And Jesus said unto him
Lord
Verily I say unto thee
Remember me
Shalt thou be with me
When thou comest
Today
Into thy kingdom
In paradise.

By arranging the words thus, we discover the correct emphasis. “Today” is the emphatic word. In our Lord’s gracious response to the thief’s request.

We have a striking illustration of how divine grace exceeds human expectations. The thief prayed that the Lord would remember him in His coming kingdom, but Christ assured him that before that very day had passed he should be with the Saviour.

The thief asked to be remembered in an earthly kingdom, but Christ assured him of a place in paradise. The thief simply asked to be “remembered,” but the Saviour declared he should be “with him.” Thus doeth God exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think.

Not only does Christ’s reply signify the survival of the soul after the death of the body, but it tells us that the believer is with Him during the interval that divides death from the res-resurrection.

To make this more emphatic, Christ prefaced His promise with the solemn but assuring words “ Verily I say unto you.”

It was this prospect of going to Christ at death that cheered the martyr Stephen in his last hour, and therefore did he cry, “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit” (Acts 7:59, emphasis added).

It was this blessed expectation that moved the apostle Paul to say, I have “a desire to depart, and to be with Christ; which is far better” (Phil. 1:23, emphasis added).

Not unconsciousness in the grave but with Christ in paradise is what awaits every believer at death.

Every “believer” I say, for the souls of unbelievers, instead of going to paradise, pass to the place of torments, as is clear from our Lord’s teaching in Luke 16. Reader, whither would your soul go, if this moment you were dying?

How hard Satan has striven to hide this blessed prospect from the saints of God! On the one hand, he has propagated the doleful dogma of soul sleep.

The teaching is that believers are in a state of unconsciousness between death and the resurrection; on the other hand, he has invented a horrible purgatory, to terrify believers with the thought that at death they pass into the fire.

Necessary to purify and fit them for heaven. How thoroughly the word of Christ to the thief disposes of these God-dishonoring delusions! The thief went straight from the cross to paradise!

The moment a sinner believes, that moment is he “made meet to be a partaker of the inheritance of the saints in light” (Col. 1:12).

“For by one offering he hath perfected forever them that are sanctified” (Heb. 10:14). Our fitness for Christ’s presence, as well as our title, rests solely on His shed blood.

7. Here we see the longing of the Saviour for fellowship.

In fellowship, we reach the climax of grace and the sum of Christian privilege. Higher than fellowship we cannot go. God has called us “unto the fellowship of his Son” (1 Cor. 1:9).

We are often told that we are “saved to serve,” and this is true, but it is only a part of the truth and by no means the most wondrous and blessed part of it. We are saved for fellowship.

God had innumerable “servants” before Christ came here to die —the angels never do His bidding. Christ came not primarily to secure servants but those who should enter into fellowship with Himself.

That which makes heaven superlatively attractive to the heart of the saint is not that heaven is a place where we shall be delivered from all sorrow and suffering, nor is it that heaven is the place where we shall meet again those we loved in the Lord.

nor is it that heaven is the place of golden streets and pearly gates and jasper walls—no; blessed as these things are, heaven without Christ would not be heaven.

It is Christ the heart of the believer who longs for and pants after—“Whom have I in heaven but thee? and there is none upon earth that I desire beside thee” (Ps. 73:25).

And the most amazing thing is that heaven will not be heaven to Christ in the highest sense until His redeemed are gathered around Him. It is His saints that His heart longs for.

To come again and “receive us unto himself” is the joyous expectation set before Him. Not until He sees of the travail of His soul will He be fully satisfied.

These are the thoughts suggested and confirmed by the words of the Lord Jesus to the dying thief. “Lord, remember me” had been his cry. And what was the response? Note it carefully.

Had Christ merely said, “Verily I say unto thee, Today thou shalt be in paradise,” that would have set at rest the fears of the thief. Yes, but it did not satisfy the Saviour.

That upon which His heart was set was the fact that that very day a soul saved by His precious blood should be with Him in paradise! We say again, this is the climax of grace and the sum of Christian blessing.

Said the apostle, “I have a desire to depart, and to be with Christ” (Phil. 1:23, emphasis added).

And again, he wrote, “Absent from the body”—free from all pain and care? No. “Absent from the body”—translated to glory? No. “Absent from the body. . . present with the Lord” (2 Cor. 5:8, emphasis added).

So too with Christ. Said He, “In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you”; yet when He adds, “I will come again,”

He does not say “And conduct you unto the Father’s house,” or “I will take you to the place I have prepared for you,” but “I will come again, and receive you unto myself’ (John 14:2-3, emphasis added).

To “be ever with the Lord” (1 Thess. 4:17) is the goal of all our hopes; to have us forever with Himself is that to which He looks forward with eager and gladsome expectation. Thou shalt be with Me in paradise!

Why We Must Think Rightly About God

Why We Must Think Rightly About God

O, Lord God Almighty, not the God of the philosophers and the wise but the God of the prophets and apostles; and better than all, the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, may I express Thee unblamed?

They that know Thee not may call upon Thee as other than Thou art, and so worship not Thee but a creature of their fancy; therefore enlighten our minds that we may know Thee as Thou art, so that we may perfectly love Thee and worthily praise Thee.

In the name of Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

What comes into our minds when we think about God is the most important thing about us.

We Must Think Rightly About God

Worship is pure or basic as the worshiper entertains high or low thoughts of God. For this reason, the gravest question before the Church is always God Himself.

Read and Learn  More The knowledge of the Holy

And the most portentous fact about any man is not what he at a given time may say or do, but what he in his deep heart conceives God to be like.

We tend by a secret law of the soul to move toward our mental image of God. This is true not only of the individual Christian but of the company of Christians that compose the Church.

The most revealing thing about the Church is her idea of God, just as her most significant message is what she says about Him or leaves unsaid.

For her silence is often more eloquent than her speech. She can never escape the self-disclosure of her witness concerning God.

Were we able to extract from any man a complete answer to the question, “What comes into your mind when you think about God?” we might predict with certainty the spiritual future of that man.

If we knew exactly what our most influential religious leaders think of God today, we might be able with some precision to foretell where the Church will stand tomorrow.

Without a doubt, the mightiest thought the mind can entertain is the thought of God, and the weightiest word in any language is its word for God.

Thought and speech are”God’s gifts to creatures made in His image; these are intimately associated with Him and impossible apart from Him.

Significantly, the first word was the Word: “And the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” We may speak because God spoke. In Him word and idea are indivisible.

That our idea of God corresponds as nearly as possible to the true being of God is of immense importance to us. Compared with our actual thoughts about Him, our creedal statements have little consequence.

Our real idea of God may lie buried under the rubbish of conventional religious notions and may require an intelligent and vigorous search before it is finally unearthed and exposed for what it is.

Only after an ordeal of painful self-probing are we likely to discover what we believe about God.

A right conception of God is basic not only to systematic theology but to practical Christian living as well. It is to worship what the foundation is to the temple; where it is inadequate or out of plumb the whole structure must sooner or later collapse.

I believe there is scarcely an error in doctrine or a failure in applying Christian ethics that cannot be traced finally to imperfect and ignoble thoughts about God.

It is my opinion that the Christian conception of God current in these middle years of the twentieth century is so decadent as to be utterly beneath the dignity of the Most High God and actually to constitute for professed believers something amounting to a moral calamity.

All the problems of heaven and earth, though they were to confront us together and at once, would be nothing compared with the overwhelming problem of God: Who He is; what He is like; and what we as moral beings must do about Him.

The man who comes to a right belief about God is relieved of ten thousand temporal problems, for he sees at once that these have to do with matters which at the most cannot concern him for very long.

But even if the multiple burdens of time may be lifted from him, the one mighty single burden of eternity begins to press down upon him with a weight more crushing than all the woes of the world piled one upon another.

That mighty burden is his obligation to God. It includes an instant and lifelong duty to love God with every power of mind and soul, to obey Him perfectly, and to worship Him acceptably.

And when the man’s laboring conscience tells him that he has done none of these things, but has from childhood been guilty of foul revolt against the Majesty in the heavens, the inner pressure of self-accusation may become too heavy to bear.

The gospel can lift this destroying burden from the mind, give beauty to ashes, and the garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness.

But unless the weight of the burden is felt the gospel can mean nothing to the man; and until he sees a vision of God high and lifted, there will be no woe and no burden.

Low views of God destroy the gospel for all who hold them. Among the sins to which the human heart is prone, hardly any other is more hateful to God than idolatry, for idolatry is at the bottom a libel on His character.

The idolatrous heart assumes that God is other than He is – in itself a monstrous sin – and substitutes for the true God one made after its likeness.

Always this God will conform to the image of the one who created it and will be base or pure, cruel or kind, according to the moral state of the mind from which it emerges.

A god begotten in the shadows of a fallen heart will quite naturally be no true likeness of the true God. “Thou though test,” said the Lord to the wicked man in the psalm, “that I was altogether such as one as thyself ”.

Surely this must be a serious affront to the Most High God before whom cherubim and seraphim continually do cry, “Holy, holy, holy, Lord God of Sabaoth.”

Let us beware lest we in our pride accept the erroneous notion that idolatry consists only in kneeling before visible objects of adoration and that civilized peoples are therefore free from it.

The essence of idolatry is the entertainment of thoughts about God that are unworthy of Him. It begins in the mind and may be present where no overt act of worship has taken place.

“When they knew God,” wrote Paul, “they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.”

Then followed the worship of idols fashioned after the likeness of men and birds and beasts and creeping things. But this series of degrading acts began in the mind.

Wrong ideas about God are not only the fountain from which the polluted waters of idolatry flow; they are themselves idolatrous. The idolater simply imagines things about God and acts as if they were true.

Perverted notions about God soon rot the religion in which they appear. The long career of Israel demonstrates this enough, and the history of the Church confirms it.

So necessary to the Church is a lofty concept of God that when that concept in any measure declines, the Church with her worship and her moral standards declines along with it.

The first step down for any church is taken when it surrenders its high opinion of God. Before the Christian Church goes into eclipse anywhere there must first be a corrupting of her simple basic theology.

She simply gets a wrong answer to the question, “What is God like?” and goes on from there. Though she may continue to cling to a sound nominal creed, her practical working creed has become false.

The masses of her adherents come to believe that God is different from what He is, and that is heresy of the most insidious and deadly kind.

The heaviest obligation lying upon the Christian Church today is to purify and elevate her concept of God until it is once more worthy of Him – and others. In all her prayers and labors this should have first place.

We do the greatest service to the next generation of Christians by passing on to them undimmed and undiminished that noble concept of God which we received from our Hebrew and Christian fathers of generations past.

This will prove of greater value to them than anything that art or science can devise.

O, God of Bethel, by whose hand
Thy people still are fed;
Who through this weary pilgrimage
Hast all our fathers led!
Our vows, our prayers we now present
Before Thy throne of grace:
God of our fathers! Re the God
Of their succeeding race.

The Holy Trinity

The Holy Trinity

God of our fathers, enthroned in light, how rich, how musical is the tongue of England! Yet when we attempt to speak forth Thy wonders, our words how poor they seem and our speech how unmelodious.

When we consider the fearful mystery of Thy Triune Godhead we lay our hand upon our mouth. Before that burning bush we ask not to understand, but only that we may fitly adore Thee, One God in Persons Three. Amen.

To meditate on the three Persons of the Godhead is to walk in thought through the garden eastward in Eden and to tread on holy ground.

Our sincerest effort to grasp the incomprehensible mystery of the Trinity must remain forever futile, and only by deepest reverence can it be saved from actual presumption.

Some persons who reject all they cannot explain have denied that God is a Trinity. Subjecting the Highest to their cold, level-eyed scrutiny, they conclude that it is impossible that he could be both One and Three.

Read and Learn  More The knowledge of the Holy

These forget that their whole life is enshrouded in mystery. They fall to consider that any real explanation of even the simplest phenomenon in nature lies hidden in obscurity and can no more be explained than can the mystery of the Godhead.

Every man lives by faith, the nonbeliever as well as the saint; the one by faith in natural laws and the other by faith in God. Every man throughout his entire life constantly accepts without understanding.

The Holy Trinity

“God understandeth the way thereof, and he knoweth the place thereof” but mortal man never.

Thomas Carlyle, following Plato, pictures a man, a deep pagan thinker, who had grown to maturity in some hidden cave and is brought out suddenly to see the sunrise.

“What would his wonder be,” exclaims Carlyle, “his rapt astonishment at the sight we daily witness with indifference! With the free, open sense of a child, yet with the ripe faculty of a man, his whole heart would be kindled by that sight…

This green flowery rock-built earth, the trees, the mountains, rivers, many-sounding seas; that great deep sea of azure that swims overhead; the winds sweeping through it.

The black cloud fashioning itself together, now pouring out fire, hail, and rain; what is it? Ay, what? At bottom we do not yet know; we can never know at all.”

How different are we who have grown used to it, who have become jaded with a satiety of wonder? “It is not by our superior insight that we escape the difficulty,” says Carlyle, “it is by our superior levity, our inattention, our want of insight.

It is by not thinking that we cease to wonder at it… We call that fire of the black thundercloud electricity, and lecture learnedly about it, and grind the like of it out of glass and silk: but what is it? Whence comes it? Whither goes it?

Science has done much for us; but it is a poor science that would hide from us the great deep sacred infinitude of Nescience, whither we can never penetrate, on which all science swims as a mere superficial film.

This world, after all our science and sciences, is still a miracle; wonderful, inscrutable, magical, and more, to whosoever will think of it.”

These penetrating, almost prophetic, words were written more than a century ago, but not all the breathtaking advances of science and technology since that time have invalidated one word or rendered obsolete as much as one period or comma.

Still, we do not know. We save face by repeating frivolously the popular jargon of science. We harness the mighty energy that rushes through our world.

We subject it to fingertip control in our cars and our kitchens; we make it work for us like Aladdin’s jinn, but still, we do not know what it is.

Secularism, materialism, and the intrusive presence of things have put out the light in our souls and turned us into a generation of zombies. We cover our deep ignorance with words, but we are ashamed to wonder, we are afraid to whisper “mystery.”

The Church has not hesitated to teach the doctrine of the Trinity. Without pretending to understand, she has given her witness, she has repeated what the Holy Scriptures teach.

Some deny that the Scriptures teach the Trinity of the Godhead on the ground that the whole idea of the Trinity in unity is a contradiction in terms.

But since we cannot understand the fall of a leaf by the roadside or the hatching of a robin egg in the nest yonder, why should the Trinity be a problem to us?

“We think more loftily of God,” says Michael de Molinos, “by knowing that He is incomprehensible, and above our understanding, than by conceiving Him under any image, and “creature beauty, according to our rude understanding.”

Not all who called themselves Christians through the centuries were Trinitarians, but as the presence of God in the fiery pillar glowed above the camp of Israel throughout the wilderness journey, saying to all the world,

“These are My people,” so belief in the Trinity has since the days of the apostles shone above the Church of the Firstborn as she journeyed down the years. Purity and power have followed this faith.

Under this banner have gone forth apostles, fathers, martyrs, mystics, hymnists, reformers, and revivalists, and the seal of divine approval has rested on their lives and their labors.

However they may have differed on minor matters, but the doctrine of the Trinity bound them together.

What God declares the believing heart confesses without the need. of further proof. Indeed, to seek proof is to admit doubt, and to obtain proof is to render faith superfluous.

Everyone who possesses the gift of faith will recognize the wisdom of those daring words of one of the early Church fathers: “I believe that Christ died for me because it is incredible; I believe that he rose from the dead because it is impossible.”

That was the attitude of Abraham, who against all evidence waxed strong in faith, giving glory to God. It was the attitude of Anselm.

“The second Augustine,” one of the greatest thinkers of the Christian era, who held that faith must precede all efforts to understand.

Reflection upon revealed truth naturally follows the advent of faith, but faith comes first to the hearing ear, not to the cogitating mind.

The believing man does not ponder the Word and arrive at faith by a process of reasoning, nor does he seek confirmation of faith from philosophy or science.

His cry is, “O earth, earth, hear the word of the Lord. Yea, let God be true, but every man a liar.”

Is this to dismiss scholarship as valueless in the sphere of revealed religion? By no means. The scholar has a vitally important task to perform within a carefully prescribed precinct.

His task is to guarantee the purity of the text, to get as close as possible to the Word as originally given. He may compare Scripture with Scripture until he has discovered the true meaning of the text. But right there his authority ends.

He must never sit in judgment upon what is written. He dare not bring the meaning of the Word before the bar of his reason.

He dare not commend or condemn the Word as reasonable or unreasonable, scientific or unscientific. After the meaning is discovered, that meaning judges him; never does he judge it.

The doctrine of the Trinity is truth for the heart. The spirit of man alone can enter through the veil and penetrate that Holy of Holies.

“Let me seek Thee in longing,” pleaded Anselm, “let me long for Thee in seeking; let me find Thee in love, and love Thee in finding.

” Love and faith are at home in the mystery of the Godhead. Let reason kneel in reverence outside.

Christ did not hesitate to use the plural form when speaking of Himself along with the Father and the Spirit.

“We will come unto him and make our abode with him.” Yet again He said, “I and my Father are one.

” It is most important that we think of God as Trinity in Unity, neither confounding the Persons nor dividing the Substance. Only so may we think rightly of God and in a manner worthy of Him and of our souls.

It was our Lord’s claim to equality with the Father that outraged the religionists of His day and led at last to His crucifixion.

The attack on the doctrine of the Trinity two centuries later by Arius and others was also aimed at Christ’s claim to deity.

During the Arian controversy 318 Church fathers (many of them maimed and scarred by the physical violence suffered in earlier persecutions) met at Nicaea and adopted a statement of faith, one section of which runs:

I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ,
The only-begotten Son of God,
Begotten of Him before all ages,
God of God, Light of Light,
Very God of Very God,
Begotten, not made,
Being of one substance with the Father,
By whom all things were made.

For more than sixteen hundred years this has stood as the final test of orthodoxy, as well as it should, for it condenses in theological language the teaching of the New Testament concerning the position of the Son in the Godhead.

The Nicene Creed also pays tribute to the Holy Spirit as being Himself God and equal to the Father and the Son:

Or believe in the Holy Spirit
The Lord and giver of life,
Which proceedeth from the Father and the Son,
Who with the Father and Son together
Is worshipped and glorified.

Apart from the question of whether the Spirit proceeds from the Father alone or the Father and the Son, this tenet of the ancient creed has been held by the Eastern and Western branches of the Church and by all but a tiny minority of Christians.

The authors of the Athanasian Creed spelled out with great care the relation of the three Persons to each other, filling in the gaps in human thought as far as they were able while staying within the bounds of the inspired Word.

“In this Trinity,” runs the Creed, “nothing is before or after, nothing is greater or less: but all three Persons coeternal, together and equal.”

How do these words harmonize with the slaying of Jesus, “My Father is greater than I”?

Those old theologians knew, and wrote into the Creed, “Equal to His Father, as touching His Godhead; less than the Father, as touching His manhood.”

This interpretation commends itself to every serious-minded seeker after truth in a region where the light is all but blinding.

To redeem mankind the Eternal Son did not leave the bosom of the Father; while walking among men He referred to Himself as “the only begotten Son which is in the bosom of the Father,” and spoke of Himself again as “the Son of man which is in heaven.

” We grant mystery here, but not confusion. In His incarnation, the Son veiled His deity, but He did not void it. The unity of the Godhead made it impossible that He should surrender anything of His deity.

When He took upon Him the nature of man, He did not degrade Himself or become even for a time less than He had been before. God can never become less than Himself. For God to become anything that He has not been is unthinkable.

The Persons of the Godhead, being one, have one will. They work always together, and never one smallest act is done by one without the instant acquiescence of the other two.

Every act of God is accomplished by the Trinity in Unity. Here, of course, we are being driven by the necessity to conceive of God in human terms.

We are thinking of God by analogy with man, and the result must fall short of ultimate truth; yet if we are to think of God at all, we must do it by adapting creature thoughts and creature-words to the Creator.

It is a real if understandable error to conceive of the Persons of the Godhead as conferring with one another and reaching agreement by interchange of thought as humans do.

It has always seemed to me that Milton introduces an element of weakness into his celebrated Paradise Lost when he presents the Persons of the Godhead conversing with each other about the redemption of the human race.

When the Son of ‘God walked the earth as the Son of Man, He spoke often to the Father and the Father answered Him again; as the Son of Man, He now intercedes with God for His people.

The dialogue involving the Father and the Son recorded in the Scriptures is always to be understood as being between the Eternal Father and the Man Christ Jesus.

That instant, immediate communion between the Persons of the Godhead which has been from all eternity knows not sound nor effort nor motion.

Amid the eternal silences
None heard but He who always spake,
And the silence was unbroken.
O marvellous O worshipful
No song or sound is heard
But everywhere and every hour In love,
in wisdom, and power;
The Father speaks His dear Eternal Word. —Frederick W. Faber

A popular belief among Christians divides the work of God between the three Persons, giving a specific part to each, as, for instance, creation to the Father, redemption to the Son, and regeneration to the Holy Spirit.

This is partly true but not wholly so, for God cannot so divide Himself that one Person works while another is inactive.

In the Scriptures, the three Persons are shown to act in harmonious unity in all the mighty works that are wrought throughout the universe.

In the Holy Scriptures, the work of creation is attributed to the Father (Gen. 1:1), to the Son (Col. 1:16), and to the Holy Spirit (Job. 26:13 and Ps. 104:30).

The incarnation is shown to have been accomplished by the three Persons in full accord (Luke 1: 35), though only the Son became flesh to dwell among us.

At Christ’s baptism, the Son came up out of the water, the Spirit descended upon Him and the Father’s voice spoke from heaven (Matt. 3:16, 17).

Probably the most beautiful description of the work of atonement is found in Hebrews 9:14, where it is stated that Christ, through the Eternal Spirit, offered Himself without spot to God; and there we behold the three persons operating together.

The resurrection of Christ is likewise attributed variously to the Father (Acts 2:32), to the Son (John 10:17-18), and the Holy Spirit (Rom. 1:4).

The salvation of the individual man is shown by the apostle Peter to be the work of all three Persons of the Godhead (1 Pet. 1:2), and the indwelling of the Christian man’s soul is said to be by the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit (John 14:15-23).

The doctrine of the Trinity, as I have said before, is truth for the heart. The fact that it cannot be satisfactorily explained, instead of being against it, is in its favor. Such a truth had to be revealed; no one could have imagined it.

0 Blessed Trinity!
0 simplest Majesty! O Three in One!
– Thou art forever God alone.
Holy Trinity!
Blessed equals Three.
One God, we praise Thee. —Frederick W. Faber

The Self Existence of God

The Self-Existence of God

Lord of all beings! Thou alone canst affirm I AM THAT I AM; yet we who are made in Thine image may each one repeat “I am,” so confessing that we derive from Thee and that our words are but an echo of Thine own.

W6 acknowledge Thee to be the great Original of which we through Thy goodness are grateful if imperfect copies.

We worship Thee, O Father Everlasting. Amen. “God has no origin,” said Novatian and it is precisely this concept of no-origin which distinguishes That-which-is-God from whatever is not God.

Origin is a word that can apply only to things created. When we think of anything that has origin we are not thinking of God.

The Self Existance Of God

In our effort to discover the origin of things, we confess our belief that everything was made by Someone who was made of none.

Read and Learn  More The knowledge of the Holy

By familiar experience, we are taught that everything “came from” something else. Whatever exists must have had a cause that antedates it and was at least equal to it, since the lesser cannot produce the greater.

Any person or thing may be at once both caused and the cause of someone or something else; and so, back to the One who is the cause of all but is Himself caused by none.

The child by his question, “Where did God come from?” is unwittingly acknowledging his creaturehood. Already the concept of cause and source and origin is firmly fixed in his mind.

He knows that everything around him came from something other than himself, and he simply extends that concept upward to God.

The little philosopher is thinking in true creature-idiom and, allowing for his lack of basic information, he is reasoning correctly.

He must be told that God has no origin, and he will find this hard to grasp since it introduces a category with which he is wholly unfamiliar and contradicts.

The bent toward origin-seeking is so deeply ingrained in all intelligent beings, a bent that impels them to probe ever back and back toward undiscovered beginnings.

To think steadily of that to which the idea of origin cannot apply is not easy if indeed it is possible at all.

Just as under certain conditions, a tiny point of light can be seen not by looking directly, at it but by focusing the eyes slightly to one side, so it is with the idea of the Uncreated.

When we try to focus our thoughts upon One who is a pure uncreated being we may see nothing at all, for He dwelleth in light that no man can approach unto.

Only by faith and love are we able to glimpse Him as he passes by our shelter in the cleft of the rock.

“And although this knowledge is very cloudy, vague and general,” says Michael de Molinos, being supernatural, it produces a far more clear and perfect cognition of God than any sensible or particular apprehension that can be formed in this life; since all corporeal and sensible images are immeasurably remote from God.”

The human mind, being created, has an understandable uneasiness about the Uncreated. We do not find it comfortable to allow for the presence of One who is wholly outside of the circle of our familiar knowledge.

We tend to be disquieted by the thought of One who does not account to us for His being, who is responsible to no one, who is self-existent, self-dependent, and self-sufficient.

Philosophy and science have not always been friendly toward the idea of God, the reason being that they are dedicated to the task of accounting for things and are impatient with anything that refuses to give an account of itself.

The philosopher and the scientist will admit that there is much that they do not know; but that is quite another thing from admitting that there is something which they can never know, which indeed they have no technique for discovering.

To admit that there is One who lies beyond us, who exists outside of all our categories, who will not be dismissed with a name, who will not appear before the bar of our reason, nor submit to our curious inquiries.

This requires a great deal of humility, more than most of us possess, so we save face by thinking God down to our level, or at least down to where we can manage Him.

Yet how He eludes us! For He is everywhere while He is nowhere, for “where” has to do with matter and space, and God is independent of both.

He is unaffected by time or motion, is wholly self-dependent, and owes nothing to the worlds His hands have made.

Timeless, spaceless, single, lonely,
Yet sublimely Three,
Thou art grandly, always, only God is Unity!
Lone in grandeur, lone in glory,
Who shall tell Thy wondrous story?
Awful Trinity! —Frederick W. Faber

It is not a cheerful thought that millions of us who live in a land of Bibles, who belong to churches and labor to promote the Christian religion, may yet pass our whole life on this earth without once having thought or tried to think seriously about the being of God.

Few of us have let our hearts gaze in wonder at the I AM, the self-existent Self back of which no creature can think. Such thoughts are too painful for us.

We prefer to think about where it will do more good – about how to build a better mousetrap, for instance, or how to make two blades of grass grow where one grew before.

For this, we are now paying a too-heavy price in the secularization of our religion and the decay of our inner lives.

Perhaps some sincere but puzzled Christian may at this juncture wish to inquire about the practicality of such concepts as I am trying to set forth here. “What bearing does this have on my life?” he may ask.

“What possible meaning can the self-existence of God have for me and others like me in a world such as this and in times such as these?”

To this, I reply that, because we are the handiwork of God, it follows that all our problems and their solutions are theological.

Some knowledge of what kind of God it is that operates the universe is indispensable to a sound philosophy of life and a sane outlook on the world scene.

The much-quoted advice of Alexander Pope,
Know then thyself presume not God to scan:
The proper study of mankind is man,

If followed literally would destroy any possibility of man ever knowing himself in any but the most superficial way. We can never know who or what we are but we know at least something of what God is.

For this reason, the self-existence of God is not a wisp of dry doctrine, academic and remote; it is as near as our breath and as practical as the latest surgical technique.

For reasons known only to Himself, God honored man above all other beings by creating him in His image. And let it be understood that the divine image in man is not a poetic fancy, not an idea born of religious longing.

It is a solid theological fact, taught plainly throughout the Sacred Scriptures and recognized by the Church as a truth necessary to a right understanding of the Christian faith.

Man is a created being, a derived and contingent self, who of himself possesses nothing but is dependent each moment for his existence upon the One who created him after His likeness.

The fact of God is necessary to the fact of man. Think God away and man has no ground of existence. That God is everything and man nothing is a basic tenet of Christian faith and devotion.

Here the teachings of Christianity coincide with those of the more advanced and philosophical religions of the East. Man for all his genius is but an echo of the original Voice, a reflection of the uncreated Light.

As a sunbeam perishes when cut off from the sun, so man apart from God would pass back into the void of nothingness from which he first leaped at the creative call.

Not man only, but everything that exists came out of and is dependent upon the continuing creative impulse. “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God…

All things were made by him and without him was not anything made that was made.” That is how John explains it, and with him agrees the apostle Paul.

“For by him were all things created, that are in heaven and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers.

All things were created by him, and for him; and he is before all things, and by him, all things consist.”

To this witness the writer to the Hebrews adds his voice, testifying of Christ that He is the brightness of God’s glory and the express image of His Person, and that He upholds all things by the word of His power.

In this utter dependence of all things upon the creative will of God lies the possibility for both holiness and sin. One of the marks of God’s image in man is his ability to exercise moral choice.

The teaching of Christianity is that man chose to be independent of God and confirmed his choice by deliberately disobeying a divine command.

This act violated the relationship that normally existed between God and His creature; it rejected God as the ground of existence and threw man back upon himself.

Thereafter he became not a planet revolving around the central Sun, but a sun in his own right, around which everything else must revolve.

A more positive assertion of selfhood could not be imagined than those words of God to Moses: I AM THAT I AM.

Everything God is, everything that is God, is outlined in that unqualified declaration of independent being.

Yet in God, the self is not sin but the quintessence of all possible goodness, holiness, and truth.

The natural man is a sinner because and only because he challenges God’s selfhood to his own. In all else he may willingly accept the sovereignty of God; in his own life, he rejects it. For him, God’s dominion ends where he begins.

For him, the self becomes Self, and in this, he unconsciously imitates Lucifer, that fallen son of the morning who said in his heart, “I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God… I will be like the Most High.”

Yet so subtle is the self that scarcely anyone is conscious of its presence. Because man is born a rebel, he is unaware that he is one.

His constant assertion of self, as far as he thinks of it at all, appears to him a perfectly normal thing. He is willing to share himself, sometimes even to sacrifice himself for a desired end, but never to dethrone himself.

No matter how far down the scale of social acceptance he may slide, he is still in his own eyes a king on a throne, and no one, not even God, can take that throne from him.

Sin has many manifestations but its essence is one. A moral being, created to worship before the throne of God, sits on the throne of his selfhood and from that elevated position declares, “I AM.”

That is sin in its concentrated essence; yet because it is natural it appears to be good. It is only when in the gospel the soul is brought before the face of the Most Holy.

One without the protective shield of ignorance that the frightful moral incongruity is brought home to the conscience.

In the language of evangelism, the man who is thus confronted by the fiery presence of Almighty God is said to be under conviction.

Christ referred to this when He said of the Spirit whom He would send to the world, “And when he comes, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness and judgment.”

The earliest fulfillment of these words of Christ was at Pentecost after Peter had preached the first great Christian sermon.

“Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men, and brethren, what shall we do?” This “What shall we do?” is the heart cry of every man who suddenly realizes that he is a usurper and sits on a stolen throne.

However painful, it is precisely this acute moral consternation that produces true repentance and makes a robust Christian after the penitent has been dethroned and has found forgiveness and peace through the gospel.

“Purity of heart is to will one thing,” said Kierkegaard, and we may with equal truth turn this about and declare, “The essence of sin is to will one thing.”

For to set our will against the will of God is to dethrone God and make ourselves supreme in the little kingdom of Mansoul.

This is sin at its evil root. Sins may multiply like the sands by the seashore, but they are yet one.

Sins are because sin is. This is the rationale behind the much-maligned doc: fine of natural depravity which holds that the independent man can do nothing but sin and that his good deeds are not good at all.

His best religious works God rejects as He rejected the offering of Cain. Only when he has restored his stolen throne to God are his works acceptable.

The struggle of the Christian man to be good while the bent toward self-assertion still lives within him as a kind of unconscious moral reflex is vividly described by the apostle Paul in the seventh chapter of his Roman Epistle; and his testimony is in full accord with the teaching of the prophets.

Eight hundred years before the advent of Christ the prophet Isaiah identified sin as rebellion against the will of God and the assertion of the right of each man to choose for himself the way he shall go.

“All we like sheep have gone astray,” he said, “we have turned every one to his way,” and I believe that no more accurate description of sin has ever been given.

The witness of the saints has been in full harmony with prophet and apostle, that an inward principle of self lies at the source of human conduct, turning everything men do into evil.

To save us completely Christ must reverse the bent of our nature; He must plant a new principle within us so that our subsequent conduct will spring out of a desire to promote the honor of God and the good of our fellow men.

The old self-sins must die, and the only instrument by which they can be slain is the Cross.

“If any man comes after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me,” said our Lord, and years later the victorious Paul could say, “I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me.”

My God shall sin its power maintain And in my soul defiant live!

‘T is not enough that Thou forgive,
The cross must rise and self be slain.
0 God of love, Thy power disclose:
T is not enough that Christ should rise,
I, too, must seek the brightening skies,
And rise from death, as Christ arose. —Greek hymn

Prophecy Concerning A Sacrificial Lamb

Prophecy Concerning A Sacrificial Lamb

The Lamb of God

And Abraham said, “My son, God will provide for
Himself the lamb for a burnt offering.” (Genesis 22:8, emphasis added)

Adam and Eve sinned against God when they rebelled against His commandment. And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, “Of every tree ofthe garden you may freely eat; but of the tree ofthe knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.” (Genesis 2:16-17, emphasis added).

Sin and death entered humanity through their disobedience and man’s nature became evil. Adam and Eve were ashamed of their nakedness and hid from God’s presence.

Read and Learn More Key Biblical Messianic Prophecies

The serpent, Satan’s tool, was cursed by God for instigating their sin. God also made a promise to Satan, that a Deliverer would come and destroy his evil works.

God did not excuse Eve’s sin because she was deceived. He said that she would conceive and bear children in pain. And her husband would rule over her.

God cursed the ground because of Adam’s sin. Thorns and thistles sprang up in the earth and Adam would experience heavylabourin providing food from the fields. Then he would eventually die and return to the dust of the earth from which he was made.

Yet God also showed Adam and Eve mercy. They had tried to cover their nakedness, but their self-efforts were inadequate. Before banishing them from the Garden of Eden, God made them clothing from animal skins; the first shedding of blood to provide covering.

The two sons of Eve brought offerings to God. Cain was a farmer and brought some of the produce of his toil. Abel was a shepherd and in faith, he offered a sacrificed lamb, the firstborn of his flock.

Abel’s offering was accepted by God. But God did not respect Cain and his offering. So Cain was very angry and, turning in enmity against Abel, he lured his brother into a field and murdered him.

He would be sacrificed to make sinners righteous before God, enabling them to have an intimate relationship with Him. Him and restoring what was lost by sin in the Garden of Eden.

Prophecy Concerning A Sacrificial Lamb

God commanded Abraham to take his son Isaac and go to the land of Moriah, and offer Isaac there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains that God would show him. So Abraham obeyed and went to the place God had told him about, a three-day journey.

Abraham told his servants to stay with the donkeys, while he and Isaac went to worship God. Then Abraham made a remarkable statement of faith, he said that they would return.

As God had promised to create a nation through Isaac, Abraham reasoned that if he had to kill his son, God would bring him back to life.

The young man Isaac carried the wood for the burnt offering; Abraham carried the fire and the knife. As they went off together, Isaac asked his father where the lamb was for the sacrifice. And Abraham said that God Himself would provide the lamb for a burnt offering.

At the place God had appointed, Abraham built an altar and placed the wood on top. Then he tied Isaac and laid him on the wood. Just as Abraham was reaching for his knife, the Angel of the LORD called his name and commanded him to stop.

Then Abraham saw a ram caught in a bush by its horns and he sacrificed it as a burnt offering, instead of Isaac.

Abraham had passed an extreme test of faith in not withholding his son, proving that he trusted God completely and would fully obey His commandments. Therefore God promised to bless him and give him many descendants.

In this literal event, there was also a picture of a future event. The Messiah, Lamb of God, would be a burnt offering for the sins of all mankind.

“Now the blood shall be a sign for you on the houses where you are. And when I see the blood, I will pass over you; and the plague shall not be on you to destroy you when I strike the land of Egypt. ” (Exodus 12:13).

Pharaoh had obstinately refused every command of God to release the Israelites from their slavery in Egypt. As he continued to resist God, the series of warning plagues in Egypt became increasingly severe.

God sent Moses with a final warning. Every firstborn of the people and animals in the land of Egypt would die, but all the children of Israel would be saved from this disaster. Yet even then, Pharaoh would not relent.

God gave Moses instructions that would separate and preserve the children of Israel from God’s judgment. Every man should take a healthy male lamb for his family.

At twilight, on the fourteenth day ofthe first month, they were to kill the lamb and daub some of its blood on the doorposts of their houses. The meat was to be roasted and eaten with unleavened bread and bitter herbs. They were to eat it in a hurry, dressed ready to leave.

God would pass through the land of Egypt that night and kill all the firstborn animals and people. He would also bring judgment on all the gods of Egypt. But when He saw the blood of the lamb on the houses He would pass over and the plague would not destroy them.

God ordained that the Passover feast was to be celebrated annually, and the story of God’s protection and deliverance was to be faithfully related to each new generation.

After the LORD went through the land and killed the firstborn, Pharaoh released the children of Israel. Moses led them out of his kingdom, to serve the LORD God of Israel.

Afterwards, Pharaoh regretted that he had released his former slaves and pursued them to the Red Sea. But God miraculously parted the waters and made a way through the sea for His people to cross over.

When they were safely on the other side, He brought the waters back together, drowning their enemies.

This actual event, when the blood of a lamb on the wooden doorposts of the Israelite’s houses saved them from death, was also a picture of a future event.

The atoning blood of the Messiah, shed on the wooden cross of His crucifixion, would separate and preserve from judgment all those who believed in Him, securing their eternal salvation.

Fulfillment

When Zechariah’s son John finally burst onto the scene, prepared for his unique role, and filled with the Holy Spirit, there was an excited and fervent messianic expectancy among the people.

Eager crowds flocked to hear his fearless and fiery message of repentance, and many were baptized by him.

The Jewish leaders sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask John who he was, and he told them that he was not the Messiah, or Elijah, or the Prophet.

Under further pressure to identify who he was, John the Baptist claimed that he was the fulfillment of Isaiah’s prophecy. He said I am:

The voice of one crying in the wilderness:
“Prepare the way ofthe LORD;
Make straight in the desert highway for our God.” (Isaiah 40:3)

Then the Pharisees questioned his authority to baptize. John answered that he baptized with water; but there was One standing among them who came after him, yet was higher in rank and he was not worthy to untie His sandals.

John was witnessing the pre-existence of Jesus. He was six months older than his cousin, yet he stated that Jesus was before him.

Witness John The Baptist

The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, “Behold! The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world” ( John 1:29, emphasis added).

Immediately after Jesus’ baptism, He was led by the Spirit into the wilderness, to be tempted by the devil. He fasted for forty days and nights and afterwards, He was hungry.

The tempter came to Him, saying, that if He was the Son of God, He should turn the stones into bread. But Jesus said: “It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God. (Matthew 4:4, Deuteronomy 8:3)

Then the devil took Him to Jerusalem and put Him on top of the temple there, and said, “If You are the Son ofGod, throw Yourself down. For it is written: ‘He shall give His angels charge over you,’ and, ‘In their hands, they shall bear you up, Lest you dash your foot against a stone.’’ (Matthew 4:5, Psalm 91:11, 12)

Jesus answered, “It is written again, ‘ You shall not tempt the LORD your God.”’ (Matthew 4:7, Deuteronomy 6:16)

Then the devil took Him to the peak of a very high mountain and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world. He said that he would give them all to Jesus if He would fall and worship him.

Jesus said, “Away with you, Satan! For it is written, ‘You shall worship the LORD your God, and Him only you shall serve. (Matthew 4:10, Deuteronomy 6:13)

Then Satan left Jesus, and angels came and took care of Him.

Adam had failed when tested, but Jesus triumphed over temptation. Just as the lamb for the Passover feast had to be spotless, Jesus remained undefiled by sin. He resisted and defeated Satan with the Word of God.